Quantification of parametric uncertainties effects in structural failure criteria
Carregando...
Arquivos
Data
2019-02-04
Autores
Yanik, Yasar
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Resumo
Critérios de falhas realizam a predição de circunstâncias nas quais materiais sólidos estão sobre ação de carregamentos externos. As teorias de falhas são conhecidas como diferentes critérios de falhas, como von Mises e Tresca, os quais são os mais famosos para determinados materiais. Além disso, esta dissertação de mestrado pretende mostrar a comparação entre os critérios de falha de Tresca e von Mises, levando em conta incertezas subjacentes nas equações constitutivas e na análise de tensão. Para exemplificar acomparação,algumassimulaçõessãorealizadasusandoumaplacasimples,umproblema de deflexão simples,e a estrutura de um carro do formula SAE. Devido à complexidade deste sistema, diferentes tipos de etapas probabilísticas são utilizadas, como o método de superfície de resposta e a correlação de parâmetros. Os resultados mostram que várias variáveis aleatórias de entrada afetam em maneiras diferentes as variáveis aleatórias de saída e que não há uma diferença grande entre os critérios de falha de von Mises e Tresca quando incertezas são assumidas na formulação para a análise de tensão.
Failure theory is the investigation of predicting circumstances under which solid materials under the processing of external loads. The theories of failure are known as different failure criteria such as von Mises and Tresca which are the most famous of these for certain materials. Additionally, this master dissertation intends to show a comparison between Tresca and von Mises failure criterions, taking into account the underlying uncertainties in the constitutive equations and stress analysis. In order to exemplify the comparison, some numerical simulations are performed using a simple plate, simple deflection problem and a frame of the formula car. Due to the complexity of frame of the formula car, different kind of probabilistic steps are used as a response surface method and parameters correlation. Results show that several random input variables effect the random output variables in various ways, and there is no such a big difference between the von Mises and Tresca failure criterions when uncertainties are assumed in the formulation for stress analysis.
Failure theory is the investigation of predicting circumstances under which solid materials under the processing of external loads. The theories of failure are known as different failure criteria such as von Mises and Tresca which are the most famous of these for certain materials. Additionally, this master dissertation intends to show a comparison between Tresca and von Mises failure criterions, taking into account the underlying uncertainties in the constitutive equations and stress analysis. In order to exemplify the comparison, some numerical simulations are performed using a simple plate, simple deflection problem and a frame of the formula car. Due to the complexity of frame of the formula car, different kind of probabilistic steps are used as a response surface method and parameters correlation. Results show that several random input variables effect the random output variables in various ways, and there is no such a big difference between the von Mises and Tresca failure criterions when uncertainties are assumed in the formulation for stress analysis.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Critérios de falha, Análise de tensão, Quantificação de incerteza, Probabilística paramétrica, Método de Monte-Carlo, Failure criterions, Stress analysis, Uncertainty quantification, Parametric probabilistic approach, Monte-Carlo method