Sem título

dc.contributor.authorStijn, Schauvliege
dc.contributor.authorCharlotte, Cuypers
dc.contributor.authorAnneleen, Michielsen
dc.contributor.authorFrank, Gasthuys
dc.contributor.authorMiguel, Gozalo-Marcilla [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionGhent University
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-01T20:51:16Z
dc.date.available2023-03-01T20:51:16Z
dc.date.issued2022-07-01
dc.description.abstractThe authors regret that an error was included in their published paper. In the legend of Table 3 on p.10 and in the last paragraph of the results on p. 11, the administration rate for detomidine was wrongly expressed per minute, this should have been per hour. • In the legend of Table 3, it is wrongly stated ‘for detomidine, changes by 2.5 μg kg-1 min-1 are proposed’ and ‘for detomidine, changes by 5 μg kg-1 min-1 are proposed’. These should respectively read ‘for detomidine, changes by 2.5 μg kg-1 hour-1 are proposed’ and ‘for detomidine, changes by 5 μg kg-1 hour-1 are proposed’. • In the last paragraph of the results, it is wrongly stated ‘for detomidine, changes in the rate by 2.5 μg kg-1 minute-1 are proposed, since the initial rate of detomidine infusion for standing surgical procedures of the authors is usually around 10 μg kg-1 minute-1’. This should read: ‘for detomidine, changes in the rate by 2.5 μg kg-1 hour-1 are proposed, since the initial rate of detomidine infusion for standing surgical procedures of the authors is usually around 10 μg kg-1 hour-1’. The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Surgery and Anaesthesia of Domestic Animals Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Ghent University
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Veterinary Surgery and Anaesthesiology Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science São Paulo State University (UNESP), SP
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Veterinary Surgery and Anaesthesiology Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science São Paulo State University (UNESP), SP
dc.format.extent431
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2022.03.005
dc.identifier.citationVeterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia, v. 49, n. 4, p. 431-, 2022.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.vaa.2022.03.005
dc.identifier.issn1467-2995
dc.identifier.issn1467-2987
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85132453920
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/241196
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofVeterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia
dc.sourceScopus
dc.title.alternativeCorrigendum to “How to score sedation and adjust the administration rate of sedatives in horses: a literature review and introduction of the Ghent Sedation Algorithm” [Vet Anaesth Analg 46 (2019) 4–132]’, (S1467298718302174), (10.1016/j.vaa.2018.08.005)en
dc.typeErrata

Arquivos