Conhecimentos de professores sobre perda auditiva e suas atitudes frente á inclusão
Carregando...
Data
2010-08-01
Autores
Delgado-Pinheiro, Eliane Maria Carrit [UNESP]
Omote, Sadao [UNESP]
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
CEFAC Saúde e Educação
Resumo
OBJETIVOS: verificar os conhecimentos dos professores sobre a perda auditiva, suas opiniões sobre a educação de alunos com esse tipo de privação sensorial e também conhecer suas atitudes frente à proposta da inclusão. MÉTODOS: participaram desta pesquisa quatro grupos de professores do ensino fundamental, com e sem experiência com aluno com perda auditiva. Os instrumentos utilizados na coleta de dados foram a Escala Lickert de Atitudes Sociais em Relação à Inclusão (ELASI) e um questionário. Comparações entre os resultados de diferentes grupos, por meio de provas estatísticas apropriadas, foram feitas, sempre que a natureza dos dados o recomendava. RESULTADOS: os professores de 1ª a 4ª séries, com e sem experiência com alunos com perda auditiva, apresentaram respostas semelhantes com referência às atitudes sociais acerca da inclusão, tanto na dimensão ideológica quanto na operacional. Professores de 5ª a 8ª séries, com e sem experiência com alunos com perda auditiva, apresentaram respostas semelhantes nos itens ideológicos, porém divergiram nos itens operacionais. em relação aos conhecimentos, os grupos de professores com experiência não apresentaram conhecimentos diferenciados sobre aspectos relativos à perda auditiva, quando comparados com os grupos de professores sem experiência, e todos os grupos enfatizaram os aspectos comunicativos. CONCLUSÃO: a análise revela que os dados provenientes de diferentes instrumentos se complementam e sugerem que os professores são ideologicamente favoráveis à inclusão, entretanto, não têm conhecimentos suficientes para operacionalizar tal proposta.
PURPOSE: to check teachers' knowledge about hearing loss, their opinion about the students with this kind of sensorial privation and to know about their attitudes towards the inclusion proposal. METHODS: four groups of teachers from primary and secondary school, with and without experience with hearing loss students, took part in this research. The instruments utilized on this data were Lickert Scale of Attitudes toward Inclusion (ELASI) and a questionnaire, comparisons between different groups, by means of proper statistical tools, whenever the data features recommended it. RESULTS: the primary school teachers, with and without experience on hearing loss students, showed similar responses related to social attitudes about inclusion, both in under the ideological and operational dimension. The secondary school teachers, with and without experience, showed similar responses on the ideological items, however, they disagreed on the operational items. Related to the knowledge about hearing loss aspects, when compared with the group without experience and all groups emphasized the communicative aspects. CONCLUSION: the analysis revealed that different data collection procedures produced complementary data and suggested that teachers were ideologically favorable to inclusion, but they had not enough knowledge to make it feasible.
PURPOSE: to check teachers' knowledge about hearing loss, their opinion about the students with this kind of sensorial privation and to know about their attitudes towards the inclusion proposal. METHODS: four groups of teachers from primary and secondary school, with and without experience with hearing loss students, took part in this research. The instruments utilized on this data were Lickert Scale of Attitudes toward Inclusion (ELASI) and a questionnaire, comparisons between different groups, by means of proper statistical tools, whenever the data features recommended it. RESULTS: the primary school teachers, with and without experience on hearing loss students, showed similar responses related to social attitudes about inclusion, both in under the ideological and operational dimension. The secondary school teachers, with and without experience, showed similar responses on the ideological items, however, they disagreed on the operational items. Related to the knowledge about hearing loss aspects, when compared with the group without experience and all groups emphasized the communicative aspects. CONCLUSION: the analysis revealed that different data collection procedures produced complementary data and suggested that teachers were ideologically favorable to inclusion, but they had not enough knowledge to make it feasible.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Educação, Reabilitação de Deficientes Auditivos, Surdez, Perda Auditiva, Education, Rehabilitation of Hearing Impaired, Deafness, Hearing Loss
Como citar
Revista CEFAC. CEFAC Saúde e Educação, v. 12, n. 4, p. 633-640, 2010.