Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorIzzicupo, Pascal
dc.contributor.authorDi Baldassarre, Angela
dc.contributor.authorGhinassi, Barbara
dc.contributor.authorReichert, Felipe Fossati
dc.contributor.authorKokubun, Eduardo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorNakamura, Fábio Yuzo
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-06T17:13:55Z
dc.date.available2019-10-06T17:13:55Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00448
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Physiology, v. 10, n. APR, 2019.
dc.identifier.issn1664-042X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/190460
dc.description.abstractRecently, the attention on recovery in sport increased enormously although there is lack of scientific evidence on the role of lifestyle in terms of movement [i.e., physical behaviors (PBs)], apart from sleep. Few studies assessed physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) in athletes. The aims of this scoping review were to answer to the following scientific questions: (1) How active/inactive are competitive athletes out of training? (2) Do off-training PBs affect recovery, performance, and health? (3) What strategies can be implemented to improve recovery using off-training PBs, apart from sleep? From 1,116 potentially relevant articles, nine were eligible for inclusion in this review. The main issues identified were related to the heterogeneity concerning the types of sports, age category, gender, competitive level, sample size, and instruments/devices adopted, the paucity of studies investigating the effects of PBs while awake on recovery, and the lack of experimental designs manipulating PBs while awake to accelerate recovery. Furthermore, PA and SB domains were rarely investigated, while no research articles focused on the combined effect of 24-h PBs. Eight out of nine studies measured PA, seven SB, and two included sleep. Three studies included training practice into PA measurement by the means of accelerometry. Overall, almost the totality of the athletes achieved recommended PA levels although they sustained prolonged SB. In conclusion, more descriptive researches are needed in different athletic populations and settings. Furthermore, experimental designs aimed at investigating the effects of PBs manipulation on recovery and the putative mechanisms are encouraged.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Physiology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAccelerometry
dc.subjectAthletes' health and life
dc.subjectNon-exercise activity
dc.subjectPhysical activity measurement
dc.subjectPhysical activity questionnaires
dc.subjectScreen time behavior
dc.subjectSedentary behavior
dc.subjectSitting interruptions
dc.titleCan off-training physical behaviors influence recovery in athletes? A scoping reviewen
dc.typeResenha
dc.contributor.institutionG. d'Annunzio University of Chieti and Pescara
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Pelotas
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionJames Cook University
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB)
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Medicine and Aging Sciences G. d'Annunzio University of Chieti and Pescara
dc.description.affiliationSuperior School of Physical Education Federal University of Pelotas
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Physical Education São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationCollege of Healthcare Sciences James Cook University
dc.description.affiliationGraduate Program in Physical Education UPE/UFPB
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Physical Education São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fphys.2019.00448
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85068255218
Localize o texto completo

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record