Surface roughness analysis of dental ceramics treated with hydrofl uoric acid and aluminum oxide jet
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Data
2014
Autores
Porto, Thiago Soares [UNESP]
Tonetto, Mateus Rodrigues [UNESP]
Lorenzetti, Camila Cruz [UNESP]
Bandéca, Matheus Coelho
Borges, Alvaro Henrique
Porto Neto, Sizenando de Toledo [UNESP]
Campos, Edson Alves de [UNESP]
Dinelli, Wellington [UNESP]
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Resumo
The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface roughness of 5 indirect restorative materials treated with hydrofluoric acid to 10%, with aluminum oxide jet and a combination of both. The specimens was prepared with 10 mm in diameter and 2 mm thickness, divided into fi ve groups: (1) Ceromer (CeseadII-Kuraray), (2) Leucite crystals ceramics (IPS EmpressIIIvoclarforcasket), (3) glass ceramic with fluorapatite (IPS D. Sign-Ivoclar), (4) lithium disilicate ceramic (IPS Empress II-Ivoclar restorations), (5) ceramics (Cergogold-Degussa). For all groups were performed the controls, and the surfaces with the 3 types of treatment. For testing roughness used the rugosimeter Taylor/Hobson-Precision, model form tracerSV-C525 high sensitivity. After confi rmation of variance analysis with a signifi cance level of 1% (p < 0.01), there was equality between the average roughness of materials from groups 1, 3 and 5, and the group 2 was different from the others. It was also found that the ceramics of the group 5 behaved similar to group 4. However the lowest average roughness was observed in group 2 ceramic. In the evaluation between the types of treatment, the aluminum oxide jet and associations and blasting with hydrofl uoric acid were similar, and different isolated hydrofl uoric acid, and 3 types of treatment signifi cantly higher than the control group. All treatments promoted superfi cial alterations in all tested materials.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Laboratory research, Hydrofluoric acid, Aluminum oxide
Como citar
World Journal of Dentistry, v. 5, n. 1, p. 1-5, 2014.