Logo do repositório

Fractured orbital wall reconstruction with an auricular cartilage graft or absorbable polyacid copolymer

dc.contributor.authorKruschewsky, Leonardo De Souza
dc.contributor.authorNovais, Tatiana
dc.contributor.authorDaltro, Carla
dc.contributor.authorCastelo Branco, Bruno
dc.contributor.authorLessa, Marcus
dc.contributor.authorKruschewsky, Marinella Benez
dc.contributor.authorDe Mello-Filho, Francisco Verissimo
dc.contributor.institutionApto. 503
dc.contributor.institutionHospital da Bahia
dc.contributor.institutionFaculdade de Tecnologia e Ciencias
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Bahia
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-28T18:56:56Z
dc.date.available2022-04-28T18:56:56Z
dc.date.issued2011-07-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: The objective of the study was to compare the functional and aesthetic results of fractured orbital wall reconstruction with an auricular cartilage graft or absorbable polyacid copolymer. Materials and Methods: Twenty patients with blow-out orbital fracture/orbital floor associated or not with the medial wall were assessed by the same craniofacial surgical group. All were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively by an ophthalmologist for diplopia, enophthalmos, exophthalmos, sensitivity, ophthalmic reflexes, intraocular pressure, and visual field.The patients were subjected to a preoperative facial multislice computed tomographic scan, repeated 6 months after surgery. Eight patients underwent reconstruction with an auricular cartilage graft, and 12 patients, with blade absorbable polyacid copolymer. Subtarsal access was used for all patients. Results: Two patients showed temporary ectropion, 1 in each group. All patients presented satisfactory ocular function, and all tests revealed good orbital delineation, orbital symmetry, periorbital sinus individualization, and reduction of blow-out. Conclusions: The blow-out orbital wall reconstruction can be performed with the use of an auricular cartilage or with a blade absorbable copolymer without differences regarding functional or aesthetic complications and sequelae. © 2011 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.en
dc.description.affiliationClinica AMO Institution Apto. 503, Avenida Paulo VI 2200, Pituba 41810001, Salvador Bahia
dc.description.affiliationHospital da Bahia
dc.description.affiliationFaculdade de Tecnologia e Ciencias
dc.description.affiliationMedical Faculty University of Bahia
dc.description.affiliationUniversity of Sao Paulo
dc.format.extent1256-1259
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31821c6a77
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Craniofacial Surgery, v. 22, n. 4, p. 1256-1259, 2011.
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SCS.0b013e31821c6a77
dc.identifier.issn1049-2275
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-80051544547
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/219693
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Craniofacial Surgery
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectabsorbable copolymer
dc.subjectcartilage graft
dc.subjectOrbital fracture
dc.subjectorbital reconstruction
dc.subjectorbital trauma
dc.titleFractured orbital wall reconstruction with an auricular cartilage graft or absorbable polyacid copolymeren
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication

Arquivos

Coleções