Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAssunção, Wirley Goncalves [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorTabata, Lucas Fernando [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCardoso, Alessandra
dc.contributor.authorRocha, Eduardo Passos [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGomes, Erica Alves [UNESP]
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-30T18:30:15Z
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:43:48Z
dc.date.available2013-09-30T18:30:15Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:43:48Z
dc.date.issued2008-09-01
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e318182ef58
dc.identifier.citationImplant Dentistry. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, v. 17, n. 3, p. 248-252, 2008.
dc.identifier.issn1056-6163
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/15319
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare 3 impression techniques for osseointegrated implant transfer procedures.Materials and Methods: (1) Group Splinted with Acrylic Resin (SAR), impression with square copings splinted with prefabricated autopolymerizing acrylic resin bar; (2) Group Splinted with Light-Curing Resin (SLR), impression, with square copings splinted with prefabricated light-curing composite resin bar; (3). Group Independent Air-abraded (IAA), impression with independent square coping aluminum oxide air-abraded. Impression procedures were performed with polyether material, and the data obtained was compared with a control group. These were characterized by metal matrix (MM) measurement values of the implants inclination positions at 90 and 05 degrees in relation to the matrix surface. Readings of analogs and implant inclinations were assessed randomly through graphic computation AutoCAD software. Experimental groups angular deviation with MM were submitted to analysis of variance and means were compared through Tukey's test (P < 0.05).Results: There was no statistical significant difference between SAR and SLR experimental groups and MM for vertical and angulated implants. Group IAA presented a statistically significant difference for angulated implants.Conclusion: It was concluded within the limitations of this study, that SAR and SLR produced more accurate casts than IAA technique, which presented inferior results.en
dc.format.extent248-252
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins
dc.relation.ispartofImplant Dentistry
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectdental implantsen
dc.subjectprosthodonticsen
dc.subjectimpression materialsen
dc.subjectimpression techniquesen
dc.titleProsthetic transfer impression accuracy evaluation for osseointegrated implantsen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.licensehttp://edmgr.ovid.com/spine/accounts/copyrightTransfer.pdf
dcterms.rightsHolderLippincott Williams & Wilkins
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ, UNESP, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ, UNESP, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, São Paulo, Brazil
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/ID.0b013e318182ef58
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000259386100003
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araçatubapt
dc.identifier.lattes4438747643373395
dc.identifier.lattes3383392287039820
unesp.author.lattes4438747643373395
unesp.author.lattes3383392287039820
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-8903-0737[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-1454-8360[5]
dc.relation.ispartofjcr1.307
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,712
Localize o texto completo

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record