Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCavalheri, Vinicius
dc.contributor.authorBurtin, Chris
dc.contributor.authorFormico, Vittoria R. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorNonoyama, Mika L.
dc.contributor.authorJenkins, Sue
dc.contributor.authorSpruit, Martijn A.
dc.contributor.authorHill, Kylie
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-06T16:35:32Z
dc.date.available2019-10-06T16:35:32Z
dc.date.issued2019-06-17
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009955.pub3
dc.identifier.citationCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, v. 2019, n. 6, 2019.
dc.identifier.issn1469-493X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/189274
dc.description.abstractBackground Decreased exercise capacity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are common in people following lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Exercise training has been demonstrated to confer gains in exercise capacity and HRQoL for people with a range of chronic conditions, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure, as well as in people with prostate and breast cancer. A programme of exercise training may also confer gains in these outcomes for people following lung resection for NSCLC. This systematic review updates our 2013 systematic review. Objectives The primary aim of this review was to determine the effects of exercise training on exercise capacity and adverse events in people following lung resection (with or without chemotherapy) for NSCLC. The secondary aims were to determine the effects of exercise training on other outcomes such as HRQoL, force-generating capacity of peripheral muscles, pressure-generating capacity of the respiratory muscles, dyspnoea and fatigue, feelings of anxiety and depression, lung function, and mortality. Search methods We searched for additional randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (the Cochrane Library 2019, Issue 2 of 12), MEDLINE (via PubMed) (2013 to February 2019), Embase (via Ovid) (2013 to February 2019), SciELO (The Scientific Electronic Library Online) (2013 to February 2019), and PEDro (Physiotherapy Evidence Database) (2013 to February 2019). Selection criteria We included RCTs in which participants with NSCLC who underwent lung resection were allocated to receive either exercise training, which included aerobic exercise, resistance exercise, or a combination of both, or no exercise training. Data collection and analysis Two review authors screened the studies and identified those eligible for inclusion. We used either postintervention values (with their respective standard deviation (SD)) or mean changes (with their respective SD) in the meta-analyses that reported results as mean difference (MD). In meta-analyses that reported results as standardised mean difference (SMD), we placed studies that reported postintervention values and those that reported mean changes in separate subgroups. We assessed the certainty of evidence for each outcome by downgrading or upgrading the evidence according to GRADE criteria. Main results Along with the three RCTs included in the original version of this review (2013), we identified an additional five RCTs in this update, resulting in a total of eight RCTs involving 450 participants (180 (40%) females). The risk of selection bias in the included studies was low and the risk of performance bias high. Six studies explored the effects of combined aerobic and resistance training; one explored the effects of combined aerobic and inspiratory muscle training; and one explored the effects of combined aerobic, resistance, inspiratory muscle training and balance training. On completion of the intervention period, compared to the control group, exercise capacity expressed as the peak rate of oxygen uptake (VO2peak) and six-minute walk distance (6MWD) was greater in the intervention group (VO2peak: MD 2.97 mL/kg/min, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.93 to 4.02 mL/kg/min, 4 studies, 135 participants, moderate-certainty evidence; 6MWD: MD 57 m, 95% CI 34 to 80 m, 5 studies, 182 participants, high-certainty evidence). One adverse event (hip fracture) related to the intervention was reported in one of the included studies. The intervention group also achieved greater improvements in the physical component of general HRQoL (MD 5.0 points, 95% CI 2.3 to 7.7 points, 4 studies, 208 participants, low-certainty evidence); improved force-generating capacity of the quadriceps muscle (SMD 0.75, 95% CI 0.4 to 1.1, 4 studies, 133 participants, moderate-certainty evidence); and less dyspnoea (SMD −0.43, 95% CI −0.81 to −0.05, 3 studies, 110 participants, very low-certainty evidence). We observed uncertain effects on the mental component of general HRQoL, disease-specific HRQoL, handgrip force, fatigue, and lung function. There were insufficient data to comment on the effect of exercise training on maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures and feelings of anxiety and depression. Mortality was not reported in the included studies. Authors’ conclusions Exercise training increased exercise capacity and quadriceps muscle force of people following lung resection for NSCLC. Our findings also suggest improvements on the physical component score of general HRQoL and decreased dyspnoea. This systematic review emphasises the importance of exercise training as part of the postoperative management of people with NSCLC.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleExercise training undertaken by people within 12 months of lung resection for non-small cell lung canceren
dc.typeArtigo
dc.contributor.institutionCurtin University
dc.contributor.institutionSir Charles Gairdner Hospital
dc.contributor.institutionHasselt University
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Ontario Institute of Technology
dc.contributor.institutionCIRO
dc.contributor.institutionMaastricht University Medical Center
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science Faculty of Health Sciences Curtin University
dc.description.affiliationInstitute for Respiratory Health Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital
dc.description.affiliationReval Rehabilitation Research Center BIOMED Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences Hasselt University
dc.description.affiliationPhysiotherapy Department Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationFaculty of Health Sciences University of Ontario Institute of Technology
dc.description.affiliationPhysiotherapy Department Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital
dc.description.affiliationResearch and Education CIRO
dc.description.affiliationRespiratory Medicine NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism Maastricht University Medical Center
dc.description.affiliationUnespPhysiotherapy Department Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/14651858.CD009955.pub3
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85067409203
Localize o texto completo

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record