Success rate of immediate nonfunctional loaded single-tooth implants: Immediate versus delayed implantation

dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, Fernando Salimon
dc.contributor.authorPontes, Ana Emilia Farias
dc.contributor.authorMarcantonio, Elcio
dc.contributor.authorPiattelli, Adriano
dc.contributor.authorNeto, Rodolfo Jorge Boeck
dc.contributor.authorMarcantonio, Elcio [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Ribeirao Preto
dc.contributor.institutionUniv G dAnnunzio
dc.contributor.institutionPrivate Practice
dc.contributor.institutionEduc Fdn Barretos FEB
dc.contributor.institutionFUNEC
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-30T18:32:01Z
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:45:30Z
dc.date.available2013-09-30T18:32:01Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:45:30Z
dc.date.issued2008-03-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the success rate of maxillary immediate nonfunctional single-tooth loaded implants used into fresh extraction sites (immediate placement condition) or healed ridge (delayed placement condition).Materials and Methods: Eighty-two dental implants were placed in the maxilla of 64 consecutive patients from Private practice office and from a specialization course in Implantology. Forty-six implants were inserted under immediate placement condition, and 36 were inserted under delayed placement condition. The criteria used to evaluate success rate were those previously described by Albrektsson and Zarb (Int J Prosthodont 1993;6: 95-105), and follow-up period ranged from 18.0 to 39.7 months.Results: Seventy-nine implants fulfilled the success rate criteria (96.3%). Moreover, differences concerning implantation condition were not significant (P = 0.33, Qui-square test): three of the failed implants were from immediate placement group (success rate of 93.5%), and none was from delayed placement group (success rate of 100.0%).Conclusion: In the present sample, no statistically significant differences were detected for immediate nonfunctional single-tooth loaded implants under immediate placement condition in comparison with those inserted under delayed placement condition; both protocols had high success rate in maxillary incisors, canines, and premolars areas.en
dc.description.affiliationUNESP, Fac Odontol, Dept Periodont, BR-14801903 Araraquara, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Ribeirao Preto, Univ Ribeirao Preto, Sch Dent, Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv G dAnnunzio, UNICH, Sch Dent, Chieti, Italy
dc.description.affiliationPrivate Practice, Araraquara, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationEduc Fdn Barretos FEB, Sch Dent, Barretos, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationFUNEC, Integrated Fac Santa Fe Sul, Sch Dent, Santa Fe Sul, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUNESP, Fac Odontol, Dept Periodont, BR-14801903 Araraquara, SP, Brazil
dc.format.extent109-117
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e318166cb84
dc.identifier.citationImplant Dentistry. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, v. 17, n. 1, p. 109-117, 2008.
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/ID.0b013e318166cb84
dc.identifier.issn1056-6163
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/16016
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000253916600014
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins
dc.relation.ispartofImplant Dentistry
dc.relation.ispartofjcr1.307
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,712
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectdental implantsen
dc.subjectimmediate loadingen
dc.subjectimmediate implantationen
dc.subjectsuccess rateen
dc.subjectosseointegrationen
dc.titleSuccess rate of immediate nonfunctional loaded single-tooth implants: Immediate versus delayed implantationen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.licensehttp://edmgr.ovid.com/spine/accounts/copyrightTransfer.pdf
dcterms.rightsHolderLippincott Williams & Wilkins
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-1294-2305[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-9660-4524[6]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquarapt
unesp.departmentDiagnóstico e Cirurgia - FOARpt

Arquivos

Licença do Pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição:
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição: