Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDuarte Villa, Rafael A.
dc.contributor.authorde Souza Pimenta, Marilia Carolina B. [UNESP]
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T16:47:34Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T16:47:34Z
dc.date.issued2017-01-01
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-01912017231261
dc.identifier.citationOpiniao Publica, v. 23, n. 1, p. 261-288, 2017.
dc.identifier.issn1807-0191
dc.identifier.issn0104-6276
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/169781
dc.description.abstractOver the last 40 years, investigations have shown the discipline of International Relations to reproduce the American influence on its methods, paradigms, and institutional dynamics. This article explores the case for the Latin American community, based on the survey data from the Teaching, Research, and International Politics project (TRIP) 2014 developed by the Institute for the Theory and Practice of International Relations of the College of William and Mary, Virginia (USA). TRIP evaluated International Relations communities in 32 countries around the world. The article aims to answer two main questions: (i) is American influence still dominant over epistemological, methodological, paradigmatic, and institutional representative terms in Latin American International Relations communities, as has been considered in the past? (ii) Is there in the region any contestation to this supposed influence? Primarily, the present article shows an affirmative answer for the first issue. Therefore, and most importantly, the data analysis shows upcoming local pressures rooted in American influence, especially on its epistemic and paradigmatic terms. The data strengthens the miscegenation tendency on its epistemological and paradigmatic aspects, which underlines a lack of consensus over the structure of American dominance over the discipline of International Relations in Latin America, especially if one observes the most numerous and structured group in the region: The Brazilian International Relations community.en
dc.format.extent261-288
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofOpiniao Publica
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAmerican influence
dc.subjectInternational relations
dc.subjectLatin America
dc.subjectTRIP
dc.titleIs international relations still an American social science discipline in Latin America?en
dc.typeArtigo
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationDepartment DCP-USP Institute of International Relations IRI-USP Director of the Center for Research in International Relations NUPRI-USP University of São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationCenter for Research in International Relations NUPRI-USP Researcher at the Institute of International Economics Studies IEEI-UNESP Anhembi Morumbi University-UAM University Center FECAP
dc.description.affiliationUnespCenter for Research in International Relations NUPRI-USP Researcher at the Institute of International Economics Studies IEEI-UNESP Anhembi Morumbi University-UAM University Center FECAP
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/1807-01912017231261
dc.identifier.scieloS0104-62762017000100261
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85019967442
dc.identifier.fileS0104-62762017000100261.pdf
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,573
Localize o texto completo

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record