Influência do padrão de carga micro e nanométricas na rugosidade superficial de dentes humanos clareados e submetidos a diferentes tratamentos superficiais
Carregando...
Data
2018-05-11
Autores
Araujo, Ariani Tainara Silva de
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Resumo
A constante procura por procedimentos estéticos têm levado muitos pacientes e dentistas a realizarem o clareamento dental, por se tratar de um procedimento mini-mamente invasivo e conservador. Porém o gel clareador pode resultar em alterações estruturais do esmalte e afetar negativamente esta superfície. O objetivo deste estu-do in vitro foi avaliar a rugosidade e morfologia superficial do esmalte após o proto-colo de clareamento e os diferentes tratamentos superficiais de polimento. Para is-to, quarenta e oito (48) pré-molares humanos foram selecionados e clareados com o gel Opalescence Boost PF 40% (Ultradent) de acordo com a recomendação do fa-bricante. Após os protocolos de clareamento, os espécimes foram divididos em 8 grupos (n=6) e submetidos a polimento com: G1- Enamelize™ + Lummina E – Alu-mina, G2- Diamond Polish Paste™ + Lummina E - Diamond, G3- Lummina E - Di-amond, G4- discos abrasivos Sof-Lex Pop On® ultrafino, G5- Enamelize®, G6- Lummina E – Alumina, G7- Diamond Polish Paste® e G8- disco de feltro Diamond Flex®. Os espécimes foram submetidos as análises de perfilometria e microscopia de força atômica (AFM), para avaliar a rugosidade e morfologia superficial do esmal-te respectivamente. Ambas análises foram realizadas em dente hígido (baseline), clareado e polido. Para a avaliação da rugosidade superficial do esmalte dental hu-mano foi empregado o procedimento estatístico ANOVA de medidas repetidas com correção de Greenhouse-Geisser, seguido de comparações múltiplas com correção de Bonferroni, ao nível de significância de 5%. Observou-se que o uso do gel clare-ador Opalescence Boost PF 40% aumentou significativamente a rugosidade super-ficial do esmalte (p< 0,05). Os tratamentos superficiais que apresentaram diferenças estatisticamente significantes (p< 0,05) foram G1, G2, G3, G5, G6. E os tratamentos que não apresentaram diferença estatística foram os grupos G4, G7 e G8 (p>0.05), sendo o G8 o menos efetivo. Com relação a morfologia superficial do esmalte (AFM) também observaram alterações significantes em relação ao clareamento e ao poli-mento da superfície do esmalte. Conclui-se que o gel de peróxido de hidrogênio a 40% (Opaslescence Boost PF), promoveu alteração na rugosidade superficial do esmalte e que alguns dos tratamentos superficiais de polimento reverteu essas alte-rações sendo que os mais efetivos foram G1, G2, G3, G5 e G6 e o menos efetivo foi G8.
Many patients have searched cosmetic procedures such as tooth bleaching once it is a minimally invasive and conservative treatment. However bleaching gel can cause enamel structural changes and negatively affect its surface. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the enamel roughness and surface morphology after bleaching protocol and different surface polishing treatments. Forty-eight human premolars were bleached using 40% Opalescence Boost PF (Ultradent) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Afterwards, the specimens were divided into 8 groups (n = 6) and polished using: G1- Enamelize™ + Lummina E – Alumina, G2- Diamond Polishing Paste™ + Lummina E - Diamond, G3- Lummina E - Diamond, G4- Sof-Lex Pop On® ultra-fine abrasive discs, G5- Enamelize®, G6- Lummina E – Alumina, G7- Diamond Polishing Paste® and G8- Diamond Flex® felt disc. The specimens were submitted to profilometry and atomic force microscopy (AFM) analy-sis to evaluate the enamel roughness and surface morphology. Both analyzes were performed on a sound (baseline), bleached and polished tooth. Surface roughness data were submitted to ANOVA and Greenhouse-Geisser correction, followed by multiple comparisons with Bonferroni correction, at 5% significance level. 40% Opalescence Boost PF bleaching gel significantly increased the enamel surface roughness (p <0.05). G1, G2, G3, G5, G6, showed statistically significant differences (p <0.05). G4, G7 and G8 did not show statistical difference (p> 0.05), G8 was the least effective treatment. Regarding the enamel surface morphology (AFM), signifi-cant changes were observed after bleaching and polishing. This study concluded that 40% hydrogen peroxide gel changed the enamel surface roughness. G1, G2, G3, G5 and G6 were the most effective surface polishing treatments and G8 was less one.
Many patients have searched cosmetic procedures such as tooth bleaching once it is a minimally invasive and conservative treatment. However bleaching gel can cause enamel structural changes and negatively affect its surface. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the enamel roughness and surface morphology after bleaching protocol and different surface polishing treatments. Forty-eight human premolars were bleached using 40% Opalescence Boost PF (Ultradent) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Afterwards, the specimens were divided into 8 groups (n = 6) and polished using: G1- Enamelize™ + Lummina E – Alumina, G2- Diamond Polishing Paste™ + Lummina E - Diamond, G3- Lummina E - Diamond, G4- Sof-Lex Pop On® ultra-fine abrasive discs, G5- Enamelize®, G6- Lummina E – Alumina, G7- Diamond Polishing Paste® and G8- Diamond Flex® felt disc. The specimens were submitted to profilometry and atomic force microscopy (AFM) analy-sis to evaluate the enamel roughness and surface morphology. Both analyzes were performed on a sound (baseline), bleached and polished tooth. Surface roughness data were submitted to ANOVA and Greenhouse-Geisser correction, followed by multiple comparisons with Bonferroni correction, at 5% significance level. 40% Opalescence Boost PF bleaching gel significantly increased the enamel surface roughness (p <0.05). G1, G2, G3, G5, G6, showed statistically significant differences (p <0.05). G4, G7 and G8 did not show statistical difference (p> 0.05), G8 was the least effective treatment. Regarding the enamel surface morphology (AFM), signifi-cant changes were observed after bleaching and polishing. This study concluded that 40% hydrogen peroxide gel changed the enamel surface roughness. G1, G2, G3, G5 and G6 were the most effective surface polishing treatments and G8 was less one.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Clareamento dental, Esmalte dentário, Polimento dentário, Tooth bleaching, Dental enamel, Dental Polishing