Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMantovanini, Luana Jandhy [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Renan Gonçalves da [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Jóice de Oliveira Leite
dc.contributor.authordos Santos, Thiago Mateus Rosa [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authordos Santos, Durvalina Maria Mathias [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorZingaretti, Sonia Marli
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-06T17:06:22Z
dc.date.available2019-10-06T17:06:22Z
dc.date.issued2019-02-01
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.19.13.02.p1198
dc.identifier.citationAustralian Journal of Crop Science, v. 13, n. 2, p. 208-213, 2019.
dc.identifier.issn1835-2707
dc.identifier.issn1835-2693
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/190226
dc.description.abstractThe potential of sugarcane as a food and bioenergy crop is currently driving the expansion of sugarcane production areas throughout the world. This crop may be constantly subjected to unusual environments such as acid soils with aluminum in toxic form (Al 3+ ), leading to problems in cultivation when the soil is not properly prepared. The aim of this research was to select most tolerant sugarcane genotypes to aluminum toxicity by determining root growth and proline content in the leaves. The experiment employed a factorial that was entirely randomized, with four sugarcane genotypes (CTC-2, CTC-14, RB855453, and RB966928) combined with aluminum concentrations (45, 88, 221, 444, 600, 897, 1000 μmol L -1 ), with three replications. Our results suggest that CTC-2 showed higher tolerance to aluminum, with more biomass accumulation in roots when compared to the other genotypes (descending order of tolerance: CTC-2 > CTC-14 > RB855453 > RB966928). Proline level was clearly different for tested genotypes. CTC-2 showed an increase of 58% in the proline level, while genotype RB855453 showed a 24% increase, but only when the aluminum concentration was 897μmolL -1 .en
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.format.extent208-213
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAustralian Journal of Crop Science
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAbiotic stress
dc.subjectOsmoprotector
dc.subjectRoots
dc.subjectSaccharum spp.
dc.subjectToxicity
dc.titleRoot system development and proline accumulation in sugarcane leaves under aluminum (Al 3+ ) stressen
dc.typeArtigo
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Ribeirão Preto
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State University (UNESP School of Agriculture and Veterinarian Sciences Jaboticabal)
dc.description.affiliationBiotechnology Unit University of Ribeirão Preto
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State University (UNESP School of Agriculture and Veterinarian Sciences Jaboticabal)
dc.identifier.doi10.21475/ajcs.19.13.02.p1198
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 14/19667-8
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85063496119
Localize o texto completo

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record