Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPiccioni, Máyra Andressa Rodrigues Valinhos [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBaratto-Filho, Flares
dc.contributor.authorKuga, Milton Carlos [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMorais, Eduardo Christiano Caregnatto de
dc.contributor.authorCampos, Edson Alves [UNESP]
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-06T16:13:24Z
dc.date.available2015-08-06T16:13:24Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifierhttp://www.jaypeejournals.com/eJournals/Abstract.aspx?id=5964&AID=24&num=6
dc.identifier.citationThe Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, v. 15, n. 1, p. 26-28, 2014.
dc.identifier.issn1526-3711
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/125894
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study to investigate the effects of different polymerization protocols on the cuspal movement in class II composite restorations. Materials and methods: Human premolar teeth were prepared with class II cavities and then restored with composite and three-step and two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive systems under different curing techniques (n = 10). It was used a lightemittingdiode curing unit and the mode of polymerization were: standard (exposure for 40 seconds at 700 mW/cm2), pulse-delay (initial exposure for 6 seconds at 350 mW/cm2 followed by a resting period of 3 minutes and a final exposure of 37 seconds at 700 mW/cm2) and soft-start curing (exposure 10 seconds at 350 mW/cm2 and 35 seconds at 700 mW/cm2). The cuspal distance (µm) was measured before and after the restorative procedure and the difference was recorded as cuspal movement. The data were submitted to two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni test (p < 0.05). Results: The type of adhesive system did not influenced the cuspal movement for all the curing methods. Standard protocol showed the highest values of cuspal movement and was statistically different from the pulse-delay and soft-start curing modes. Conclusion: Although the cuspal displacement was not completely avoided, alternative methods of photocuring should be considered to minimize the clinical consequences of composites contraction stress.en
dc.format.extent26-28
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofThe Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
dc.sourceCurrículo Lattes
dc.subjectEtch-and-rinse adhesiveen
dc.subjectBonding techniqueen
dc.subjectPolymerizationen
dc.subjectCuspal movementen
dc.titleCuspal movement related to different polymerization protocolsen
dc.typeArtigo
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Positivo de Curitiba
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Positivo de Curitiba, Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora, Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara
dc.identifier.doi10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1482
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquarapt
dc.identifier.lattes1627568419811788
unesp.departmentOdontologia Restauradorapt
unesp.author.lattes1627568419811788
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,263
Localize o texto completo

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record