Healing Patterns After Subgingival Placement of a Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Restoration: A Histometric Study in Dogs

dc.contributor.authorSantamaria, Mauro Pedrine [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSuaid, Fabricia Ferreira
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho, Marcelo Diniz
dc.contributor.authorNociti Junior, Francisco Humberto
dc.contributor.authorCasati, Marcio Zaffalon
dc.contributor.authorSallum, Antonio Wilson
dc.contributor.authorSallum, Enilson Antonio
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-03T13:07:09Z
dc.date.available2014-12-03T13:07:09Z
dc.date.issued2013-09-01
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate, clinically and histometrically, the effects of subgingival placement of a resin-modified glass-ionomer restoration during flap surgery. Nine dogs were included in this study. The mandibular canines were randomly assigned to receive either a transgingival resin-modified glass-ionomer restoration (test group) or no restoration (control group). The apical margins of the restorations in the test group and a reference notch on those in the control group were placed at the level of the bone crest. Clinical parameters were recorded 7 days before sacrifice. The dogs were sacrificed after 107 days, and undecalcified sections were obtained for histologic evaluation. Clinically, both groups presented significant clinical attachment loss and an increase in probing depth, but differences between groups were not statistically significant (P > .05). Histologically, a significant difference between groups was observed for length of epithelium (test, 4.05 +/- 0.57 mm; control, 3.36 +/- 0.63 mm; P = .01). The test group showed more bone resorption (2.02 +/- 1.47 mm) when compared with the control group (0.74 +/- 0.37 mm) (P = .048). It can be concluded that even with the claimed favorable properties of resin-modified glass ionomer, the presence of the restoration within the biologic width causes increased migration of the apical epithelium and bone resorption.en
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista UNESP, Coll Dent FOSJC, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Campinas UNICAMP, Dept Periodont & Prosthodont, Div Periodont, Piracicaba Dent Sch, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista UNESP, Coll Dent FOSJC, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.format.extent679-U137
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.11607/prd.0396
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry. Hanover Park: Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, v. 33, n. 5, p. 679-U137, 2013.
dc.identifier.issn0198-7569
dc.identifier.lattes7008114923397947
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/111306
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000323537200016
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherQuintessence Publishing Co Inc
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry
dc.relation.ispartofjcr1.249
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,749
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.titleHealing Patterns After Subgingival Placement of a Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Restoration: A Histometric Study in Dogsen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.rightsHolderQuintessence Publishing Co Inc
unesp.author.lattes7008114923397947
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, São José dos Campospt

Arquivos