Thickness and marking quality of different occlusal contact registration strips

dc.contributor.authorToledo, Maria Fernanda De Souza Mauá Serapião
dc.contributor.authorJóias, Renata Pilli [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMarques-iasi, Yves Santini
dc.contributor.authorNeves, Ana Christina Claro
dc.contributor.authorRode, Sigmar de Mello [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionSão Paulo
dc.contributor.institutionUniv. Estadual Paulista Science and Technology Institute School of Dentistry
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Taubaté Department of Dentistry
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-19T16:20:28Z
dc.date.available2015-03-19T16:20:28Z
dc.date.issued2014-12-01
dc.description.abstractObjectiveEvaluate the thickness and the marking quality of different occlusal contact registration strips (OCRS) and a possible correlation between them. Material and MethodThe following OCRS were selected: Accufilm II, BK20, BK21, BK22, BK23, BK28, and BK31. The thickness was measured in three points of the OCRS with an electronic measuring device (TESA), and the mean was calculated. To produce the marks on the strips, composite resin specimens were adapted to a universal testing machine (Versat 2000) with 40 kgf load cell at a speed of 1.0 mm/min. The mark images were photographed with a stereoscopic microscope (Stemi SV11) and processed and analyzed by the 550-Leica Qwin® analyzer. ResultValues (μm) found in the 1st and 2nd thickness measurements were: Accufilm II - 16.4 and 14.2; BK20 - 10.0 and 8.1; BK21 - 9.5 and 8.0; BK22 - 9.7 and 8.7; BK23 - 9.8 and 7.9; BK28 - 12.8 and 10.0; and BK31 - 8.4 and 8.0, respectively. The mean (mm2) values found in the mark areas were: Accufilm II - 0.078; BK20 - 0.035; BK21 - 0.045; BK22 - 0.012; BK23 - 0.022; BK28 - 0.024; and BK31 - 0.024. The results were submitted to the Kruskal-Wallis (p<0.05) and Pearson’s correlation tests. ConclusionOnly in the 2nd measurement, the OCRS thickness observed was similar to the value indicated by the manufacturers; the Accufilm II and the BK28 strips showed the better marks; and no correlation was found between the thickness and the marking area.en
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo
dc.description.affiliationUniv. Estadual Paulista Science and Technology Institute School of Dentistry
dc.description.affiliationUniversity of Taubaté Department of Dentistry
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual Paulista Science and Technology Institute School of Dentistry
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista Science and Technology Institute School of Dentistry
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.format.extent516-521
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720140117
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Applied Oral Science. Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP, v. 22, n. 6, p. 516-521, 2014.
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/1678-775720140117
dc.identifier.fileS1678-77572014000600516.pdf
dc.identifier.issn1678-7757
dc.identifier.lattes3422118958429909
dc.identifier.scieloS1678-77572014000600516
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/117914
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherFaculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Applied Oral Science
dc.relation.ispartofjcr1.709
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,645
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceSciELO
dc.subjectDental occlusionen
dc.subjectOcclusal adjustmenten
dc.subjectProsthodonticsen
dc.subjectDentistryen
dc.subjectOral diagnosisen
dc.titleThickness and marking quality of different occlusal contact registration stripsen
dc.typeArtigo
unesp.author.lattes3422118958429909
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-4261-4217[5]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, São José dos Campospt

Arquivos

Pacote Original
Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
S1678-77572014000600516.pdf
Tamanho:
2.03 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format