Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVarjao, Fabiana Mansur
dc.contributor.authorNogueira, Sergio Sualdini [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRussi, Sergio
dc.contributor.authorArioli Filho, João Neudenir [UNESP]
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T15:23:47Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T15:23:47Z
dc.date.issued2006-11-01
dc.identifierhttp://www.quintpub.com/journals/qi/abstract.php?article_id=2432#.UulaQLRTvIU
dc.identifier.citationQuintessence International. Hanover Park: Quintessence Publishing Co Inc., v. 37, n. 10, p. 767-771, 2006.
dc.identifier.issn0033-6572
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/34495
dc.description.abstractObjectives: the purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between central incisor form and face form in 4 racial groups and to investigate if there was agreement among experts in categorizing the central incisor forms. Method and Materials: A total of 160 subjects (40 whites, 40 mulattos, 40 blacks, and 40 Asians) ranging from 18 to 33 years of age were selected. Digital photographic records were made, 1 full-face and 1 intraoral view of the maxillary right central incisor. The outline tracings of the tooth and face images were obtained using Adobe Photoshop 5.0 software. The outline tracings were printed in distinct transparencies, and 3 prosthodontists determined if there was correspondence between the tooth and the face forms by superimposition of the transparencies. If there was disagreement among the prosthodontists' evaluations, the prevalent decision was considered. The experts also classified the central incisor forms into square, ovoid, tapering, or combination at 2 different sessions. At the first session, no instructions were given. At the second session, the prosthodontists were instructed to follow Williams' method of classification. Results: A correspondence between tooth and face forms was found in 23.75% of all cases. Agreement on the tooth form classifications among the prosthodontists occurred in 30.62% of all cases at the first session and 24.37% at the second session. Conclusion: There is not a highly defined correlation between central incisor form and face form in any racial group studied. In addition, the experts were not in fair agreement in categorizing tooth forms.en
dc.format.extent767-771
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherQuintessence Publishing Co Inc
dc.relation.ispartofQuintessence International
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectartificial teethpt
dc.subjectcomplete denturept
dc.subjectestheticspt
dc.subjectfacial morphologypt
dc.subjectracept
dc.subjecttooth morphologypt
dc.titleCorrelation between maxillary central incisor form and face form in 4 racial groupsen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.licensehttp://www.quintpub.com/terms.php
dcterms.rightsHolderQuintessence Publishing Co Inc
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Araraquara Dent Sch, Araraquara, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Araraquara Dent Sch, Araraquara, SP, Brazil
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000241466500004
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquarapt
dc.identifier.lattes0872749896035329
dc.identifier.lattes6380225075834021
unesp.author.lattes0872749896035329
unesp.author.lattes6380225075834021
dc.relation.ispartofjcr1.088
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,563
Localize o texto completo

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record