Does the Soil Tillage Affect the Quality of the Peanut Picker?

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributor.authorLopes de Brito Filho, Armando [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMorlin Carneiro, Franciele
dc.contributor.authorCosta Souza, Jarlyson Brunno [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLuns Hatun de Almeida, Samira [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPatias Lena, Bruno
dc.contributor.authorPereira da Silva, Rouverson [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionFederal Technological University of Paraná (UTFPR)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-29T16:12:27Z
dc.date.available2023-07-29T16:12:27Z
dc.date.issued2023-04-01
dc.description.abstractMachine harvesting is an essential step of crop production, considering a dynamic operation, and is subject to losses due to several factors that affect its quality. The objective of this study was to evaluate the quality of mechanized peanut pickers in the three soil tillage operations using Statistical Quality Control (SQC) tools. We conducted the experiments in a peanut field located at 21°20′23″ S and 47°54′06″ W of Brazilian peanut farmers. We used Statistic Control Quality (SQC) experimental design to monitor peanut losses during machine harvesting. The treatments evaluated were three soil tillage operations: conventional (CT), rotary tillers (RT), and hoe (RH). The quality indicators were collected inside the picker’s bulk tank. Statistical analyses used were descriptive statistics and SQC tools (run charts, control charts, and the Ishikawa diagram). The process was considered stable for indicators: whole pods (CT, RT, and RH), broken pods (CT, RT, and RH), and hatched pods (CT, RT, and RH), while the other indicators showed points that were out of control. With the application of SQC tools, it was possible to identify the factors that caused the increase of variability in peanut harvesting, listing the points to be improved to support decision-making, always aiming to increase this operation’s quality.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Engineering and Mathematical Sciences School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences São Paulo State University (Unesp), São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationFederal Technological University of Paraná (UTFPR), Paraná
dc.description.affiliationUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Engineering and Mathematical Sciences School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences São Paulo State University (Unesp), São Paulo
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13041024
dc.identifier.citationAgronomy, v. 13, n. 4, 2023.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/agronomy13041024
dc.identifier.issn2073-4395
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85153883784
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/249904
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAgronomy
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectArachis hypogaeaL
dc.subjectharvesting mechanization
dc.subjectimpurity
dc.subjectqualitative losses
dc.subjectstatistical process control
dc.titleDoes the Soil Tillage Affect the Quality of the Peanut Picker?en
dc.typeArtigo
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-8053-0399[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-8852-2548[6]

Arquivos

Coleções

Artigos - Engenharia Rural - FCAV