Resin Bonding to a Feldspar Ceramic After Different Ceramic Surface Conditioning Methods: Evaluation of Contact Angle, Surface pH, and Microtensile Bond Strength Durability
Carregando...
Fonte externa
Fonte externa
Data
Orientador
Coorientador
Pós-graduação
Curso de graduação
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Quintessence Publishing Co Inc
Tipo
Artigo
Direito de acesso
Acesso restrito
Fonte externa
Fonte externa
Resumo
Purpose: To evaluate the surface pH, contact angle and microtensile bond strength (MTBS) of a resin-cement to feldspathic ceramic after various surface conditioning methods (SC).Materials and Methods: For pH measurements, 96 glass-ceramic disks were assigned into 12 groups (n = 8): SC-pH: No ceramic surface conditioning (control); SC2-pH: hydrofluoric-acid (HF) 9% 1 min; SC3-pH: SC2-pH+wash/dry; SC4-pH: SC3-pH+silane; SC5-pH: HF 4% 1 min; SC6-pH: SC5-pH+wash/dry; SC7-pH: SC6-pH+silane; SC8-pH: HF 5% 1 min; SC9-pH: SC8-pH+wash/dry; SC10-pH: SC9-pH+silane; SC11-pH: SC9-pH+neutralizer+wash/dry+sonic-cleaning; SC12-pH: SC11-pH+silane. For contact angle analysis, 40 disks were divided into 5 groups (n = 8): SC1-ca: no conditioning; SC2-ca: HF 9%+wash/dry; SC3-ca: HF 4%+wash/dry; SC4-Ca: HF 5%+wash/dry; SC5-ca: HF 5%+neutralizer+wash/dry+ultrasonic-cleaning. To evaluate the MTBS, 40 blocks were distributed into 4 groups SC (N = 10): SC1-bond: HF 9% 1 min+silane; SC2-bond: HF 4% 1 min+silane; SC3-bond: HF 5% 1 min+silane; SC4-bond: HF 5% 1 min+neutralizer+wash/dry+ultrasonic cleaning+silane. The resin cement was applied on the treated surfaces and bar specimens were produced that were submitted to 2 conditions: dry: immediate MTBS; TC: storage for 150 days and thermocycling 5000x. Fifty bar specimens were produced per group (n = 50). Contact angle and pHresults were submitted to one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (alpha = 0.05). Microtensile data were submitted to two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (alpha = 0.05). Results: pH values were significantly higher for SC6-ph (11.5 +/- 2.6) when compared to those of SC5-pH (2.7 +/- 0.4), SC8-pH (2.7 +/- 0.2) and SC2-pH (2.2 +/- 0.2) (p < 0.00, ANOVA). SC1-ca had the largest contact angle (48 16 degrees) and SC3-ca the smallest (9.4 +/- 7.7 degrees). The results of the MTBS test were as follows: independent of the storage condition, SC2-bond = SC1-bond > SC3-bond = SC4-bond. SC4-bond had the lowest MTBS value after TC (10.6 +/- 2.6 MPa).Conclusion: The acid neutralization step appears to be dispensable, since the washing/drying promoted similar pH values. That condition promoted a high contact angle and unstable resin microtensile bond strength to glass ceramic.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
glass ceramic, resin cement, pH, contact angle, bond durability
Idioma
Inglês
Citação
Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. Hanover Park: Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, v. 13, n. 6, p. 551-560, 2011.
