Publicação: Thermoeconomic model considering the environment impacts on thermoelectric power plants: Natural gas versus diesel
Carregando...
Data
Orientador
Coorientador
Pós-graduação
Curso de graduação
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Tipo
Trabalho apresentado em evento
Direito de acesso
Acesso aberto
Resumo
In this paper a comparative analysis of the environmental impact caused by the use of natural gas and diesel in thermoelectric power plants utilizing combined cycle is performed. The objective is to apply a thermoeconomical analysis in order to compare the two proposed fuels. In this analysis, a new methodology that incorporates the economical engineering concept to the ecological efficiency once Cardu and Baica [1, 2], which evaluates, in general terms, the environmental impacts caused by CO2, SO2, NOx and Particulate Matter (PM), adopting as reference the air quality standards in vigour is employed. The thermoeconomic model herein proposed utilizes functional diagrams that allow the minimization the Exergetic Manufacturing Cost, which represents the cost of production of electricity incorporating the environmental impact effects to study the performance of the thermoelectric power plant [3,4], It follows that it is possible to determine the environmental impact caused by thermoelectric power plants and, under the ecological standpoint, the use of natural gas as a fuel is the best option compared to the use of the diesel, presenting ecological efficiency values of 0.944 and 0.914 respectively. From the Exergoeconomic point of view of, it was found out that the EMC (Exergetic Manufacturing Cost) is better when natural gas is used as fuel compared to the diesel fuel. Copyright © 2006 by ASME.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Ecological efficiency, Environmental impact, Thermoeconomical analysis, Exergetic Manufacturing Cost (EMC), Diesel fuels, Mathematical models, Natural gas, Particles (particulate matter), Thermoelectricity, Power plants
Idioma
Inglês
Como citar
Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo, v. 2, p. 945-951.
