Does Size Matter? A Retrospective Study Analysing the Size of PI-RADS 4 Lesions and Its Associated Prostate Cancer Positivity with Transperineal Prostate Biopsy
| dc.contributor.author | Hooshyari, Ali | |
| dc.contributor.author | Scholtz, David | |
| dc.contributor.author | Maoate, Keu | |
| dc.contributor.author | Robertson, Samuel | |
| dc.contributor.author | Vermeulen, Lodewikus Petrus | |
| dc.contributor.author | De Andrade, Luiz Gustavo Modelli [UNESP] | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kawano, Paulo Roberto [UNESP] | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gilling, Peter | |
| dc.contributor.author | Fraundorfer, Mark | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ordones, Flavio Vasconcelos [UNESP] | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Tauranga Hospital | |
| dc.contributor.institution | University of Auckland | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-04-29T18:06:50Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-01-01 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Introduction: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an essential tool in Prostate Cancer (PCa) diagnosis. PI-RADS v2.1 score correlates with clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPCa) and according to the most recent guidelines, prevalence of CSPCa with PI-RADS 4 is 33–41%, while PI-RADS 5 is 62–79%. These groups are separated only by a size of 15 mm yet the difference in risk is significant. This study aims to find a size threshold associated with CSPCa within the PI-RADS 4 group, which may be used in combination with other prostatic parameters, such as PSA density in order to help with risk stratification and patient counselling in the pre-biopsy setting. This may also aid with surveillance of smaller PI-RADS 4 lesions in the setting of a negative biopsy and avoid unnecessary repeat biopsies unless triggered by a size threshold. Methods: A retrospective study was performed with data from 407 patients undergoing transperineal prostate biopsy (TPPB) between April 2022 and November 2023. A subgroup of patients with PI-RADS 4 was included for analysis. A ROC-AUC was obtained. Results: Median age was 67 (interquartile range: 61–71) and PSA density 0.20 (interquartile range 0.13–0.28). PI-RADS score correlated with CSPCa: for PI-RADS 1 and 2, the frequency of CSPCa was 10%; for PI-RADS 3, it was 20%; for PI-RADS 4, it was 60%; and for PI-RADS 5, it was 80%, Pearson correlation = 0.51, p < 0.001. The Receiver Operating Characteristic Area Under the Curve (ROC-AUC) was determined to be 0.664 [0.579–0.7499]. The optimal cut-off point was 8.5 mm. Patients with lesions larger than 8.5 mm had 2.31 times higher risk CSPCa. Conclusion: PI-RADS 4 size does matter and is a useful predictor of CSPCa. In our study, a cut-off of 8.5 mm was identified. The combination of PI-RADS 4 with PSA density provides a specificity higher than 80% for CSPCa detection. | en |
| dc.description.affiliation | Urology Department Tauranga Hospital | |
| dc.description.affiliation | Surgical Department University of Auckland | |
| dc.description.affiliation | Renal Department Botucatu School of Medicine São Paulo State University | |
| dc.description.affiliation | Urology Department Botucatu School of Medicine São Paulo State University | |
| dc.description.affiliationUnesp | Renal Department Botucatu School of Medicine São Paulo State University | |
| dc.description.affiliationUnesp | Urology Department Botucatu School of Medicine São Paulo State University | |
| dc.format.extent | 49-57 | |
| dc.identifier | http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S499930 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Research and Reports in Urology, v. 17, p. 49-57. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.2147/RRU.S499930 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2253-2447 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85219646737 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11449/297513 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Research and Reports in Urology | |
| dc.source | Scopus | |
| dc.subject | mpMRI | |
| dc.subject | PI-RADS 4 | |
| dc.subject | prostate cancer | |
| dc.subject | size | |
| dc.subject | transperineal prostate biopsy | |
| dc.title | Does Size Matter? A Retrospective Study Analysing the Size of PI-RADS 4 Lesions and Its Associated Prostate Cancer Positivity with Transperineal Prostate Biopsy | en |
| dc.type | Artigo | pt |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | a3cdb24b-db92-40d9-b3af-2eacecf9f2ba | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | a3cdb24b-db92-40d9-b3af-2eacecf9f2ba | |
| unesp.author.orcid | 0000-0002-9378-7265[1] | |
| unesp.campus | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina, Botucatu | pt |

