Publicação: Why entanglement of formation is not generally monogamous
Carregando...
Data
2013-03-13
Orientador
Coorientador
Pós-graduação
Curso de graduação
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Tipo
Artigo
Direito de acesso
Acesso abertodata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0327/b03279416a16e6d2817632486050c178896ba2ad" alt="Acesso Aberto"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0327/b03279416a16e6d2817632486050c178896ba2ad" alt="Acesso Aberto"
Resumo
Unlike correlation of classical systems, entanglement of quantum systems cannot be distributed at will: if one system A is maximally entangled with another system B, it cannot be entangled at all with a third system C. This concept, known as the monogamy of entanglement, is manifest when the entanglement of A with a pair BC can be divided as contributions of the entanglement between A and B and A and C, plus a term τABC involving genuine tripartite entanglement and so expected to be always positive. A very important measure in quantum information theory, the entanglement of formation (EOF), fails to satisfy this last requirement. Here we present the reasons for that and show a set of conditions that an arbitrary pure tripartite state must satisfy for the EOF to become a monogamous measure, i.e., for τABC≥0. The relation derived is connected to the discrepancy between quantum and classical correlations, τABC being negative whenever the quantum correlation prevails over the classical one. This result is employed to elucidate features of the distribution of entanglement during a dynamical evolution. It also helps to relate all monogamous instances of the EOF to the squashed sntanglement, an entanglement measure that is always monogamous. © 2013 American Physical Society.
Descrição
Idioma
Inglês
Como citar
Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, v. 87, n. 3, 2013.