Remoção de irregularidades superficiais do esmalte dental após a remoção de braquetes ortodônticos: efeito de polimentos superficiais e tempos de análise
Carregando...
Arquivos
Data
2017-08-29
Autores
Franco, Laura Molinar [UNESP]
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Resumo
O objetivo deste ensaio clínico foi avaliar o comportamento de dois sistemas de polimento na regularização da superfície do esmalte dental, que apresentava-se rugosa e irregular após a remoção de braquetes ortodônticos. As variáveis de resposta foram: rugosidade superficial, luminosidade, morfologia, textura e sensibilidade. Fizeram parte dessa pesquisa clínica 30 voluntários. Os fatores em estudo foram: as técnicas de poli- mento superficial em dois níveis: Técnica 1 (discos de óxido de alumínio) e Técnica 2 (produto ácido-abrasivo), e o tempo de análise em 5 níveis: T0 (baseline), T1 (imedia- tamente após os polimentos superficiais), T2 (após polimento final), T3 (7 dias após os procedimentos) e T4 (6 meses após os procedimentos). Os dados representados por escores foram analisados considerando distribuição multinomial; os dados numéricos foram analisados como medidas repetidas no tempo, a um nível de significância de 5%. Nas análises de rugosidade superficial e luminosidade, não houve diferença estatística entre as técnicas em todos os tempos analisados. Nas análises por score, dentro de cada tempo, verificou-se igualdade significativa apenas no baseline; nos demais tempos foram observadas irregularidades superficiais estatisticamente superiores para a Técnica 1. Nenhum paciente apresentou sensibilidade dental. Ambas as técnicas foram eficientes; porém a maior lisura foi adquirida quando a Técnica 2 foi utilizada.
This clinical study evaluated the behavior of two surface polishing systems in the regularization of the enamel surface, which was rough and irregular after orthodontic brackets debonding. The response variables were: surface roughness, lightness, morphology, texture and sensitivity. Thirty volunteers were part of this clinical research. The factors under study were: Surface polishing at two levels: Technique 1 (aluminum oxide disks) and Technique 2 (enamel microabrasive product); and the Time of analysis at 5 levels: T0 (after surface polishing), T1 (immediately after surface polishing), T2 (after final polishing), T3 (7 days after surface polishing) and T4 (6 months after surface polishing). The data represented by scores were analyzed considering multinomial distribution; the numerical ones were analyzed as measures repeated in time, at a significance level of 5%. In the analysis of surface roughness and lightness, there was no statistical difference between the polishing techniques at all times analyzed. In the other analyzes, within each time, significant equality was observed only in the baseline, while in the other times superficial irregularities were statistically superior for Technique 1. No patient presented dental sensitivity. Both techniques were efficient; however, the higher surface smoothness was observed on the dental enamel surface polished with the Technique 2.
This clinical study evaluated the behavior of two surface polishing systems in the regularization of the enamel surface, which was rough and irregular after orthodontic brackets debonding. The response variables were: surface roughness, lightness, morphology, texture and sensitivity. Thirty volunteers were part of this clinical research. The factors under study were: Surface polishing at two levels: Technique 1 (aluminum oxide disks) and Technique 2 (enamel microabrasive product); and the Time of analysis at 5 levels: T0 (after surface polishing), T1 (immediately after surface polishing), T2 (after final polishing), T3 (7 days after surface polishing) and T4 (6 months after surface polishing). The data represented by scores were analyzed considering multinomial distribution; the numerical ones were analyzed as measures repeated in time, at a significance level of 5%. In the analysis of surface roughness and lightness, there was no statistical difference between the polishing techniques at all times analyzed. In the other analyzes, within each time, significant equality was observed only in the baseline, while in the other times superficial irregularities were statistically superior for Technique 1. No patient presented dental sensitivity. Both techniques were efficient; however, the higher surface smoothness was observed on the dental enamel surface polished with the Technique 2.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Microabrasão do esmalte, Ortodontia, Esmalte dental, Profilaxia dentária, Enamel microabrasion, Orthodontics, Dental enamel, Dental prophylaxis