The contribution of air breathing to aerobic scope and exercise performance in the banded knifefish Gymnotus carapo L.

Nenhuma Miniatura disponível

Data

2012-04-01

Autores

McKenzie, David J. [UNESP]
Steffensen, John F.
Taylor, Edwin W. [UNESP]
Abe, Augusto Shinya [UNESP]

Título da Revista

ISSN da Revista

Título de Volume

Editor

Company of Biologists Ltd

Resumo

The contribution of air breathing to aerobic metabolic scope and exercise performance was investigated in a teleost with bimodal respiration, the banded knifefish, submitted to a critical swimming speed (U-crit) protocol at 30 degrees C. Seven individuals (mean +/- s.e.m. mass 89 +/- 7. g, total length 230 +/- 4. mm) achieved a U-crit of 2.1 +/- 1. body. lengths. (BL). s(-1) and an active metabolic rate (AMR) of 350 +/- 21. mg. kg(-1). h(-1), with 38 +/- 6% derived from air breathing. All of the knifefish exhibited a significant increase in air-breathing frequency (f(AB)) with swimming speed. If denied access to air in normoxia, these individuals achieved a U-crit of 2.0 +/- 0.2. BL. s(-1) and an AMR of 368 +/- 24. mg. kg(-1). h(-1) by gill ventilation alone. In normoxia, therefore, the contribution of air breathing to scope and exercise was entirely facultative. In aquatic hypoxia (P-O2=4. kPa) with access to normoxic air, the knifefish achieved a U-crit of 2.0 +/- 0.1. BL. s(-1) and an AMR of 338 +/- 29. mg. kg(-1). h(-1), similar to aquatic normoxia, but with 55 +/- 5% of AMR derived from air breathing. Indeed, f(AB) was higher than in normoxia at all swimming speeds, with a profound exponential increase during exercise. If the knifefish were denied access to air in hypoxia, U-crit declined to 1.2 +/- 0.1. BL. s(-1) and AMR declined to 199 +/- 29. mg. kg(-1). h(-1). Therefore, air breathing allowed the knifefish to avoid limitations to aerobic scope and exercise performance in aquatic hypoxia.

Descrição

Palavras-chave

critical swimming speed, hypoxia, metabolic rate, oxygen uptake, respirometry

Como citar

Journal of Experimental Biology. Cambridge: Company of Biologists Ltd, v. 215, n. 8, p. 1323-1330, 2012.