Clinical feasibility of cognitive testing in dogs (Canis lupus familiaris)

dc.contributor.authorHeckler, Marta C. T. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorTranquilim, Marcos V. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSvicero, Denis J. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBarbosa, Luciano [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAmorim, Rogerio M. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-03T13:10:51Z
dc.date.available2014-12-03T13:10:51Z
dc.date.issued2014-01-01
dc.description.abstractSeveral cognitive tests have been developed to evaluate specific aspects of human and animal learning and memory. These tests have been used for early detection of cognitive deficits and to monitor the treatment of dogs with cognitive impairment. Thus, this article evaluated the feasibility of cognitive tests for use in canine neurology clinical routines and the suitability of the different tests to accomplish this aim. Fifteen healthy adult dogs were used for the cognitive tests of reward approach learning, object approach learning, object discrimination learning, reversal learning, delayed non-matched to position, and delayed non-matched to sample to assess different aspects of memory. No difference was observed between tests of delayed non-matched to position (3.13 +/- 2.23 days) and delayed non-matched to sample (3.20 +/- 2.40 days) (P = 0.944). However, dogs had greater difficulty in reversal learning (8.47 +/- 2.61 days) than in object discrimination learning (4.60 +/- 1.64 days) (P <= 0.001). Based on the tests performed, the delayed non-matched to position test may be performed in clinical routine if the owner and the veterinarian have time available, because this test is sensitive to evaluate dogs with cognitive impairments, but requires approximately 10 days of training. Thus, elderly dogs are excellent experimental models to study pathological aging based on their similarities with some human brain diseases, such as Alzheimer disease. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.en
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, Sch Vet Med & Anim Sci, BR-18618970 Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUNESP, Dept Biostat, Inst Biosci, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, Sch Vet Med & Anim Sci, BR-18618970 Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUNESP, Dept Biostat, Inst Biosci, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
dc.format.extent6-12
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2013.09.002
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of Veterinary Behavior-clinical Applications And Research. New York: Elsevier Science Inc, v. 9, n. 1, p. 6-12, 2014.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jveb.2013.09.002
dc.identifier.issn1558-7878
dc.identifier.lattes0419131532719994
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/112587
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000329550600002
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Veterinary Behavior-clinical Applications And Research
dc.relation.ispartofjcr1.554
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,782
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectcognitionen
dc.subjectcanineen
dc.subjectcognitive dysfunction syndromeen
dc.subjectmemoryen
dc.subjectdiscrimination learningen
dc.titleClinical feasibility of cognitive testing in dogs (Canis lupus familiaris)en
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.licensehttp://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policy
dcterms.rightsHolderElsevier B.V.
unesp.author.lattes0419131532719994
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-3662-9607[3]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Instituto de Biociências, Botucatupt

Arquivos