The effect of CO 2 laser irradiation on failed implant surfaces

dc.contributor.authorShibli, Jamil Awad
dc.contributor.authorTheodoro, Letícia Helena [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorHaypek, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorGarcia, Valdir Gouveia [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMarcantonio Júnior, Elcio [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionGuarulhos University
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de Marília (UNIMAR)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Guarulhos
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:21:12Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:21:12Z
dc.date.issued2004-12-01
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this investigation was to evaluate the cleaning effect of CO 2 on surface topography and composition of failed dental implant surfaces. Ten failed dental implants were retrieved from nine patients (mean age, 46.33 ± 5.81 years) as a result of early or late failure. The implants were divided into two parts: one side of the implant was irradiated with a CO 2 laser (test side), while the other side did not receive irradiation (control side). The CO 2 laser was operated at 1.2 W in a continuous wave for 40 seconds (40 J energy). The handpiece of the CO 2 laser was kept at a distance of 30 mm from the implant surface, resulting in a spot area of 0.031415 cm 2 (38.20 W/cm 2; 1559 J/cm 2) in scanning mode (cervical-apical). One unused dental implant was used as a negative control for both groups. All implant surfaces were examined by scanning electron mi croscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive spectrometer x-ray (EDS) for element analysis. SEM showed that the surface of the test sides consisted of different degrees of organic residues, appearing mainly as dark stains similar to those observed on the control sides. None of the test surfaces presented alterations such as crater-like alterations, lava-like layers, or melting compared with the nonirradiated surfaces. Foreign elements such as carbon, oxygen, sodium, calcium, and aluminum were detected on both sides. These results suggest that CO 2 laser irradiation does not modify the implant surface, although the cleaning effect was not satisfactory.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Periodontology Dental Research Division Guarulhos University, Guarulhos, SP
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Periodontology Dental School at Araraquara State University of Sao Paulo-UNESP, Araraquara, SP
dc.description.affiliationExp. Lab. Laser in Dentistry-LELO Dental School of Sao Paulo University of Sao Paulo, USP
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Periodontology Dental School at Araçatuba State University of Sao Paulo-UNESP, Araçatuba, SP
dc.description.affiliationDental School of Marília University of Marília, Marília, SP
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Periodontology Dental School at Araraquara State Univ. of São Paulo-UNESP, Araraquara, SP
dc.description.affiliationCtro. de Pos-Graduacao Pesquisa e Extensão-CEPPE Universidade Guarulhos, Praça Tereza Cristina 1, 07023-070 Guarulhos-SP
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Periodontology Dental School at Araraquara State University of Sao Paulo-UNESP, Araraquara, SP
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Periodontology Dental School at Araçatuba State University of Sao Paulo-UNESP, Araçatuba, SP
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Periodontology Dental School at Araraquara State Univ. of São Paulo-UNESP, Araraquara, SP
dc.format.extent342-351
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000148553.06311.f1
dc.identifier.citationImplant Dentistry, v. 13, n. 4, p. 342-351, 2004.
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/01.id.0000148553.06311.f1
dc.identifier.issn1056-6163
dc.identifier.lattes6100859465871929
dc.identifier.lattes4774447118127346
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-11444259656
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/67967
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofImplant Dentistry
dc.relation.ispartofjcr1.307
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,712
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCo 2 laser
dc.subjectDental implants
dc.subjectFailures
dc.subjectPeri-implantitis
dc.subjectScanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
dc.subjectTitanium
dc.subjectaluminum
dc.subjectcalcium
dc.subjectcarbon
dc.subjectcarbon dioxide
dc.subjectoxygen
dc.subjectsodium
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectaged
dc.subjectclinical article
dc.subjectenergy
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectirradiation
dc.subjectlaser
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectscanning electron microscope
dc.subjectspectrometry
dc.subjectsurface property
dc.subjecttooth implantation
dc.subjecttopography
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectCarbon Dioxide
dc.subjectDental Implantation, Endosseous
dc.subjectDental Implants
dc.subjectDental Restoration Failure
dc.subjectDevice Removal
dc.subjectElectron Probe Microanalysis
dc.subjectEquipment Contamination
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectLasers
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMicroscopy, Electron, Scanning
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectOxides
dc.subjectSurface Properties
dc.titleThe effect of CO 2 laser irradiation on failed implant surfacesen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.licensehttp://edmgr.ovid.com/spine/accounts/copyrightTransfer.pdf
unesp.author.lattes6100859465871929
unesp.author.lattes4774447118127346
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquarapt

Arquivos