Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCarciofi, Aulus Cavalieri [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorde-Oliveira, Luciana Dorningues [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorValerio, Ana Gabriela [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBorges, Liliana Longo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorde Carvalho, Fernanda Maria [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBrunetto, Marcio Antonio [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorVasconcellos, Ricardo Souza [UNESP]
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:14:14Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:14:14Z
dc.date.issued2009-05-26
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.01.002
dc.identifier.citationAnimal Feed Science and Technology. Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V., v. 151, n. 3-4, p. 251-260, 2009.
dc.identifier.issn0377-8401
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/1759
dc.description.abstractThe current investigation compared coefficients of total tract apparent digestibility (CTTAD), postprandial blood urea response and faecal characteristics for three isonutrient foods formulated with micronized whole soybeans (mu SB), soybean meal (SBM) or poultry by-product meal (PPM) in dog diets and digestibility, palatability and faecal characteristics for two isonutrient foods employing either mu SB or maize gluten meal (CGM) in cats diets. These protein sources represented 0.40 and 0.60 of total dietary protein in cat and dogs diets, respectively. In dogs CTTAD showed that mu SB resulted in greater dry matter and fat digestibility than the PPM diet (P<0.05), and greater fat digestibility than the SBM (P<0.05) diet. Digestibility of fat was higher in the mu SB diet fed to cats than in CGM diet (P<0.05). Faecal quality and production for both species was similar among all diets, with the exception of faecal dry matter that was greater (P<0.05) in dogs fed the PPM diet. Greater palatability, demonstrated as increased consumption (P<0.01), was verified for the mu SB diet fed to cats. Mean incremental serum urea concentration and its incremental area under the curve were not different among treatments fed to dogs. it was concluded that micronized whole soybeans in combination with other protein sources containing complementary amino acids area source of highly available, quality-consistent protein raw materials for both dog and cat diets. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en
dc.description.sponsorshipPerdigao S.A., Brazil
dc.description.sponsorshipMogiana Alimentos S.A (Guabi), Brazil
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.format.extent251-260
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.relation.ispartofAnimal Feed Science and Technology
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectAnimal dietsen
dc.subjectDigestibilityen
dc.subjectPlant proteinsen
dc.subjectPoultry productsen
dc.subjectSoybean proteinsen
dc.titleComparison of micronized whole soybeans to common protein sources in dry dog and cat dietsen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.licensehttp://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policy
dcterms.rightsHolderElsevier B.V.
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ, UNESP, Dept Clin & Cirurgia Vet, BR-14884900 Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ, UNESP, Dept Clin & Cirurgia Vet, BR-14884900 Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.01.002
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000266681300008
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Jaboticabalpt
dc.identifier.lattes4620650316029248
unesp.author.lattes4620650316029248
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-3859-3983[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-3306-1331[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-8364-9152[6]
dc.relation.ispartofjcr2.143
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,937
Localize o texto completo

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record