Logo do repositório

Does Size Matter? A Retrospective Study Analysing the Size of PI-RADS 4 Lesions and Its Associated Prostate Cancer Positivity with Transperineal Prostate Biopsy

dc.contributor.authorHooshyari, Ali
dc.contributor.authorScholtz, David
dc.contributor.authorMaoate, Keu
dc.contributor.authorRobertson, Samuel
dc.contributor.authorVermeulen, Lodewikus Petrus
dc.contributor.authorDe Andrade, Luiz Gustavo Modelli [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorKawano, Paulo Roberto [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGilling, Peter
dc.contributor.authorFraundorfer, Mark
dc.contributor.authorOrdones, Flavio Vasconcelos [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionTauranga Hospital
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Auckland
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T18:06:50Z
dc.date.issued2025-01-01
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an essential tool in Prostate Cancer (PCa) diagnosis. PI-RADS v2.1 score correlates with clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPCa) and according to the most recent guidelines, prevalence of CSPCa with PI-RADS 4 is 33–41%, while PI-RADS 5 is 62–79%. These groups are separated only by a size of 15 mm yet the difference in risk is significant. This study aims to find a size threshold associated with CSPCa within the PI-RADS 4 group, which may be used in combination with other prostatic parameters, such as PSA density in order to help with risk stratification and patient counselling in the pre-biopsy setting. This may also aid with surveillance of smaller PI-RADS 4 lesions in the setting of a negative biopsy and avoid unnecessary repeat biopsies unless triggered by a size threshold. Methods: A retrospective study was performed with data from 407 patients undergoing transperineal prostate biopsy (TPPB) between April 2022 and November 2023. A subgroup of patients with PI-RADS 4 was included for analysis. A ROC-AUC was obtained. Results: Median age was 67 (interquartile range: 61–71) and PSA density 0.20 (interquartile range 0.13–0.28). PI-RADS score correlated with CSPCa: for PI-RADS 1 and 2, the frequency of CSPCa was 10%; for PI-RADS 3, it was 20%; for PI-RADS 4, it was 60%; and for PI-RADS 5, it was 80%, Pearson correlation = 0.51, p < 0.001. The Receiver Operating Characteristic Area Under the Curve (ROC-AUC) was determined to be 0.664 [0.579–0.7499]. The optimal cut-off point was 8.5 mm. Patients with lesions larger than 8.5 mm had 2.31 times higher risk CSPCa. Conclusion: PI-RADS 4 size does matter and is a useful predictor of CSPCa. In our study, a cut-off of 8.5 mm was identified. The combination of PI-RADS 4 with PSA density provides a specificity higher than 80% for CSPCa detection.en
dc.description.affiliationUrology Department Tauranga Hospital
dc.description.affiliationSurgical Department University of Auckland
dc.description.affiliationRenal Department Botucatu School of Medicine São Paulo State University
dc.description.affiliationUrology Department Botucatu School of Medicine São Paulo State University
dc.description.affiliationUnespRenal Department Botucatu School of Medicine São Paulo State University
dc.description.affiliationUnespUrology Department Botucatu School of Medicine São Paulo State University
dc.format.extent49-57
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S499930
dc.identifier.citationResearch and Reports in Urology, v. 17, p. 49-57.
dc.identifier.doi10.2147/RRU.S499930
dc.identifier.issn2253-2447
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85219646737
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/297513
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofResearch and Reports in Urology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectmpMRI
dc.subjectPI-RADS 4
dc.subjectprostate cancer
dc.subjectsize
dc.subjecttransperineal prostate biopsy
dc.titleDoes Size Matter? A Retrospective Study Analysing the Size of PI-RADS 4 Lesions and Its Associated Prostate Cancer Positivity with Transperineal Prostate Biopsyen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationa3cdb24b-db92-40d9-b3af-2eacecf9f2ba
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoverya3cdb24b-db92-40d9-b3af-2eacecf9f2ba
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-9378-7265[1]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina, Botucatupt

Arquivos