O periódico científico como forma de representação de domínio em ciência da informação: uma análise da revista BRAJIS (2006-2019)
Carregando...
Data
2020-12-17
Autores
Rego Piva, Laura Maria [UNESP]
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Resumo
A revista Brazilian Journal of Information Science: research trends - BRAJIS, em sua trajetória de mais de uma década, agrega um conjunto de conhecimento produzidos, a partir de uma determinada política editorial, conjunto esse que, por sua vez, revela interações, articulações dialógicas. A vista disso, o presente estudo teve como objetivo caracterizar a Revista BRAJIS como um domínio a partir do panorama da produção científica por ela veiculada. Para tanto, realizou-se um estudo exploratório e descritivo, valendo-se de revisão bibliográfica sobre os periódicos científicos, bem como de uma análise de domínio sob as abordagens histórica e bibliométrica, tal como preconizado por Hjørland (2002), a partir das publicações no período de 2006 a 2019, divido em três momentos: 2006-2010; 2011-2015; 2016-2019. Tal análise justifica-se por fornecer subsídios metodológicos à avaliação de periódicos científicos, para assim contribuir tanto para estudos internos (autoavaliação do PPGCI-Unesp) quanto para os externos, relativos à avaliação de periódicos científicos eletrônicos. No tocante à produção científica veiculada na revista, os resultados sinalizam para uma grande diversidade de autores e, por conseguinte, uma presença de diferentes abordagens e de influências teóricas, embora os autores mais produtivos pertençam à UNESP, revelando, de certa forma, um ainda considerável grau de endogenia nos autores mais produtivos. Esses aspectos são observados também quando analisamos a vinculação institucional dos autores. No que tange ao espectro temático, a análise das palavras-chave revelou a preponderância de quatro núcleos temáticos que contemplam três subáreas de estudo da Ciência da Informação e uma ambiência informacional: Gestão da informação e do conhecimento (com 33 incidências), Estudos métricos em informação (com 24 incidências); Biblioteca universitária (com 10 incidências) e Organização do conhecimento (com 8 incidências), ligados. Ressalta-se o fato de que as três subáreas de estudo preponderantes encontram reflexo nas temáticas de duas das três linhas de pesquisa do PPGCI-Unesp. Sobre as citações, observa-se que a elite de autores é composta por autores voltados para a construção teórico-conceitual da Ciência da Informação, autores que subsidiam os estudos de Gestão do Conhecimento, e aqueles relativos à competência informacional.
The Brazilian Journal of Information Science: research trends - BRAJIS, in its trajectory of more than a decade, aggregates a set of knowledge produced, based on a certain editorial policy, a set that reveals interactions and dialogical articulations. In this sense, the present study aimed to characterize the BRAJIS Journal as a domain from the perspective of the scientific production that it disseminates. To this, an exploratory and descriptive study was carried out, using a bibliographic review of scientific journals, as well as a domain analysis under the historical and bibliometric approaches, as recommended by Hjørland (2002), based on the publications in the period from 2006 to 2019, divided into three moments: 2006-2010; 2011-2015; 2016-2019. Such analysis was justified by providing methodological subsidies for the evaluation of scientific journals, in order to contribute to both internal studies (PPGCIUnesp self-evaluation) and external studies related to the evaluation of electronic scientific journals. Regarding the scientific production published in the journal, the results point out to a great diversity of authors and, therefore, a presence of different approaches and theoretical influences, although the most productive authors belong to UNESP, revealing, in a way, a still considerable degree of endogeny in the most productive authors. These aspects are also observed when we analyzed the institutional link of the authors. Regarding the thematic spectrum, the analysis of the keywords revealed the preponderance of four thematic dimensions that contemplate three sub-areas of study of Information Science: Information and knowledge management (with 33 incidences), Metric studies in information (with 24 incidences); University library (with 10 incidences) and Knowledge organization (with 8 incidences). It should be noted that the three predominant sub-areas of study are reflected on the scope in two of the three research lines of PPGCI-Unesp. Regarding the citations, it is observed that the elite of authors is composed of authors focused on the theoretical-conceptual construction of Information Science, authors who subsidize Knowledge Management studies, and those related to informational competence.
The Brazilian Journal of Information Science: research trends - BRAJIS, in its trajectory of more than a decade, aggregates a set of knowledge produced, based on a certain editorial policy, a set that reveals interactions and dialogical articulations. In this sense, the present study aimed to characterize the BRAJIS Journal as a domain from the perspective of the scientific production that it disseminates. To this, an exploratory and descriptive study was carried out, using a bibliographic review of scientific journals, as well as a domain analysis under the historical and bibliometric approaches, as recommended by Hjørland (2002), based on the publications in the period from 2006 to 2019, divided into three moments: 2006-2010; 2011-2015; 2016-2019. Such analysis was justified by providing methodological subsidies for the evaluation of scientific journals, in order to contribute to both internal studies (PPGCIUnesp self-evaluation) and external studies related to the evaluation of electronic scientific journals. Regarding the scientific production published in the journal, the results point out to a great diversity of authors and, therefore, a presence of different approaches and theoretical influences, although the most productive authors belong to UNESP, revealing, in a way, a still considerable degree of endogeny in the most productive authors. These aspects are also observed when we analyzed the institutional link of the authors. Regarding the thematic spectrum, the analysis of the keywords revealed the preponderance of four thematic dimensions that contemplate three sub-areas of study of Information Science: Information and knowledge management (with 33 incidences), Metric studies in information (with 24 incidences); University library (with 10 incidences) and Knowledge organization (with 8 incidences). It should be noted that the three predominant sub-areas of study are reflected on the scope in two of the three research lines of PPGCI-Unesp. Regarding the citations, it is observed that the elite of authors is composed of authors focused on the theoretical-conceptual construction of Information Science, authors who subsidize Knowledge Management studies, and those related to informational competence.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Análise de domínio, Produção científica, Periódicos científicos, Domain analysis, Scientific production, Scientific journals