Logotipo do repositório

Comparative evaluation of three laparoscopic cholecystectomy techniques in rabbit’s model

dc.contributor.authorWittmaack, Monica Carolina Nery [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorConceição, Maria Eduarda Bastos Andrade Moutinho [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorVera, María Camila Maldonado [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorFaccini, Rachel Inamassu [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSembenelli, Guilherme [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMontanhim, Gabriel Luiz [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorde Menezes, Mareliza Possa [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRocha, Fabiana Del Lama [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAires, Luiz Paulo Nogueira [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMoraes, Paola Castro [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T20:13:39Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this randomized study was to compare the complications and perioperative outcome of three different techniques of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Changes in the liver function test after LC techniques were investigated. Also, we compared the degree of postoperative adhesions and histopathological changes of the liver bed. Methods: Thirty rabbits were divided into three groups: group A) Fundus-first technique by Hook dissecting instrument and Roeder Slipknot applied for cystic duct (CD) ligation; group B) conventional technique by Maryland dissecting forceps and electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing (EBVS) for CD seal; group C) conventional technique by EBVS for gallbladder (GB) dissection and CD seal. Results: Group A presented a longer GB dissection time than groups B and C. GB perforation and bleeding from tissues adjacent to GB were similar among tested groups. Gamma-glutamyl transferase and alkaline phosphatase levels increased (p ≤ 0.05) on day 3 postoperatively in group A. By the 15th postoperative day, the enzymes returned to the preoperative values. Transient elevation of hepatic transaminases occurred after LC in all groups. Group A had a higher adherence score than groups B and C and was associated with the least predictable technique. Conclusion: LC can be performed using different techniques, although the use of EBVS is highly recommended.en
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” – School of Agrarian Sciences and Veterinary – Department of Veterinary Surgery, São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” – School of Agrarian Sciences and Veterinary – Department of Veterinary Surgery, São Paulo
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCNPq: 140209/2018-2
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2017/23402-8
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/acb383523
dc.identifier.citationActa Cirurgica Brasileira, v. 38.
dc.identifier.dimensionspub.1166577178
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/acb383523
dc.identifier.issn1678-2674
dc.identifier.issn0102-8650
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0979-0825
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3912-6423
dc.identifier.orcid0009-0009-9306-2123
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0255-2971
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3229-9396
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7191-2320
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9830-041X
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC10691173
dc.identifier.pmid38055391
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85178471344
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/308807
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherFapUNIFESP (SciELO)
dc.relation.ispartofActa Cirurgica Brasileira
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso abertopt
dc.rights.sourceRightsoa_all
dc.rights.sourceRightsgold
dc.sourceScopus
dc.sourceDimensions
dc.subjectBiliary Tract Surgical Procedures
dc.subjectCholecystectomy, Laparoscopic
dc.subjectCystic Duct
dc.subjectGallbladder Diseases
dc.titleComparative evaluation of three laparoscopic cholecystectomy techniques in rabbit’s modelen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication

Arquivos

Coleções