Atenção!


O atendimento às questões referentes ao Repositório Institucional será interrompido entre os dias 20 de dezembro de 2025 a 4 de janeiro de 2026.

Pedimos a sua compreensão e aproveitamos para desejar boas festas!

Logo do repositório

Influence of different adhesion strategies on glass fiber post retention

dc.contributor.authorNadler, Ana-Michelle-Oliveira
dc.contributor.authorda Silva, Evair-Josino
dc.contributor.authorLins-Filho, Paulo-Cardoso
dc.contributor.authorDias, Marlon-Ferreira [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGuimarães, Renata-Pedrosa
dc.contributor.authorda Silva, Claudio-Heliomar-Vicente
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Sérgio-dos Santos
dc.contributor.authorGomes, Anderson-Stevens-Leonidas
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T20:15:14Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-01
dc.description.abstractBackground: Failures in glass fiber post (GFP) retention may be associated with low adhesion achieved in root dentin. Material and Methods: 55 single-rooted premolars were endodontically treated and distributed according to different adhesion strategies (n=11): G1: RelyX ARC (3M ESPE; etch-rinse strategy); G2: Relyx Ultimate (3M ESPE; etch-rinse strategy); G3: AllCem (FGM; etch-rinse strategy); G4: Relyx Ultimate (3M ESPE; self-etching strategy); G5: RelyX U200 (3M ESPE; self-adhesive strategy). For Bonding Strength (BS) analysis, the roots were sectioned in slices (1.0mm thickness) corresponding to each root third and submitted to push-out test. The type of failure was assessed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results: The highest BS averages were found in G2 and G3. However, in the middle and apical root thirds, G3 showed statistically similar results to G4 and G5. In the cervical and middle third, G1 was statistically similar to G4 and G5. The mixed type of failure was the most common in all groups. Conclusions: self-etching (G4) and self-adhesive resin (G5) cements, showed similar BS results of immediate bonding in the cementation of GFP compared to conventional resin cements (G1, G2, G3).en
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual de São Paulo – UNESP
dc.description.affiliationLaboratory technicians of the Department of Physics Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco, Pernambuco
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual de São Paulo – UNESP
dc.format.extent649-657
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.60452
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, v. 15, n. 8, p. 649-657, 2023.
dc.identifier.doi10.4317/jced.60452
dc.identifier.issn1989-5488
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85169054985
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/309365
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectDental Bonding
dc.subjectDental Cements
dc.subjectDentin-Bonding Agents
dc.subjectPost and Core Technique
dc.titleInfluence of different adhesion strategies on glass fiber post retentionen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication

Arquivos

Coleções