Publicação:
Trimming and washing poultry carcass to reduce microbial contamination: A comparative study

dc.contributor.authorStefani, Lenita Moura
dc.contributor.authorBackes, Rodrigo Guilherme
dc.contributor.authorFaria, Glaucia Amorim [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBiffi, Claudia Pies
dc.contributor.authorAlmeida, Juliana Maria de
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Helen Krystine da
dc.contributor.authorNeves, Gabriella Bassi das
dc.contributor.authorLangaro, Anaiara
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Estado Santa Catarina
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-18T15:56:20Z
dc.date.available2015-03-18T15:56:20Z
dc.date.issued2014-12-01
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this study was to compare the efficiency of washing and trimming broiler carcasses to reduce bacterial contamination. At the poste-visceration site, 100 broiler carcasses were collected during 4 visits to a slaughterhouse in Santa Catarina State, Brazil. Birds were from the same flock, age, and approximately 2.4 kg of weight. Groups were as follows: group 1, with fecal contamination; group 2, without fecal contamination; group 3, with fecal contamination and trimmed; group 4, with fecal contamination and washed; group 5, with fecal contamination, and washed and trimmed. Carcass washings were performed with at least 1.5 L/bird of potable water (0.5 to 1 mg/kg of residual chlorine) at room temperature (20-25 degrees C) using spray cabinets with 44 spray nozzles distributed into 2 chambers (pressure of 2 kgf/cm(2) and 4 kgf/cm(2)). Washed carcasses (trimmed or not) showed significantly (P < 0.05) lower counts of aerobic mesophiles (plate count agar) on the third evaluation, and even lower (P < 0.01) counts for total coliforms (CT) and fecal coliforms (Escherichia coli). Trimmed carcasses showed significantly lower counts (P < 0.05) for plate count agar; however, we observed higher counts for E. coli (P < 0.05). The association of both treatments (washing and trimming) showed significantly higher (P < 0.05) counts for coliforms (CT and E. coli). We can conclude that the washing method is overall more efficient than the trimming method to decontaminate chicken carcasses at the postevisceration site. Hopefully, our findings can help poultry companies to minimize production costs by applying the washing method for carcass decontamination.en
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estado Santa Catarina, Ctr Educ Super Oeste, BR-89815630 Chapeco, SC, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista Julio Mesquita Filho UNESP, Fac Engn, BR-15385000 Ilha Solteira City, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista Julio Mesquita Filho UNESP, Fac Engn, BR-15385000 Ilha Solteira City, SP, Brazil
dc.format.extent3119-3122
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03383
dc.identifier.citationPoultry Science. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press, v. 93, n. 12, p. 3119-3122, 2014.
dc.identifier.doi10.3382/ps.2013-03383
dc.identifier.issn0032-5791
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/117507
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000345574800022
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherOxford Univ Press
dc.relation.ispartofPoultry Science
dc.relation.ispartofjcr2.216
dc.relation.ispartofsjr1,112
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectchicken meaten
dc.subjectdecontaminationen
dc.subjectmicrobial contaminationen
dc.subjecttrimmingen
dc.subjectwashingen
dc.titleTrimming and washing poultry carcass to reduce microbial contamination: A comparative studyen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.licensehttp://www.oxfordjournals.org/access_purchase/self-archiving_policyb.html
dcterms.rightsHolderOxford Univ Press
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Engenharia, Ilha Solteirapt
unesp.departmentMatemática - FEISpt

Arquivos