Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, J. A. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorHug, I.
dc.contributor.authorDiniz, M. B. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLussi, A.
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-30T18:31:25Z
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:44:55Z
dc.date.available2013-09-30T18:31:25Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:44:55Z
dc.date.issued2008-01-01
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000148162
dc.identifier.citationCaries Research. Basel: Karger, v. 42, n. 4, p. 297-304, 2008.
dc.identifier.issn0008-4166
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/15762
dc.description.abstractThis study compared the performance of fluorescence-based methods, radiographic examination, and International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) II on occlusal surfaces. One hundred and nineteen permanent human molars were assessed twice by 2 experienced dentists using the laser fluorescence (LF and LFpen) and fluorescence camera (FC) devices, ICDAS II and bitewing radiographs (BW). After measuring, the teeth were histologically prepared and assessed for caries extension. The sensitivities for dentine caries detection were 0.86 (FC), 0.78 (LFpen), 0.73 (ICDAS II), 0.51 (LF) and 0.34 (BW). The specificities were 0.97 (BW), 0.89 (LF), 0.65 (ICDAS II), 0.63 (FC) and 0.56 (LFpen). BW presented the highest values of likelihood ratio (LR)+ (12.47) and LR- (0.68). Rank correlations with histology were 0.53 (LF), 0.52 (LFpen), 0.41 (FC), 0.59 (ICDAS II) and 0.57 (BW). The area under the ROC curve varied from 0.72 to 0.83. Inter- and intraexaminer intraclass correlation values were respectively 0.90 and 0.85 (LF), 0.93 and 0.87 (LFpen) and 0.85 and 0.76 (FC). The ICDAS II kappa values were 0.51 (interexaminer) and 0.61 (intraexaminer). The BW kappa values were 0.50 (interexaminer) and 0.62 (intraexaminer). The Bland and Altman limits of agreement were 46.0 and 38.2 (LF), 55.6 and 40.0 (LFpen) and 1.12 and 0.80 (FC), for intra- and interexaminer reproducibilities. The posttest probability for dentine caries detection was high for BW and LF. In conclusion, LFpen, FC and ICDAS II presented better sensitivity and LF and BW better specificity. ICDAS II combined with BW showed the best performance and is the best combination for detecting caries on occlusal surfaces. Copyright (C) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.en
dc.format.extent297-304
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherKarger
dc.relation.ispartofCaries Research
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectcaries detectionen
dc.subjectDIAGNOdenten
dc.subjectDIAGNOdent penen
dc.subjectfluorescence cameraen
dc.subjectInternational Caries Detection and Assessment Systemen
dc.subjectlaser fluorescenceen
dc.subjectocclusal cariesen
dc.titlePerformance of fluorescence methods, radiographic examination and ICDAS II on occlusal surfaces in vitroen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.licensehttp://www.karger.com/Journal/Guidelines/238704#15
dcterms.rightsHolderKarger
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Bern
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.description.affiliationUniv Bern, Sch Dent Med, Dept Prevent Restorat & Pediat Dent, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ UNESP, Sch Dent, Dept Pediat Dent, Araraquara, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ UNESP, Sch Dent, Dept Pediat Dent, Araraquara, Brazil
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000148162
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000258317800010
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquarapt
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-8887-2329[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-0693-2162[3]
dc.relation.ispartofjcr1.243
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,579
Localize o texto completo

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record