Prosthetic transfer impression accuracy evaluation for osseointegrated implants

Nenhuma Miniatura disponível

Data

2008-09-01

Autores

Assunção, Wirley Goncalves [UNESP]
Tabata, Lucas Fernando [UNESP]
Cardoso, Alessandra
Rocha, Eduardo Passos [UNESP]
Gomes, Erica Alves [UNESP]

Título da Revista

ISSN da Revista

Título de Volume

Editor

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Resumo

Purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare 3 impression techniques for osseointegrated implant transfer procedures.Materials and Methods: (1) Group Splinted with Acrylic Resin (SAR), impression with square copings splinted with prefabricated autopolymerizing acrylic resin bar; (2) Group Splinted with Light-Curing Resin (SLR), impression, with square copings splinted with prefabricated light-curing composite resin bar; (3). Group Independent Air-abraded (IAA), impression with independent square coping aluminum oxide air-abraded. Impression procedures were performed with polyether material, and the data obtained was compared with a control group. These were characterized by metal matrix (MM) measurement values of the implants inclination positions at 90 and 05 degrees in relation to the matrix surface. Readings of analogs and implant inclinations were assessed randomly through graphic computation AutoCAD software. Experimental groups angular deviation with MM were submitted to analysis of variance and means were compared through Tukey's test (P < 0.05).Results: There was no statistical significant difference between SAR and SLR experimental groups and MM for vertical and angulated implants. Group IAA presented a statistically significant difference for angulated implants.Conclusion: It was concluded within the limitations of this study, that SAR and SLR produced more accurate casts than IAA technique, which presented inferior results.

Descrição

Palavras-chave

dental implants, prosthodontics, impression materials, impression techniques

Como citar

Implant Dentistry. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, v. 17, n. 3, p. 248-252, 2008.