Effect of surface treatments on the shear bond strength of luting cements to Y-TZP ceramic

dc.contributor.authorSciasci, Plínio [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAbi-Rached, Filipe Oliveira [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAdabo, Gelson Luis [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBaldissara, Paolo
dc.contributor.authorFonseca, Renata Garcia [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUnivesity of Bologna
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-06T16:13:11Z
dc.date.available2015-08-06T16:13:11Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractStatement of problem Because zirconia is a glass-free material, alternative surface treatments such as airborne-particle abrasion or silica coating should be used for long-term bonding. However, these surface treatments in combination with different bonding agents and luting cements have not yet been studied. Purpose The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of surface treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) of luting cements to Y-TZP ceramic. Material and methods Zirconia disks (N=240) were airborne-particle abraded with the following particles (n=48): 50 μm Al2O3; 120 μm Al2O3; 30 μm silica-coated Al2O3 (Rocatec Soft); 120 μm Al2O3+110 μm silica-coated Al2O3 (Rocatec Plus); and Rocatec Plus. After silanization of the zirconia surface, composite resin disks were bonded with (n=12) RelyX Luting 2; RelyX ARC; RelyX U100; and Panavia F. The bonded specimens were thermocycled (10 000 cycles) and tested for SBS. Failure mode was determined with a stereomicroscope (×20). The morphology and elemental composition of airborne-particle abraded surfaces were evaluated with scanning electron microscopy (×500) and energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (×50). Results Surface treatments, cements, and their interaction were significant (P<.001). For RelyX ARC, Rocatec Soft and Rocatec Plus provided the highest SBS. In general, surface treatments did not influence the SBS of RelyX U100 and Panavia F. Regardless of the cement, no significant difference was found between 50 μm and 120 μm Al2O3 particles, between Rocatec Soft and Rocatec Plus, or between Rocatec Plus and 120 μm Al2O3 particles+Rocatec Plus. All groups showed adhesive failures. Different particle sizes provided differences in morphological patterns. The elemental composition comprised Al and Al/Si for alumina and silica-abraded zirconia. Conclusions Particle size did not influence the SBS of the groups abraded exclusively with alumina or silica-coated particles. RelyX ARC was more surface-treatment dependent than RelyX U100 or Panavia F.en
dc.description.affiliationUniversity of Bologna, Department of Oral Sciences, Division of Prosthodontics
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Departamento de Materiais Odontológicos e Prótese, Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara
dc.format.extent212-219
dc.identifierhttp://www.thejpd.org/article/S0022-3913(14)00465-X/abstract
dc.identifier.citationThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, v. 113, n. 3, p. 212-219, 2015.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.09.012
dc.identifier.issn0022-3913
dc.identifier.lattes3041561340615890
dc.identifier.lattes2851339311179809
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/125813
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
dc.relation.ispartofjcr2.347
dc.relation.ispartofsjr1,087
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceCurrículo Lattes
dc.subjectZircôniapt
dc.subjectCerâmicas dentáriaspt
dc.subjectCimentos resinosospt
dc.subjectAdesão|Prótese dentáriapt
dc.subjectMateriais odontológicospt
dc.titleEffect of surface treatments on the shear bond strength of luting cements to Y-TZP ceramicen
dc.typeArtigo
unesp.author.lattes3041561340615890
unesp.author.lattes2851339311179809
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-0734-7926[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-6657-913X[5]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquarapt
unesp.departmentMateriais Odontológicos e Prótesept

Arquivos