Análise dos fotoiniciadores presentes em resinas compostas em função da cor
Carregando...
Data
2005-03-02
Autores
Alvim, Hugo Henriques [UNESP]
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Resumo
O objetivo deste estudo foi identificar e quantificar os fotoiniciadores utilizados em diferentes marcas comerciais de resinas compostas em função da cor analisada. Foram utilizadas as resinas compostas: Tetric Ceram A3 (TCA3); Tetric Ceram Translucent (TCT); Filtek Z250 A3 (FZA3); Filtek Z-250 Incisal (FZI); Pyramid Enamel A1 (PEA1); Piramyd Enamel Translucent (PET); Filtek Supreme A3E (FSA3) e Filtek Supreme GT (FSGT). Foram pesados 500mg de cada resina e dissolvidos em 1,0 ml de metanol. As amostras foram centrifugadas para acelerar a sedimentação das partículas inorgânicas. Foram pipetados 0,8 ml da solução sobrenadante que foi armazenada por 72 horas em estufa a 35º C para total evaporação do metanol. Após este período foi feita a ressuspensão com 0,5 ml de metanol e analisados por cromatografia líquida acoplado ao espectrômetro de massa (GC-MS). Os resultados foram comparados a soluções de canforoquinona pura, utilizada como padrão. O teste de T Student, significativo ao nível de 5%, comparou os resultados entre as cores de cada marca comercial. Observou-se menor quantidade de canforoquinona na cor incisal da resina Filtek Z-250 (FZI) quando comparada a cor A3 (FZA3). Por outro lado, as resinas Tetric Ceram e Filtek Supreme apresentaram quantidade de canforoquinona estatisticamente superior nas cores Incisais (TCT e FSGT). Na resina Pyramid Enamel foi encontrada canforoquinona apenas na cor A1 (PEA1), sendo que o fotoiniciador utilizado na cor Translucent não foi identificado. Baseado nos dados obtidos pode-se concluir que uma mesma marca comercial de resina composta pode apresentar diferenças na quantidade e no tipo de fotoiniciador utilizado.
The aim of this study was to identify and quantify the photoinitiators used in different brands of composite resins in function of shade analyzed. It was used the following materials: Tetric Ceram A3 (TCA3); Tetric Ceram Translucent (TCT); Filtek Z250 A3 (FZA3); Filtek Z-250 Incisal (FZI); Pyramid Enamel A1 (PEA1); Piramyd Enamel Translucent (PET); Filtek Supreme A3E (FSA3) e Filtek Supreme GT (FSGT). A small portion (500 mg) of each composite resin was dissolved in 1,0 ml of methanol. The samples were centrifuged to accelerate the inorganic fillers sedimentation. An aliquot (0,8 ml) was stored in vials for 72 hours at 35º C for complete methanol evaporation. After this period was added 0,5 ml of methanol and the samples were analyzed by gas-liquid chromatograph associated to mass spectrometer (GC-MS). The results were compared to pure camphorquinone solutions, used as standart. The results between shades of each commercial brand were compared by T Student test significant at 5%. It was noticed statistical difference in the quantity of camphorquinone between the shades of all tested brands. In Pyramid Enamel was found camphorquinone only in the A1 shade (PEA1). The photoinitiator used in Translucent shade was not identified. Based upon the scientific data presented in this study, it was concluded that the same composite resin brand can present differences in the quantity and type of photoinitiator used.
The aim of this study was to identify and quantify the photoinitiators used in different brands of composite resins in function of shade analyzed. It was used the following materials: Tetric Ceram A3 (TCA3); Tetric Ceram Translucent (TCT); Filtek Z250 A3 (FZA3); Filtek Z-250 Incisal (FZI); Pyramid Enamel A1 (PEA1); Piramyd Enamel Translucent (PET); Filtek Supreme A3E (FSA3) e Filtek Supreme GT (FSGT). A small portion (500 mg) of each composite resin was dissolved in 1,0 ml of methanol. The samples were centrifuged to accelerate the inorganic fillers sedimentation. An aliquot (0,8 ml) was stored in vials for 72 hours at 35º C for complete methanol evaporation. After this period was added 0,5 ml of methanol and the samples were analyzed by gas-liquid chromatograph associated to mass spectrometer (GC-MS). The results were compared to pure camphorquinone solutions, used as standart. The results between shades of each commercial brand were compared by T Student test significant at 5%. It was noticed statistical difference in the quantity of camphorquinone between the shades of all tested brands. In Pyramid Enamel was found camphorquinone only in the A1 shade (PEA1). The photoinitiator used in Translucent shade was not identified. Based upon the scientific data presented in this study, it was concluded that the same composite resin brand can present differences in the quantity and type of photoinitiator used.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Adesivos dentarios, Cromatografia a gás, Espectrometria de massa, Polimeros, Luz, Adesivos dentinários, Composite resins, Chromatography, Mass spetrum analysis
Como citar
ALVIM, Hugo Henriques. Análise dos fotoiniciadores presentes em resinas compostas em função da cor. 2005. 114 f. Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Odontologia, 2005.