Comparative field test between two sugar cane (Saccharum spp.) harvesters under two different operational conditions in Brazil

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributor.authorRipoli, M. L C [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRipoli, T. C C
dc.contributor.authorGamero, Carlos Antonio [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDe, S. M.
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:21:42Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:21:42Z
dc.date.issued2005-12-01
dc.description.abstractThe sugar cane crop is one of the main products in Brazil and according to several authors can generate, besides the industrialized stalks, an amount of crop residues from the order of 15 to 30 % in weight of the aerial part of the plants, depending on the field conditions. The sugar cane area in Brazil is around 5.5×106 hectares, with an amount of 400.106 tons of stalks, with stalks yield of 72 tons.ha-1. This study took place in a sugar cane plot (Latitude 22°46'S, Longitude 47°23'W and 600m of altitude) with 3% of slope, located in São Paulo State. The sugar cane variety was SP 80-1816, in its forth cut, 11 months old and with a planted row spacing of 1.40 m. By other side, several sugar mills are bringing the crop residue to their patio to produce energy with the bagasse. One choice is to bring the crop residue at the same moment with the stalks, avoiding the next operation of baling it. The objective of this study was to analyze some operational parameters of two different sugar cane harvesters under the same field conditions, which was divided in four treatments: T1 = CAMECO CHT2500B operating normally; T2 = CAMECO CHT2500B operating without the cleaning system; T3 = CASE 7700 operating normally; T4 = CASE 7700 operating without the cleaning system. The results obtained were: Table presented CEB = Gross effective capacity; CEL = Net effective capacity. The conclusion is that under normal operation the CASE harvester worked better then CAMECO in the parameters CEL stalks and Manipulation efficiency. And without the cleaning system operating CASE also worked better in the parameters of CEB raw material, CEB stalks, CEL raw material and CEL stalks.en
dc.description.affiliationUNESP Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias, Botucatu, SP
dc.description.affiliationESALQ Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP
dc.description.affiliationUnespUNESP Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias, Botucatu, SP
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.18830
dc.identifier.citation2005 ASAE Annual International Meeting.
dc.identifier.doi10.13031/2013.18830
dc.identifier.lattes1957087099988521
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-70349122554
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/68559
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartof2005 ASAE Annual International Meeting
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCrop residue
dc.subjectHarvesting
dc.subjectMechanization
dc.subjectSugar cane
dc.subjectAerial parts
dc.subjectCleaning system
dc.subjectEffective capacity
dc.subjectField conditions
dc.subjectField test
dc.subjectNormal operations
dc.subjectOperational conditions
dc.subjectOperational parameters
dc.subjectRow spacing
dc.subjectSaccharum spp
dc.subjectSugar mills
dc.subjectAgricultural wastes
dc.subjectCrops
dc.subjectHarvesters
dc.subjectMachinery
dc.subjectSugar (sucrose)
dc.subjectSugar factories
dc.subjectSugars
dc.titleComparative field test between two sugar cane (Saccharum spp.) harvesters under two different operational conditions in Brazilen
dc.typeTrabalho apresentado em evento
dcterms.licensehttp://elibrary.asabe.org/about.asp
unesp.author.lattes1957087099988521
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas, Botucatupt
unesp.departmentEngenharia Rural - FCApt

Arquivos

Coleções

Botucatu - FCA - Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas