Colocação de endoprótese vascular versus cirurgia para coarctação de aorta: revisão sistemática
Carregando...
Data
2012-08-03
Autores
Rubira, Cláudio José [UNESP]
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Resumo
A Coarctação da aorta (CoA) é responsável por 5% a 7% das cardiopatias congênitas, com uma incidência de 0,3 a 0,4 por 1000 nascidos vivos. A cirurgia foi a única forma de terapia para CoA até 1982, quando a angioplastia tornou-se uma alternativa disponível para o seu tratamento. Recoarctação, aneurisma e dissecção da aorta permaneceram desvantagens de ambos os tratamentos. Para evitar estes inconvenientes, em 1990, endopróteses vasculares foram introduzidas para coarctação nativa e recoarctação e desde então, tornaramse uma abordagem alternativa. A melhor abordagem para o tratamento da CoA, se cirurgia aberta ou a colocação de endoprótese vascular, não está estabelecida. Analisar a efetividade e a segurança da colocação de endoprótese vascular em comparação com a cirurgia aberta em pacientes com CoA. O Grupo Peripheral Vascular Diseases da Cochrane realizou a busca em seu Registro Especializado (última busca Setembro de 2011) e na Central (2011, nº 3). Nós também procuramos em MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED, Web of Science e LILACS (última busca em setembro de 2011). Foram avaliadas as referências encontradas e aplicados os critérios de inclusão para os estudos selecionados. Não houve restrição de linguagem. Ensaios clínicos controlados aleatorizados ou quase-aleatorizados que compararam pacientes com CoA submetidos a cirurgia aberta ou a colocação de endoprótese vascular. Os autores da revisão avaliaram independentemente os estudos identificados para a elegibilidade de inclusão. Nós excluímos estudos após reunião de consenso. Os critérios de seleção foram aplicados para avaliação do título e resumo de todos os estudos identificados. No total, foram selecionados cinco estudos para a análise de texto completo. Após avaliação detalhada, foram excluídos todos os estudos porque não havia...
Coarctation of the aorta (CoA) accounts for 5% to 7% of congenital heart disease, with an incidence of 0.3 to 0.4 per 1000 live births. Surgery was the only choice of therapy for CoA until 1982 when balloon angioplasty became an available alternative for its treatment. Re-coarctation, aneurysm and aortic dissection remain the disadvantages of both treatments. To avoid those disadvantages, in 1990 endovascular stents were introduced for native coarctation and re-coarctation and since then they have become an alternative approach to surgical repair. The best approach to treat the CoA, whether open surgery or by stent placement, is not clear. To analyze the effectiveness and safety of stent placement compared with open surgery in patients with coarctation of the thoracic aorta. The Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group searched their Specialised Register (last searched September 2011) and CENTRAL (2011, Issue 3).We also searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED, Web of Science and LILACS (last searched in September 2011). We evaluated the located references and applied the inclusion criteria to selected studies. There was no restriction on language. Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled clinical trials that compared patients with CoA undergoing open surgery or stent placement. The review authors independently assessed the studies identified for eligibility for inclusion. We excluded studies after a consensus meeting. All identified studies were screened and had the selection criteria applied to the title and abstract. In total, we selected five studies for full-text analysis. After detailed evaluation, we excluded all studies because there was no comparison between stent placement and open surgery. There is insufficient evidence with regards to the best treatment for coarctation of the thoracic aorta. This review... (Complete abstract click electronic access below)
Coarctation of the aorta (CoA) accounts for 5% to 7% of congenital heart disease, with an incidence of 0.3 to 0.4 per 1000 live births. Surgery was the only choice of therapy for CoA until 1982 when balloon angioplasty became an available alternative for its treatment. Re-coarctation, aneurysm and aortic dissection remain the disadvantages of both treatments. To avoid those disadvantages, in 1990 endovascular stents were introduced for native coarctation and re-coarctation and since then they have become an alternative approach to surgical repair. The best approach to treat the CoA, whether open surgery or by stent placement, is not clear. To analyze the effectiveness and safety of stent placement compared with open surgery in patients with coarctation of the thoracic aorta. The Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group searched their Specialised Register (last searched September 2011) and CENTRAL (2011, Issue 3).We also searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED, Web of Science and LILACS (last searched in September 2011). We evaluated the located references and applied the inclusion criteria to selected studies. There was no restriction on language. Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled clinical trials that compared patients with CoA undergoing open surgery or stent placement. The review authors independently assessed the studies identified for eligibility for inclusion. We excluded studies after a consensus meeting. All identified studies were screened and had the selection criteria applied to the title and abstract. In total, we selected five studies for full-text analysis. After detailed evaluation, we excluded all studies because there was no comparison between stent placement and open surgery. There is insufficient evidence with regards to the best treatment for coarctation of the thoracic aorta. This review... (Complete abstract click electronic access below)
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Aorta - Cirurgia - Técnica, Cardiopatia congenita, Coração - Anomalias, Aorta - Surgery
Como citar
RUBIRA, Cláudio José. Colocação de endoprótese vascular versus cirurgia para coarctação de aorta: revisão sistemática. 2012. 66 f. Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, 2012.