Logo do repositório
 

Results of screening for cervical cancer among pregnant and non-pregnant women in Brazil

dc.contributor.authorXavier-Junior, Jose C. C. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorVale, Diama B.
dc.contributor.authorVieira, Luiz F. F. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLima, Marcelo T.
dc.contributor.authorZeferino, Luiz C.
dc.contributor.authorDufloth, Rozany M. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-21T13:09:26Z
dc.date.available2015-10-21T13:09:26Z
dc.date.issued2015-07-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare cervical cytology test results among pregnant and non-pregnant women, and to assess associations with age, screening history, and onset of sexual intercourse. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of cervical smears obtained from women aged 18-34 years in the Campinas region of Brazil between January 2000 and December 2009. Eligible participants had not undergone cytological screening within the previous year and had no history of precursor lesions or cervical cancer. Multinomial logistic regression was performed for different age groups, with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) as the endpoint. Results: Overall, 3072 (0.4%) of 861 353 non-pregnant women and 135 (0.4%) of 37 568 pregnant women had HSILs. Odds of HSIL among pregnant and non-pregnant women did not differ in any age group. An increased age at first sexual intercourse among pregnant women reduced odds of HSILs in all age groups (odds ratio 0.9 [95% confidence interval 0.8-0.9] for all). Among women aged 21-24 years, 25-29 years, and 30-34 years, some associations were identified between an interval of less than 5 years since previous screening and reduced odds of HSILs. Conclusion: Mandatory cervical cytology screening does not seem to be necessary for pregnant women; protocols in place for non-pregnant women should be followed. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.en
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, Botucatu Med Sch, Dept Pathol, BR-18618970 Botucatu, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Campinas, Dept Gynecol &Obstet, Campinas, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, Botucatu Med Sch, Dept Pathol, BR-18618970 Botucatu, SP, Brazil
dc.format.extent36-39
dc.identifierhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020729215001617
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal Of Gynecology &obstetrics, v. 130, n. 1, p. 36-39, 2015.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.01.016
dc.identifier.issn0020-7292
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/128384
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000356979500009
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal Of Gynecology &obstetrics
dc.relation.ispartofjcr2.072
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,877
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectAgeen
dc.subjectCervical cancer screeningen
dc.subjectCervical intraepithelial neoplasiaen
dc.subjectCervical smearen
dc.subjectFirst sexual intercourseen
dc.subjectPregnancyen
dc.titleResults of screening for cervical cancer among pregnant and non-pregnant women in Brazilen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.licensehttp://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policy
dcterms.rightsHolderElsevier B.V.
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-0503-419X[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-2423-0225[2]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina, Botucatupt
unesp.departmentPatologia - FMBpt

Arquivos