Electromyographic validation of basic exercises for physical conditioning programmes V. The comparison of the response in the deltoid muscle (anterior portion) and the pectoralis major muscle (clavicular portion) determined by the frontal-lateral cross, dumbbells and the rowing exercises

Nenhuma Miniatura disponível

Data

2003-03-01

Autores

Ferreira, M. I.
Büll, Marilena Longo [UNESP]
Vitti, M.

Título da Revista

ISSN da Revista

Título de Volume

Editor

Resumo

The action potential level for shoulder muscles deltoid-anterior portion (DA) and pectoralis major-clavicular portion (PMC) determined by four different modalities of execution of rowing exercises, each one with two different grips, was recorded. These were compared with the action potential level determined for the same muscles by four different modalities of execution of the frontal-lateral cross, dumbbells exercises. Twenty-four male volunteers were examined using a 2 channel TECA TE4 electromyograph and Hewlett Packard surface electrodes. The statistic analysis showed significant (p<0,05) superiority for all the frontal-lateral cross, dumbbells exercises in comparison to all rowing exercises for the PMC, for the DA this generalized supremacy was not observed.

Descrição

Palavras-chave

Electromyography, Exercises, M. deltoid, M. pectoralis major, Physical conditioning, adolescent, adult, clavicle, comparative study, controlled study, deltoid muscle, electrode, electromyography, grip strength, human, human experiment, male, muscle action potential, muscle contraction, muscle exercise, normal human, pectoralis major muscle, physical capacity, shoulder, statistical analysis, validation process, action potential, arm, exercise, fitness, hand grip, physiology, reference value, reproducibility, skeletal muscle, weight lifting, Action Potentials, Adolescent, Adult, Arm, Exercise, Hand Strength, Humans, Male, Muscle Contraction, Muscle, Skeletal, Pectoralis Muscles, Physical Fitness, Reference Values, Reproducibility of Results, Shoulder, Weight Lifting

Como citar

Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology, v. 43, n. 2, p. 75-79, 2003.