Logo do repositório

Can Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Images Be Used to Estimate Forage Production Parameters in Agroforestry Systems in the Caatinga?

dc.contributor.authorSantos, Wagner Martins dos
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Claudenilde de Jesus Pinheiro
dc.contributor.authorMedeiros, Maria Luana da Silva
dc.contributor.authorJardim, Alexandre Maniçoba da Rosa Ferraz [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCunha, Márcio Vieira da
dc.contributor.authorDubeux Junior, José Carlos Batista
dc.contributor.authorJaramillo, David Mirabedini
dc.contributor.authorBezerra, Alan Cezar
dc.contributor.authorSouza, Evaristo Jorge Oliveira de
dc.contributor.institutionFederal Rural University of Pernambuco
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Florida
dc.contributor.institutionUSDA-ARS
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T20:08:34Z
dc.date.issued2024-06-01
dc.description.abstractThe environmental changes in the Caatinga biome have already resulted in it reaching levels of approximately 50% of its original vegetation, making it the third most degraded biome in Brazil, due to inadequate grazing practices that are driven by the difficulty of monitoring and estimating the yield parameters of forage plants, especially in agroforestry systems (AFS) in this biome. This study aimed to compare the predictive ability of different indexes with regard to the biomass and leaf area index of forage crops (bushveld signal grass and buffel grass) in AFS in the Caatinga biome and to evaluate the influence of removing system components on model performance. The normalized green red difference index (NGRDI) and the visible atmospherically resistant index (VARI) showed higher correlations (p < 0.05) with the variables. In addition, removing trees from the orthomosaics was the approach that most favored the correlation values. The models based on classification and regression trees (CARTs) showed lower RMSE values, presenting values of 3020.86, 1201.75, and 0.20 for FB, DB, and LAI, respectively, as well as higher CCC values (0.94). Using NGRDI and VARI, removing trees from the images, and using CART are recommended in estimating biomass and leaf area index in agroforestry systems in the Caatinga biome.en
dc.description.affiliationPostgraduate Program in Plant Production Academic Unit of Serra Talhada Federal Rural University of Pernambuco
dc.description.affiliationPostgraduate Program in Animal Science Federal Rural University of Pernambuco
dc.description.affiliationAcademic Unit of Serra Talhada Federal Rural University of Pernambuco
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Biodiversity Institute of Biosciences São Paulo State University—UNESP
dc.description.affiliationNorth Florida Research and Education Center University of Florida
dc.description.affiliationU.S. Dairy Forage Research Center USDA-ARS
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Biodiversity Institute of Biosciences São Paulo State University—UNESP
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app14114896
dc.identifier.citationApplied Sciences (Switzerland), v. 14, n. 11, 2024.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/app14114896
dc.identifier.issn2076-3417
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85195962643
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/307147
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Sciences (Switzerland)
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectbuffel grass
dc.subjectbushveld signal grass
dc.subjectmachine learning
dc.subjectremote sensing
dc.subjectsemiarid
dc.subjectyield
dc.titleCan Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Images Be Used to Estimate Forage Production Parameters in Agroforestry Systems in the Caatinga?en
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-3584-1323[1]
unesp.author.orcid0009-0009-5014-4567[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-7094-3635[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-8269-9959[6]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-5687-8010[7]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-9986-9464[8]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-2206-414X[9]

Arquivos

Coleções