Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSouza, Rodrigo O.A. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLombardo, Geraldo H.L. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMichida, Silvia M.A. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGalhano, Graziela [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBottino, Marco Antônio [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorValandro, Luiz Felipe [UNESP]
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:22:44Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:22:44Z
dc.date.issued2007-12-01
dc.identifierhttp://www.quintpub.com/journals/jad/abstract.php?article_id=8965
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a12907
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Adhesive Dentistry, v. 9, n. 6, p. 521-526, 2007.
dc.identifier.issn1461-5185
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/70172
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the influence of the brush type as a earner of priming adhesive solutions and the use of paper points as a remover of the excess of these solutions on the push-out bond strength of resin cement to bovine root dentin. The null hypotheses were that brush type and the use of paper points do not affect the bond strength. Materials and Methods: The canals of 80 single-root bovine roots (16 mm in length) were prepared at 12 mm using the preparation drill (FRC Postec Plus, Ivoclar). Half of each root was embedded in acrylic resin and the specimens were divided into 8 groups, considering the factors brush type (4 levels) and paper point (2 levels) (n = 10): Gr 1: small microbrush (Cavi-Tip, SDI); Gr 2: Microbrush (Dentsply); Gr 3: Endobrush (Bisco); Gr 4: conventional brush (Bisco); Gr 5: Cavi-Tip (SDI) + paper points; Gr 6: Microbrush (Dentsply) + paper points; Gr 7: Endobrush (Bisco) + paper points; Gr 8: conventional brush (Bisco) + paper points. The root dentin was treated with a multistep total-etch adhesive system (All Bond 2). The adhesive system was applied using each microbrush, with and without using paper points. One fiber post was molded with addition silicon and 80 posts were made of resin cement (Duolink), The resin posts were luted (Duolink resin cement), and the specimens were stored for 24 h in water at 37°C. Each specimen was cut into 4 disk-shaped samples (1.8 mm in thickness), which were submitted to the push-out test. Results: The brush type (p < 0.0001) (small microbrush > microbrush = endobrush = conventional brush) and the use of paper points (p = 0.0001) (with > without) influenced the bond strength significantly (two-way ANOVA). The null hypotheses were rejected. Conclusion: The smallest brush (Cavi-Tip) and the use of paper points significantly improved the resin bond to bovine root dentin.en
dc.format.extent521-526
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Adhesive Dentistry
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBond strength
dc.subjectMicrobrush
dc.subjectPaper point
dc.subjectPush-out test
dc.subjectResin cement
dc.subjectRoot canal dentin
dc.subjectAll Bond 2
dc.subjectAll-Bond 2
dc.subjectdentin bonding agent
dc.subjectDuo Link
dc.subjectDuo-Link
dc.subjectmethacrylic acid derivative
dc.subjectresin cement
dc.subjectsilicone derivative
dc.subjectunclassified drug
dc.subjectwater
dc.subjectanimal
dc.subjectcattle
dc.subjectchemistry
dc.subjectdental acid etching
dc.subjectdental bonding
dc.subjectdentin
dc.subjectendodontics
dc.subjectequipment design
dc.subjectinstrumentation
dc.subjectmaterials testing
dc.subjectmechanical stress
dc.subjectmethodology
dc.subjectpaper
dc.subjectscanning electron microscopy
dc.subjectsurface property
dc.subjecttemperature
dc.subjecttime
dc.subjecttooth crown
dc.subjecttooth pulp
dc.subjectultrastructure
dc.subjectAcid Etching, Dental
dc.subjectAnimals
dc.subjectCattle
dc.subjectDental Bonding
dc.subjectDental Pulp Cavity
dc.subjectDentin
dc.subjectDentin-Bonding Agents
dc.subjectEquipment Design
dc.subjectMaterials Testing
dc.subjectMethacrylates
dc.subjectMicroscopy, Electron, Scanning
dc.subjectPaper
dc.subjectPost and Core Technique
dc.subjectResin Cements
dc.subjectRoot Canal Preparation
dc.subjectSilicones
dc.subjectStress, Mechanical
dc.subjectSurface Properties
dc.subjectTemperature
dc.subjectTime Factors
dc.subjectWater
dc.titleInfluence of brush type as a carrier of adhesive solutions and paper points as an adhesive-excess remover on the resin bond to root dentinen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.licensehttp://www.quintpub.com/terms.php
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Santa Maria
dc.contributor.institutionDivision of Prosthodontics
dc.description.affiliationSão Jose Dos Campos Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Jose Dos Campos Dental School São Paulo State University, São José dos Campos
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Federal University of Santa Maria
dc.description.affiliationPhD and MS Graduate Program São Jose Dos Campos Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationFederal University of Santa Maria Department of Restorative Dentistry Division of Prosthodontics, Rua Marechal Floriano, 1184, 97015-372, Santa Maria
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Jose Dos Campos Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Jose Dos Campos Dental School São Paulo State University, São José dos Campos
dc.description.affiliationUnespPhD and MS Graduate Program São Jose Dos Campos Dental School São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.identifier.doi10.3290/j.jad.a12907
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000251741800006
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-37549064333
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, São José dos Campospt
dc.identifier.lattes9234456003563666
unesp.author.lattes9234456003563666
dc.relation.ispartofjcr1.691
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,839
Localize o texto completo

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record