Interest In and Practices Related to Gynecologic Oncology among Members of the Brazilian Federation of Associations of Gynecology and Obstetrics Interesse e práticas relacionadas à oncologia ginecológica entre os membros da Federação Brasileira de Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia Arilto Eleutério da Silva Júnior1 Jesus Paula Carvalho2 Sophie Françoise Mauricette Derchain3 Angélica Nogueira Rodrigues4 Renato Moretti5 Eduardo Batista Cândido4 Ricardo dos Reis6 Aline Evangelista Santiago1 Agnaldo Lopes da Silva Filho1,4 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho,” Botucatu, SP, Brazil 2Department of Obstetrics, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil 3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, São Paulo, SP, Brazil 4Department of Gynecology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil 5Center of Oncology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil 6Department of Oncology Gynecology, Hospital de Amor de Barretos, Barretos, SP, Brazil Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2019;41:394–399. Address for correspondence Agnaldo Lopes da Silva Filho, PhD, Av. Prof Alfredo Balena, 190, 30130-100, Santa Efigênia, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil (e-mail: agnaldo.ufmg@gmail.com). Keywords ► gynecology ► women – diseases ► oncology ► cancer – surgery ► gynecologists ► obstetricians Abstract Objective The present study aims to obtain basic demographic information, the level of interest and of training in gynecology oncology among Brazilian obstetricians and gynecologists (OB-GYNs) to create a professional profile. Methods An online questionnaire was sent to 16,008 gynecologists affiliated to the Brazilian Federation of Associations of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FEBRASGO, in the Portuguese acronym). We considered gynecologists dedicated to gynecologic oncolo- gy (OB-GYNs ONCO) those who self-reported that > 50% of their daily practice consists in working with women’s cancer care. Results A total of 1,608 (10%) of 16,008 FEBRASGO members responded. The OB- GYNs are concentrated in the southern and southeastern states of Brazil. Gynecologic oncology was considered the 8th greatest area of interest in gynecology among the OB- GYNs. A total of 95 (5.9%) of the OB-GYNs were considered OB-GYNs ONCO. Obstetricians and gynecologists are actively engaged in cancer care: > 60% of them dedicate up to 25% of their daily practice to oncology. The role of the physicians in Agnaldo Lopes da Silva Filho's ORCID is https://orcid.org/0000- 0002-8486-7861. received April 11, 2019 accepted May 7, 2019 DOI https://doi.org/ 10.1055/s-0039-1692467. ISSN 0100-7203. Copyright © 2019 by Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Original Article THIEME 394 Introduction It is estimated that the occurrence of gynecological cancers in Brazil is of � 30,000 new cases per year. For 2018, 16,370 new cases of cervical cancer, 6,600 new cases of uterus cancer, and 6,150 newcases of ovarian tumors are expected.1 Prevention, early diagnosis, and treatment in the right time are fundamentals of optimal cancer care.2 In low- and middle-income countries, investments in preventive meas- ures are more cost-effective for cancer control. One-third to one-half of all cancer deaths could be avoided through prevention and early detection and treatment.3 There are � 28,280 obstetricians and gynecologists (OB- GYNs) inBrazil, and16,008of themareaffiliatedtotheBrazilian Federation of Associations of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FEBRASGO, in the Portuguese acronym [https://www. febrasgo.org.br/]). Obstetricians and gynecologists may act as primary care physicians and, occasionally, are the only physi- cians of the women.4 Obstetricians and gynecologists are integral in treatments forgynecological cancer,whichcomprise preventive measures, screening, diagnosis, and treatment, ranging from low- to high-complexity cases.5 Obstetricians and gynecologists usually receive some training in gynecologic oncology during the medical residence. screening and prevention, diagnosis, in the treatment of precancerous lesions, and in low complexity surgical procedures is notably high. Gynecologists dedicated to gynecologic oncology in Brazil have a heterogeneous, nonstandardized and short training period in gynecologic oncology. These professionals had a more significantly role in performing medium- and high-complexity operations compared with OB-GYNs (65.2% versus 34%, and 47.3% versus 8.4%, respectively). Conclusion The role of OB-GYNs and of OB-GYNs ONCO appears to be complemen- tary. Obstetricians and gynecologists actmore often in screening and prevention and in low-complexity surgical procedures, whereas OB-GYNs ONCO are more involved in highly complex cases. Strategies to raise standards in cancer training and to encourage the recognition of gynecologic oncology as a subspecialty should be adopted in Brazil. Resumo Objetivo Opresenteestudotemcomoobjetivoobter informaçõesdemográficasbásicas, o nível de interesse e de treinamento em ginecologia oncológica entre obstetras e ginecologistas (OB-GYNs) brasileiros para criar um perfil destes profissionais. Métodos Umquestionárioonline foi enviadoa16.008ginecologistasfiliados à Federação Brasileira de Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO). Nós consideramos ginecologistas dedicados à oncologia ginecológica (OB-GYNsONCO) aqueles que referiram atuar em > 50% de sua prática diária com o tratamento do câncer feminino. Resultados Um total de 1.608 (10%) dos 16.008 membros da FEBRASGO responde- ram ao questionário. Os OB-GYNs estão concentrados nos estados do sul e sudeste do Brasil. A oncologia ginecológica foi considerada a 8ª área de maior interesse em ginecologia entre os OB-GYNs. Um total de 95 (5,9%) dos OB-GYNs foram considerados ginecologistas dedicados à oncologia ginecológica (OB-GYNs ONCO). Obstetras e ginecologistas estão ativamente envolvidos no tratamento do câncer: > 60% deles dedicam até 25% de sua prática diária à oncologia. O papel dosmédicos na triagem e na prevenção, no diagnóstico, no tratamento de lesões pré-cancerosas e em procedi- mentos cirúrgicos de baixa complexidade é notavelmente alto. Ginecologistas dedi- cados à oncologia ginecológica no Brasil têm um período de treinamento em oncologia ginecológica heterogêneo, não padronizado e curto. Estes profissionais tiveram um papel mais significativo na realização de operações de média e alta complexidade em comparação com OB-GYNs (65,2% versus 34%, e 47,3% versus 8,4%, respectivamente). Conclusão Os papéis dos OB-GYN e dos OB-GYNs ONCO parecem ser complementa- res. Os OB-GYNs frequentemente atuam em triagem e prevenção e em procedimentos cirúrgicos de baixa complexidade, enquanto os OB-GYNs ONCO estão mais envolvidos em casos demais alta complexidade. Estratégias para elevar os padrões de treinamento em oncoginecologia e incentivar o reconhecimento da oncologia ginecológica como uma subespecialidade devem ser adotadas no Brasil. Descritores ► ginecologia ► mulheres – doenças ► oncologia ► câncer – cirurgia ► ginecologistas ► obstetras Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Vol. 41 No. 6/2019 Interest In and Practices Related to Gynecologic Oncology da Silva Júnior et al. 395 It is well established that outcomes of gynecologic cancer patients are better when treated by appropriately trained gynecologic oncologists (OB-GYNs ONCO).6–10However, this subspecialty is not recognized in Brazil, and general sur- geons, oncology surgeons, and OB-GYNs are currently the specialists responsible for gynecologic cancer surgeries. Nei- ther surgical nor gynecologic societies can certify professio- nals who dedicate themselves to gynecologic cancer treatment, hampering gynecologic oncology training in the country.11 There is nodata regardingwhoare theOB-GYNs involved in women’s cancer care inBrazil or thosewhoaremorededicated to gynecologic oncology. Therefore, the present study aims to obtainbasicdemographic information, the level of interest and of training in gynecologic oncology among OB-GYNs. A profile of these professionals may help in the improvement of the oncological attention in our country. Methods After obtaining approval from the Institutional Review Board (number 2.447.492) and from the Brazilian FEBRASGO, we obtained a full mailing list of all of the FEBRASGOmembers. A questionnaire was developed to collect demographic data from Brazilian OB-GYNs of all of the regions of the country. The emails were sent to 16,008 OB-GYNs on October 19, 2016. The questionnaire was made available through a free survey Web site (SurveyMonkey [SurveyMonkey, San Mateo, CA, USA]), and the answerswere received via internet between October 19, 2016 andNovember 21, 2016. The survey included 28 separate questions, and it took � 15 minutes to complete. The respondents were asked about demographic character- istics, including their currentpractice setting,personal training history, experience with minimally invasive procedures, and their ability to perform complex surgical procedures. The collected data were kept confidential, and the identities of the interviewees were omitted and preserved anonymously. All of the collected data was stored by the FEBRASGO and shared with the authors. We considered OB-GYNs ONCO those OB-GYNs who self- reported that > 50% of their daily practice consisted in work- ing with women’s cancer care. The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical practice in gynecologic oncology proce- dures; therefore, diagnostic laparoscopy and hysteroscopy were considered low-complexity procedures. Medium-com- plexity procedures included unilateral/bilateral salpingo-oo- phorectomy, unilateral/bilateral ovarian cystectomy, and hysterectomy with or without unilateral/bilateral salpingo- oophorectomy. High-complexity procedures included radical hysterectomy, pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy, splenectomy, small bowel/colon resection, peritonectomy, hepatectomy, and diaphragm stripping.12 Statistical Analysis The data collected were analyzed using frequency distribu- tions tests; all of the unknown or missing responses were removed from the analysis. All of the statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results There were 1,608 OB-GYNs willing to respond to the ques- tionnaire; 10% of FEBRASGO members answered the ques- tions. A fully completed questionnaire was sent back by 1,272 (70%) OB-GYNs. All of the answers received were included in the present analysis. Gynecology oncologywas considered only the 8th greatest area of interest in gynecology among the OB-GYNs (►Fig. 1). In reporting the percentage of daily clinical practice dedicat- ed to women’s cancer care, 78.5% of the respondents did not treat any case of cancer or did it in < 25% of their daily practice in the previous 12 months (►Fig. 2). More than 60% of the OB-GYNs dedicated up to 25% of their daily practice to oncology. A total of 95 (5.9%) of the OB-GYNs self-reported that > 50% of their daily practice consisted in working with women’s cancer care and were considered OB-GYNs ONCO. As illustrated in ►Fig. 3, both OB-GYNs and OB-GYNs ONCO are concentrated in the southern and southeastern Fig. 1 Major areas of interest in gynecology among obstetricians and gynecologysts in Brazil (1,606 respondents). Fig. 2 Percentageof thedailyclinicalpracticededicatedtowomen’s cancer care among obstetricians and gynecologysts in Brazil(1,493 respondents). Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Vol. 41 No. 6/2019 Interest In and Practices Related to Gynecologic Oncology da Silva Júnior et al.396 states of the country. These professionals are also concen- trated in larger cities; 42.8% of the OB-GYNs and 54.7% of the OB-GYNs ONCO work in cities with > 1 million inhabitants. The majority of the OB-GYNs and OB-GYNs ONCO were board-certified by FEBRASGO in gynecology and obstetrics (66% and 68.4%, respectively). Regarding the gynecologic oncology training of OB-GYNs ONCO, 76.8% had performed a residence program, and 60% of them had specialization courses in gynecology oncology. A total of 29 (30.5%) of the OB-GYNs ONCO have master’s, doctoral and/or postdoctoral degrees. Finally, 11.5% had been trained in a foreign country in gynecologiconcology for at least 3months. The length of training ingynecologyoncologywas� 24 months in 49.4% of the OB-GYNs ONCO. Less than half (48.5%) of the OB-GYNs ONCO performed minimally invasive surgeries. Only 17.9% of themperformed laparoscopyor robot- ics in > 30% of the surgical cases. A high percentage of the OB- GYNs ONCO (76.8%) are affiliated to at least one Gynecology Oncology Society, such as the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO), theEuropeanSocietyofGynecologicalOncology (ESGO), and the International Gynecologic Cancer Society (IGCS). A large percentage (45.2%) of the OB-GYNs ONCO still practices obstetrics. Only 46.3% of these physicians had > 30 gynecological cancer surgeries per year, and 25% of them had between 6 and 30 cases in the previous 12months. Only 47.3% of them self-reported that they were able to perform high complexity procedures. ►Figs. 4 and 5 illustrate the compari- son between the roles of OB-GYNs and of OB-GYNs ONCO in women’s cancer care. Both groups had broad action in preven- tion, screening, treatment of precursor lesions, and in low- complexity surgical procedures. Gynecologic oncologists had a significantly higher role in the diagnosis of cancer and in the treatmentofprecursorlesionscomparedwithgeneralOB-GYNs (p ¼ 0.039 and p < 0.001, respectively). Regarding oncological surgeries,OB-GYNsONCOperformedmore low-,medium-, and high-complexity procedures compared with general OB-GYNs (p < 0.001). The greatest difference between the groups was in the rate of medium- and high-complexity operations (34% versus 65.2%, and 8.4% versus 47.3%, respectively) (►Fig. 5). Discussion The distribution of the OB-GYNs in the five regions of Brazil shows a concentration of these professionals in southeast Fig. 3 Distribution of the obstetricians and gynecologysts in different regions of Brazil. (1,608 respondents). Note: OB-GYNs: obstetricians and gynecologists. OB-GYNs ONCO: OB-GYNs who self-reported that > than 50% of their daily practice consists in working with women’s cancer. (Distribution of OB-GYNs ONCO by region: South: 11; Southeast: 55; North: 4; Midwest: 8; Northeast: 17). Fig. 4 ComparisonbetweenOB-GYNs andOB-GYNsONCO regarding their role in screening/prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of precursor lesions. Note: OB-GYNs: obstetricians and gynecologists. OB-GYNs ONCO: OB-GYNs who self-reported that > 50% of their daily practice consists in workingwithwomen’s cancer. Differencesbetweengroupswere calculated using the chi-squared test (1,598 respondents). Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Vol. 41 No. 6/2019 Interest In and Practices Related to Gynecologic Oncology da Silva Júnior et al. 397 and south regions, and a deficit in the northeast and north regions. Another study has shown that the distribution of physicians in municipalities grouped by population strata brings a new dimension to the same problem.13 The 39 cities with > 500 thousand inhabitants concentrate 30% of the population and 60% of all physicians in the country. When women with gynecological cancers are treated by OB-GYNs ONCO in referral cancer centers, they are able to live longer andwith a better quality of life.6,8,10,14 Therefore, ideally, the patients should be referred to high-volume physicians/hos- pitals to increase their life expectancy and quality of life.6,7,9 The adoption of strategies for creating centers specialized in gynecologic oncology for the referral of women with cancer in Brazil should be encouraged.9 Paradoxically, OB-GYNs demonstrated little interest in gynecologic oncology, which was in contrast with the in- volvement of the board in women’s cancer care. Almost 95% of the OB-GYNs are involved in prevention, screening, diag- nosis and treatment, and > 60% of these physicians dedicate up to 25% of their daily practice to issues related to oncology. Obstetricians and gynecologists usually receive some train- ing in gynecologic oncology during medical residence, but this training usually takes a only fewweeks of the program, is not homogeneous, and is probably insufficient to provide adequate preparation to care for women with gynecological cancer.9,15,16 As OB-GYNs are often the initial point of contact for patients, and as they also may make referrals, a better curriculumassociatedwith a longer and higher quality cancer prevention, screening and surgical training program during residency should be a strategy to improve the knowl- edge and abilities of OB-GYNs in gynecologic oncology. According to the definition of the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology, an OB-GYN ONCO is “a specialist in obstetrics and gynecology who is prepared to provide consultation on comprehensive management of patients with gynecologic cancer and who works in an institutional setting wherein all the effective forms of cancer therapy are available.”6 The present study showed that OB-GYNs ONCO care for a low volume of cancer cases, and a large number of them continue to work with obstetrics. These facts suggest a nonintegral dedication to women’s cancer care, which may reflect negatively in the treatment outcomes. It has been demonstrated that specialized physicians who work in mul- tidisciplinary teams to treat women with gynecological cancers are able to obtain the best clinical and oncological outcomes.6–8,10 Gynecologic oncologists have an essential role when treat- ing women with gynecological cancer.10 Our study showed that the OB-GYNs ONCO in Brazil have a heterogeneous, non- standardized, and short training period in gynecologic oncol- ogy. The nonrecognition of gynecologic oncology as a medical subspecialty represents a huge barrier to the complementary training of these professionals.9 In high-income countries, physicians who want to be gynecologic oncologists need to undergo a long and specific period of training and educa- tion.6,16,17 After finishing 4- to 5-year residency-training programs in obstetrics and gynecology, these professionals need more 2 to 4 years completing a specific fellowship- training program in gynecologic oncology.6 The training, skills, and knowledge base required of an OB- GYNONCO are rapidly expanding.10 The results of the present study showed a low rate of minimally invasive surgery, and only 47.3% of the OB-GYNs ONCO were able to perform high- complexityoncological procedures. Thesefindings suggest the absence of standardized training. Because the training of these professionals is highly diverse, one of the ways to equate quality of care is through the standardization of formal pro- grams of specialization. These programs should be focused in gynecologic oncology with consistent qualification of profes- sionals, such as multidisciplinary tumor boards, treatment guidelines tailored to local needs, tumor registries, clinical research, screening, and palliative programs.6,15 The present study has several limitations. The study is based on physician self-reports of involvement in cancer care. The results may not represent the views of the entire community of OB-GYNs ONCO because clinical oncologists, general surgeons, and oncologist surgeons were not includ- ed. It is possible that the participating physicians have more cancer care involvement than physicians who were not willing to answer the survey. Recall bias may also have been present. Members may not have accurately recalled the number and the percentage of procedures performed. However, to the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to create a profile of the OB-GYNs involved in women’s cancer care in Brazil. The role of OB-GYNs and of cancer specialists in cancer care appears to be complemen- tary. Obstetricians and gynecologists act more often in screening, in prevention, and in low-complexity surgical procedures, whereas OB-GYNs ONCO are more involved in high-complexity cases, especially those requiring surgical treatment. Efforts should focus on the training of OB-GYNs in gynecologic oncology during medical residency and recruit- ment, on specialized training in gynecologic oncology, and on the use of specialists in gynecologic oncology for the treatment of high-complexity cases.15 Fig. 5 Comparison between OB-GYNs (A) and OB-GYNs ONCO (B) regarding the complexity of oncological surgeries performed in the clinical practice. Note: OB-GYNs: obstetricians and gynecologists. OB-GYNs ONCO: OB-GYNs who self-reported that > 50% of their daily practice consists in working with women’s cancer (1,558 respondents). Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Vol. 41 No. 6/2019 Interest In and Practices Related to Gynecologic Oncology da Silva Júnior et al.398 Conclusion These strategies should be supported by policies to organize the health system, to refer high-complexity patients to specialized centers, and to invest in cancer registries, patient navigators, social workers, or other personnel to help patients coordinate their care and relieve their health-relat- ed burden. Strategies should be adopted to successfully raise standards in cancer training and to encourage the recogni- tion of gynecologic oncology as a subspecialty in Brazil. Contributors All of the authors contributed with the project and the interpretation of the data, with the writing of the article, the critical reviewof the intellectual content, andwith the final approval of the version to be published. Conflicts of Interests The authors have no conflicts of interests to declare. References 1 Ministério da Saúde. Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva. Coordenação de Prevenção e Vigilância. Estimativa 2018: Incidência de Câncer no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: INCA; 2018 2 Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CACancer J Clin 2011;61(02):69–90.Doi: 10.3322/ caac.20107 3 del CarmenMG, Rice LW, Schmeler KM. Global health perspective on gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol 2015;137(02):329–334. Doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.03.009 4 ColemanVH, LaubeDW,HaleRW,WilliamsSB,PowerML, Schulkin J. Obstetrician-gynecologists and primary care: trainingduringobste- trics-gynecology residencyand current practice patterns. AcadMed 2007;82(06):602–607. Doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3180556885 5 Teixeira LA. From gynaecology offices to screening campaigns: a brief history of cervical cancer prevention in Brazil. Hist Cienc Saude Manguinhos 2015;22(01):221–239. Doi: 10.1590/S0104- 59702015000100013 6 Minig L, Padilla-Iserte P, Zorrero C. The relevance of gynecologic oncologists to provide high-quality of care to women with gyne- cological cancer. Front Oncol 2016;5:308. Doi: 10.3389/ fonc.2015.00308 7 Dahm-Kähler P, Palmqvist C, Staf C, Holmberg E, Johannesson L. Centralized primary care of advanced ovarian cancer improves complete cytoreduction and survival - A population-based cohort study. Gynecol Oncol 2016;142(02):211–216. Doi: 10.1016/j. ygyno.2016.05.025 8 Aletti GD, Cliby WA. Time for centralizing patients with ovarian cancer: what are we waiting for? Gynecol Oncol 2016;142(02): 209–210. Doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.07.004 9 da Silva FilhoAL, Carvalho JP. [Oncologic Gynecologyas the Area of Activity]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2016;38(01):1–3. Doi: 10.1055/ s-0035-1570106 10 Reade C, Elit L. Trends in gynecologic cancer care in North America. ObstetGynecol ClinNorthAm2012;39(02):107–129.Doi: 10.1016/ j.ogc.2012.02.003 11 Johnston C, Ng JS, Manchanda R, Tsunoda AT, Chuang L. Variations in gynecologic oncology training in low (LIC) and middle income (MIC) countries (LMICs): Common efforts and challenges. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2017;20:9–14. Doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2017.01.003 12 Nick AM, Schmeler KM, Frumovitz MM, et al. Risk of thromboem- bolic disease in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116(04):956–961. Doi: 10.1097/ AOG.0b013e3181f240f7 13 Scheffer M, Biancarelli A, Cassenote A. Demografia Médica no Brasil 2015. São Paulo: Departamento de Medicina Preventiva da Faculdade deMedicina da USP/Conselho Regional deMedicina do Estado de São Paulo/Conselho Federal de Medicina; 2015 http:// www.usp.br/agen/wp-content/uploads/DemografiaMedica30- nov2015.pdf 14 Plotti F, Capriglione S, Miranda A, et al. The impact of gynecologic oncology training in the management of cancer patients: is it really necessary? A prospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2015;184:19–23. Doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.11.015 15 Heitz JW. The role of professional medical education societies in fostering professional identity. Acad Med 2015;90(08): 1002–1003. Doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000782 16 Padilla-Iserte P, Minig L, Zapardiel I, Chiva L, Laky R, de Santiago J. Current situation in gynecological oncology training in Spain: wherewe are andwherewewant to go. ClinTransl Oncol 2018;20 (04):517–523. Doi: 10.1007/s12094-017-1744-9 17 AveretteHE,WrennickA, AngioliR.Historyofgynecologic oncology subspecialty. Surg Clin North Am 2001;81(04):747–751. Doi: 10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70162-6 Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Vol. 41 No. 6/2019 Interest In and Practices Related to Gynecologic Oncology da Silva Júnior et al. 399