O Zoledronato no tratamento da osteoporose umeral em ratas: estudo prospectivo e randomizado
Carregando...
Data
2010-01-01
Autores
Palacio, Evandro Pereira
Jacob, Eduardo Martinelli
Campi, Thiago Balthazar
Müller, Sérgio Swain [UNESP]
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
Resumo
OBJETIVO: Investigar as repercussões clínicas, biomecânicas e histomorfométricas do zoledronato no tratamento da osteoporose umeral em ratas osteoporóticas. MÉTODOS: Analisou-se, prospectivamente, 40 ratas (Rattus novergicus albinus). Com 60 dias de vida, foram aleatorizadas em dois grupos de acordo com o procedimento cirúrgico: ooforectomia bilateral (O) (n=20) e pseudo-cirurgia (P) (n=20). Após trinta dias, os animais foram novamente randomizados, de acordo com a administração de 0,1mg/kg de zoledronato (AZ) ou água destilada (AD): OAZ (n=10), OAD (n=10), PAZ (n=10) e PAD (n=10). Após doze meses, os animais foram eutanasiados e seus úmeros retirados. Clinicamente considerou-se o peso dos animais; biomecanicamente foram realizados ensaios compressivos e histomorfometricamente foi determinada a área trabecular óssea. RESULTADOS: Os grupos O tiveram um aumento de peso maior que os grupos P (p=0,005). Os grupos com zoledronato suportaram maior carga máxima que os grupos com água destilada (p=0,02). Nos grupos com zoledronato verificou-se o aumento da área trabecular óssea quando comparados aos grupos com água destilada (p=0,001). Houve correlação positiva entre a área trabecular e a carga máxima (p=0,04; r=0,95). CONCLUSÃO: O zoledronato não influiu no peso dos animais. Os resultados mostraram o aumento da resistência óssea umeral e da área trabecular óssea.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical, biomechanical and histomorphometric effects of zoledronate in the humerus of ovariectomized rats. METHODS: Forty female rats (Rattus norvegicus albinus) were prospectively evaluated. Within 60 days, animals were randomized into two groups: ovariectomy (O) (n=20) or sham surgery (P) (n=20). Within 90 days, groups O and P were subdivided into four groups, according to the administration of zoledronate (AZ) or deionized water (AD): OAZ (n=10), OAD (n=10), PAZ (n=10) and PAD (n=10). Within 15 months, animals were sacrificed. Body weight was used for clinical study, axial compression tests for the biomechanical study and cancellous bone area for the histomorphometric study. RESULTS: Ovariectomized groups had greater body weight gain than the sham groups (p=0.005). Zoledronate groups had greater body weight gain compared to the deionized water groups (p=0.68). Maximum load support was greater in the groups treated with zoledronate (p=0.02). An increase in cancellous bone area was noted in the groups treated with zoledronate (p=0.001). A positive correlation was shown in the evaluation of cancellous area and maximum load (p=0.04; r=0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Zoledronate had no effect on animals' body weight. Groups treated with zoledronate had increased maximum load support and cancellous bone area.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical, biomechanical and histomorphometric effects of zoledronate in the humerus of ovariectomized rats. METHODS: Forty female rats (Rattus norvegicus albinus) were prospectively evaluated. Within 60 days, animals were randomized into two groups: ovariectomy (O) (n=20) or sham surgery (P) (n=20). Within 90 days, groups O and P were subdivided into four groups, according to the administration of zoledronate (AZ) or deionized water (AD): OAZ (n=10), OAD (n=10), PAZ (n=10) and PAD (n=10). Within 15 months, animals were sacrificed. Body weight was used for clinical study, axial compression tests for the biomechanical study and cancellous bone area for the histomorphometric study. RESULTS: Ovariectomized groups had greater body weight gain than the sham groups (p=0.005). Zoledronate groups had greater body weight gain compared to the deionized water groups (p=0.68). Maximum load support was greater in the groups treated with zoledronate (p=0.02). An increase in cancellous bone area was noted in the groups treated with zoledronate (p=0.001). A positive correlation was shown in the evaluation of cancellous area and maximum load (p=0.04; r=0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Zoledronate had no effect on animals' body weight. Groups treated with zoledronate had increased maximum load support and cancellous bone area.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Osteoporose, Menopausa, Terapêutica, Biomecânica, Osteoporosis, Menopause, Therapeutics, Biomechanics
Como citar
Acta Ortopédica Brasileira. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, v. 18, n. 2, p. 90-95, 2010.