Logo do repositório

Synergistic Effect of Implant Surface Physicochemical Modifications and Macrogeometry on the Early Stages of Osseointegration: An In Vivo Preclinical Study

dc.contributor.authorBenalcázar-Jalkh, Ernesto B.
dc.contributor.authorNayak, Vasudev Vivekanand
dc.contributor.authorSlavin, Blaire V.
dc.contributor.authorBalderrama, Isis Fatima [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBonfante, Estevam A.
dc.contributor.authorCoelho, Paulo G.
dc.contributor.authorWitek, Lukasz
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Miami Miller School of Medicine
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Miami
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionNYU Grossman School of Medicine
dc.contributor.institutionNYU Tandon School of Engineering
dc.contributor.institutionNYU College of Dentistry
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T18:50:36Z
dc.date.issued2025-04-01
dc.description.abstractThis preclinical, in vivo study aimed to histologically and histomorphometrically evaluate the effect of implant design features on bone healing during the early stages of osseointegration. Three different implant macrogeometries and surface treatments were evaluated: (1) trapezoidal threads with decompressing vertical chambers and blasted acid-etched surface (Maestro/Blasted+AE); (2) large thread pitch implant with deep and wide threads, with TiUnite surface (RS/TiUnite); and (3) progressive buttress threads with SLActive surface (BL/SLActive). Implant surfaces were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, profilometry, and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Implants were placed in the iliac bone of 12 female sheep (~65 kg and 2 years old). Following healing times of 3- and 6- weeks, samples were harvested and subjected to qualitative and quantitative histological/histomorphometric evaluations. Percentages of bone-to-implant contact (%BIC) along the implant's perimeter and bone area fraction occupancy (%BAFO) within implant threads were measured, and results were analyzed using a linear mixed model analysis. All implants, irrespective of differences in macrogeometry and surface treatment, at both healing times demonstrated successful osseointegration. Evaluations of %BIC yielded no statistically significant differences among groups at 3 and 6 weeks (p > 0.052). While no significant differences were detected among groups for %BAFO at 3 weeks (p > 0.249), Maestro/Blasted+AE yielded significantly higher degrees of bone formation within implant threads relative to RS/TiUnite (p = 0.043) and BL/SLActive group (p = 0.032) at the 6-week time point. Qualitative histological analyses depicted different osseointegration features for the different implants. While Maestro/Blasted+AE portrayed evidence of an intramembranous-like osseointegration pathway in the healing chambers and interfacial remodeling at thread tips, BL/SLActive and RS/TiUnite groups predominantly presented an interfacial bone remodeling healing pathway. Implant design features influenced the osseointegration pathway, where implants with decompressing vertical chambers enhanced bone formation between implant threads.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Prosthodontics and Periodontology Bauru School of Dentistry University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology University of Miami Miller School of Medicine
dc.description.affiliationDr. John T. Macdonald Foundation Biomedical Nanotechnology Institute (BioNIUM) University of Miami
dc.description.affiliationUniversity of Miami Miller School of Medicine
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery School of Dentistry of Araraquara Sao Paulo State University, Sao Paulo
dc.description.affiliationDeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery Division of Plastic Surgery University of Miami Miller School of Medicine
dc.description.affiliationHansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery NYU Grossman School of Medicine
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Biomedical Engineering NYU Tandon School of Engineering
dc.description.affiliationBiomaterials and Regenerative Biology Division NYU College of Dentistry
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery School of Dentistry of Araraquara Sao Paulo State University, Sao Paulo
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.35569
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials, v. 113, n. 4, 2025.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jbm.b.35569
dc.identifier.issn1552-4981
dc.identifier.issn1552-4973
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105002023803
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/300785
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectdental implants
dc.subjectdesign
dc.subjectosseointegration
dc.subjectsurface treatment
dc.titleSynergistic Effect of Implant Surface Physicochemical Modifications and Macrogeometry on the Early Stages of Osseointegration: An In Vivo Preclinical Studyen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationca4c0298-cd82-48ee-a9c8-c97704bac2b0
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryca4c0298-cd82-48ee-a9c8-c97704bac2b0
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-7184-8485[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-1458-6527[7]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquarapt

Arquivos