Análise econômica de cultivos consorciados de alface americana x rabanete: um estudo de caso
Carregando...
Data
2005-07-01
Autores
Rezende, Bráulio Luciano A. [UNESP]
Cecílio Filho, Arthur B. [UNESP]
Fábio, Catelan [UNESP]
Martins, Maria Inez E. G. [UNESP]
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Associação Brasileira de Horticultura
Resumo
O trabalho foi realizado para verificar se cultivos consorciados de alface e de rabanete são economicamente viáveis. Foram elaborados os custos de produção das culturas em monocultivo e em consorciação. Alguns indicadores agroeconômicos foram usados para avaliar a eficiência dos sistemas consorciados: índice de uso eficiente da terra, receita bruta, receita líquida, vantagem monetária, vantagem monetária corrigida, taxa de retorno e índice de lucratividade. A associação das culturas da alface e rabanete permitiu um melhor aproveitamento dos fatores de produção, com aumento na produção por unidade de área. Os consórcios estabelecidos ao zero (espaçamento entrelinha 0,30 x 0,30 m) e aos 14 dias após o transplantio da alface (espaçamento entrelinhas de 0,40 x 0,30m) tiveram os melhores indicadores agroeconômicos, com índices de uso eficiente da terra de 1,76 e 1,61, taxas de retorno de 4,13 e 4,53, e índices de lucratividade de 75,77 e 77,94%, respectivamente.
Our aim was to verify if intercropping systems of crisphead lettuce and radish were economically viable. The costs of production of the cultures were evaluated in monoculture and in intercropping. Some agrieconomic indicators were used to evaluate the efficiency of the systems such as the appropriate use of the land gross and net revenue, monetary advantage, corrected monetary advantage, rate of return and profit margin were used to evaluated the efficiency of intercropping systems. The association of the lettuce and radish allowed a better use of the production factors, with increase in the production per unit of area. The intercropping systems established in 0 (spacing between rows of 0.30 x 0.30 m) and to 14 (spacing between rows of 0.40 x 0.30 m) days after the transplant of crisphead lettuce presented the best agrieconomics indicators, with land equivalent ratios of 1.76 and 1.61, rates of return of 4.13 and 4.53, and profit margins of 75.77% and 77.94%, respectively.
Our aim was to verify if intercropping systems of crisphead lettuce and radish were economically viable. The costs of production of the cultures were evaluated in monoculture and in intercropping. Some agrieconomic indicators were used to evaluate the efficiency of the systems such as the appropriate use of the land gross and net revenue, monetary advantage, corrected monetary advantage, rate of return and profit margin were used to evaluated the efficiency of intercropping systems. The association of the lettuce and radish allowed a better use of the production factors, with increase in the production per unit of area. The intercropping systems established in 0 (spacing between rows of 0.30 x 0.30 m) and to 14 (spacing between rows of 0.40 x 0.30 m) days after the transplant of crisphead lettuce presented the best agrieconomics indicators, with land equivalent ratios of 1.76 and 1.61, rates of return of 4.13 and 4.53, and profit margins of 75.77% and 77.94%, respectively.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Lactuca sativa, Raphanus sativus, profitability, agrieconomic efficiency, Lactuca sativa, Raphanus sativus, Rentabilidade, eficiência agroeconômica
Como citar
Horticultura Brasileira. Associação Brasileira de Horticultura, v. 23, n. 3, p. 853-858, 2005.