Métodos não convencionais para avaliação da porosidade e da densidade do solo de um latossolo vermelho
Carregando...
Arquivos
Data
2005-01-28
Autores
Encide, Ana Paula [UNESP]
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Resumo
O objetivo deste trabalho foi comparar dois métodos de análise para densidade do solo (anel volumétrico e tomografia computadorizada) e dois métodos para porosidade (mesa de tensão e análise de imagens de blocos) em um LATOSSOLO VERMELHO. A pesquisa foi conduzida na Fazenda Experimental Lageado-FCA/UNESP, Botucatu-SP. O delineamento experimental foi o de blocos casualizados com 4 repetições. Com exceção das imagens de blocos os demais dados foram submetidos ao teste F para análise de variância e ao teste de Tukey para a comparação de médias a 5% de probabilidade. As amostras foram coletadas na profundidade de 0-0,20 m em semeadura direta, sistema de preparo convencional e parcela com vegetação natural. A densidade do solo determinada pelo método do anel volumétrico apresentou diferenças para os sistemas de semeadura direta e preparo convencional e o sistema mata, para as camadas de 0-0,05; 0,05-0,10 e 0,10- 0,15 m. O método da tomografia computadorizada apresentou diferença para densidade do solo entre os sistemas de preparo convencional e vegetação natural e a semeadura direta, para a camada de 0-0,20 m. O método do anel volumétrico superestimou os valores de densidade, nas camadas de 0-0,05 e 0,05-0,10 m, comparado com o método da tomografia computadorizada, cujos resultados foram coerentes como os de resistência à penetração. O coeficiente de variação relativo aos valores de densidade do solo foram menores para o método da tomografia computadorizada em comparação com o método do anel volumétrico. O método da mesa de tensão não apresentou diferenças significativas para macroporosidade para os sistemas de manejo. O método de análise de imagens evidenciou diferenças entre a semeadura direta e vegetação natural e preparo convencional.
The objective of this research was to compare two methods for soil density (core sampling and computed tomography) and two methods for porosity (tension column and blocks image analysis) measured in a red latosol (Orthox). The experiment was carried out in Lageado Experimental Farm, FCA/UNESP in Botucatu city, State of São Paulo in a randomized block design with four replicates. With exception of the blocks image analysis, data were submitted to test F for variance analysis and Tukey test for the means comparison with 5% of probability. The samples were collected in layers of 0-0.20m of profundity under no tillage, conventional tillage and natural vegetation systems. Core sampling method resulted in difference in the soil density among the systems of no tillage, conventional tillage and natural vegetation for the layers of 0-0.05; 0.05-0.10 and 0.10-0.15m. The computed tomography method showed difference in the soil density between conventional tillage, natural vegetation and no tillage system for the layer of 0-0.20m. The core sampling method overestimated the values of soil density, in the layers of 0-0.05 and 0.05-0.10m, considering that the results obtained through computed tomography method whose results were coherent with the soil penetration resistance ones. The variation coefficient related to the values of soil density was smaller for the method of the computed tomography related to the core sampling method. Tension table method didn't result in macro porosity difference among the tillage systems. Blocks image analysis method evidenced difference among the systems of no tillage, natural vegetation and conventional tillage.
The objective of this research was to compare two methods for soil density (core sampling and computed tomography) and two methods for porosity (tension column and blocks image analysis) measured in a red latosol (Orthox). The experiment was carried out in Lageado Experimental Farm, FCA/UNESP in Botucatu city, State of São Paulo in a randomized block design with four replicates. With exception of the blocks image analysis, data were submitted to test F for variance analysis and Tukey test for the means comparison with 5% of probability. The samples were collected in layers of 0-0.20m of profundity under no tillage, conventional tillage and natural vegetation systems. Core sampling method resulted in difference in the soil density among the systems of no tillage, conventional tillage and natural vegetation for the layers of 0-0.05; 0.05-0.10 and 0.10-0.15m. The computed tomography method showed difference in the soil density between conventional tillage, natural vegetation and no tillage system for the layer of 0-0.20m. The core sampling method overestimated the values of soil density, in the layers of 0-0.05 and 0.05-0.10m, considering that the results obtained through computed tomography method whose results were coherent with the soil penetration resistance ones. The variation coefficient related to the values of soil density was smaller for the method of the computed tomography related to the core sampling method. Tension table method didn't result in macro porosity difference among the tillage systems. Blocks image analysis method evidenced difference among the systems of no tillage, natural vegetation and conventional tillage.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Solos - Densidade, Solos - Porosidade, Solos - Manejo, Tomografia, Diagnóstico por imagem, Computed tomography, Soil density, Porosity, Bocks image analysis, Management systems
Como citar
ENCIDE, Ana Paula. Métodos não convencionais para avaliação da porosidade e da densidade do solo de um latossolo vermelho. 2005. xi, 78 f. Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas, 2005.