Publicação: Thermoresistance sperm tests are not predictive of potential fertility for cryopreserved bull semen
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Data
2009-06-01
Orientador
Coorientador
Pós-graduação
Curso de graduação
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Elsevier B.V.
Tipo
Artigo
Direito de acesso
Acesso restrito
Resumo
Different studies demonstrate positive correlations between seminal variables determined in the laboratory and subsequent fertility after artificial insemination. It is clear, however, that there is still a deficiency in predicting in vivo fertility results of semen samples. The present study intended to verify the efficiency of rapid and slow thermoresistance tests in predicting fertility of frozen semen of bulls. Sperm from 64 ejaculates of 39 Nelore bulls (Bos indicus), aged 2-10 years, were cryopreserved in 0.5mL straws. Thawed straws containing 30 x 10(6) sperm were analyzed for seminal variables in the laboratory and used to inseminate 4920 cows to evaluate fertility in the field. The ejaculates were frozen in a Tris-based extender and samples were evaluated for total motility after rapid (46 degrees C/30 min) and slow (38 degrees C/5 h) thermoresistance tests by conventional and computerized (CASA) methods. Sperm samples were grouped according to their ability to retain motility after thermoresistance testing: group 0 (0% motility), group 1 (1-20% total motility), group 2 (21-40% total motility) and group 3 (>40% total motility). Correlation and association between these groups and fertility diagnosed by rectal palpation at 90 days were verified. Chisquare test demonstrated no association between motility groups and fertility (P>0.25) and both rapid and slow thermoresistance tests had a lesser correlation to fertility (r=0.11 and 0.14, respectively). These results demonstrated that these tests are not reliable in predicting in vivo behavior of bull frozen semen and are not effective to estimate fertility. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Idioma
Inglês
Como citar
Animal Reproduction Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V., v. 113, n. 1-4, p. 279-282, 2009.
