Efeito de diferentes taxas de resfriamento sobre a porcelana feldspática de cobertura para infraestrutura em zircônia
Carregando...
Data
2013-04-25
Autores
Almeida Junior, Antonio Alves de [UNESP]
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Resumo
A maior incidência de lascamentos na porcelana de cobertura é uma das principais desvantagens de restaurações com infraestrutura em zircônia se comparada com as metalocerâmicas. Essa maior ocorrência pode ser explicada por diferenças nas propriedades mecânicas das porcelanas indicadas para infraestrutura em zircônia ou por estresses residuais devido às propriedades térmicas dos materiais cerâmicos. Assim, este estudo apresentou os seguintes objetivos: 1. Comparar a resistência à flexão (MPa), confiabilidade pelo módulo de Weibull, dureza Vickers (VHN) e tenacidade à fratura (MPa/mm1/2) de duas porcelanas feldspáticas utilizadas sobre infraestrutura em zircônia (Vita VM9 e e.Max Ceram) e duas porcelanas feldspáticas utilizadas sobre infraestrutura metálica (Vita VMK95 e Duceragold); 2. Avaliar a resistência à fratura por flexão, confiabilidade, probabilidade de falha, dureza Vickers, tenacidade à fratura pelo método do entalhe em V e índice de cristalinidade por difratometria de raios-X de corpos-de-prova monocamada da porcelana Vita VM9 submetidos a três métodos de resfriamento; 3. Analisar a resistência à fratura por flexão, confiabilidade, resistência de cisalhamento da união e o modo de falha em corpos-de-prova bicamada de zircônia (ZrHP) e porcelana feldspática (Vita VM9) submetidos a diferentes taxas de resfriamento. No primeiro estudo, análises estatísticas de Kruskal Wallis e Dunn foram utilizadas(p<0,05). Não foi observada diferença estatística na resistência à flexão (p=0.31) entre as porcelanas. O módulo de Weibull apresentou maior confiabilidade para a porcelana VMK95 seguido por e.Max, Vita VM9 e Duceragold. No ensaio de dureza Vickers, as porcelanas e.Max, VM9 e VMK95 não apresentaram diferença estatística, enquanto a Duceragold apresentou o menor valor (p<0,001)...
The high incidence of chipping of the feldspathic porcelain veneer is one of the disadvantages of zirconia-based restorations in comparison to metal-based prosthesis. This highest occurrence may be explain by the difference in the mechanical proprieties of the porcelain to zirconia system or by the residual tensions due to thermal proprieties of ceramic materials. Then, the purpose of this study was: 1. To compare the three-point flexural strength (MPa), Weibull parameters, Vickers hardness (VHN) and Vickers indentation fracture toughness (MPa/mm1/2) of feldspathic porcelains for metal (Vita VMK95 and Duceragold) and for zirconia frameworks (Vita VM9 and e.Max Ceram); 2. To compare the flexural strength, reliability and probability of failure, measured by Weibull analysis, Vickers hardness, V-notch fracture toughness, and crystallinity index by Powder X-ray Diffractometry Technique of monolayer specimens of a dental feldspathic veneer porcelain for zirconia (VITA VM9) subjected to three different cooling conditions; 3. To investigate the effect of three cooling methods on the flexural strength, reliability, shear bond strength and failure mode of bilayer specimens of veneer porcelain (VITA VM9) and zirconia (ZrHP). In the first study, Kruskal-Wallis and Dun test were used for statistical analysis (p<0.05). There was no significant difference (p=0.31) among the porcelains in the flexural. Weibull calculation presented highest reliability for VMK95 followed by e.Max, VM9 and Duceragold. Vickers hardness test showed that e.Max, VM9 and VMK95 had no difference and Duceragold had the lowest value (p‹.001). The highest fracture toughness was to VMK95, while VM9 and e.Max had the lowest values (p‹.001). It was concluded that, despite of the suitable flexural strength, reliability... (Complete abstract click electronic access below)
The high incidence of chipping of the feldspathic porcelain veneer is one of the disadvantages of zirconia-based restorations in comparison to metal-based prosthesis. This highest occurrence may be explain by the difference in the mechanical proprieties of the porcelain to zirconia system or by the residual tensions due to thermal proprieties of ceramic materials. Then, the purpose of this study was: 1. To compare the three-point flexural strength (MPa), Weibull parameters, Vickers hardness (VHN) and Vickers indentation fracture toughness (MPa/mm1/2) of feldspathic porcelains for metal (Vita VMK95 and Duceragold) and for zirconia frameworks (Vita VM9 and e.Max Ceram); 2. To compare the flexural strength, reliability and probability of failure, measured by Weibull analysis, Vickers hardness, V-notch fracture toughness, and crystallinity index by Powder X-ray Diffractometry Technique of monolayer specimens of a dental feldspathic veneer porcelain for zirconia (VITA VM9) subjected to three different cooling conditions; 3. To investigate the effect of three cooling methods on the flexural strength, reliability, shear bond strength and failure mode of bilayer specimens of veneer porcelain (VITA VM9) and zirconia (ZrHP). In the first study, Kruskal-Wallis and Dun test were used for statistical analysis (p<0.05). There was no significant difference (p=0.31) among the porcelains in the flexural. Weibull calculation presented highest reliability for VMK95 followed by e.Max, VM9 and Duceragold. Vickers hardness test showed that e.Max, VM9 and VMK95 had no difference and Duceragold had the lowest value (p‹.001). The highest fracture toughness was to VMK95, while VM9 and e.Max had the lowest values (p‹.001). It was concluded that, despite of the suitable flexural strength, reliability... (Complete abstract click electronic access below)
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Cerâmica odontológica, Zirconio, Resistencia de materiais, Resistência ao cisalhamento, Resfriamento, Zirconium
Como citar
ALMEIDA JUNIOR, Antonio Alves de. Efeito de diferentes taxas de resfriamento sobre a porcelana feldspática de cobertura para infraestrutura em zircônia. 2013. 139 f. Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho, Faculdade de Odontologia (Campus de Araraquara), 2013.