Review J. Braz. Chem. Soc., Vol. 30, No. 7, 1341-1349, 2019 Printed in Brazil - ©2019 Sociedade Brasileira de Química http://dx.doi.org/10.21577/0103-5053.20190055 *e-mail: eduardo.codaro@unesp.br Films Formed on Carbon Steel in Sweet Environments - A Review Igor A. Fioravante,a Ronaldo S. Nunes,a Heloisa A. Acciaria and Eduardo N. Codaro *,a aFaculdade de Engenharia, Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), 12516-410 Guaratinguetá-SP, Brazil Corrosion of carbon steel pipelines in sweet environments has been extensively researched on oil and natural gas exploration and production in order to obtain efficient corrosion mitigation methods. Although the consequences of corrosion are known, the cause and mechanism by which a certain phenomenon occurs are still not well understood. Sweet corrosion is mainly caused by the carbon dioxide dissolved in the water contained in the oil. It can manifest itself in different ways and one of which is the formation of a scale on the inner walls of the pipelines, which determines the evolution of corrosion process. This paper discusses the effects of partial pressure of carbon dioxide, dissolved hydrogen sulfide, dissolved oxygen and water chemistry on scale formation. Particular attention is paid to the nature and stability of the aqueous species formed during the corrosion process, as well as the thermodynamic and kinetic aspects lead to the scale formation on the carbon steel surface. The main objective is to enhance the understanding of the conditions of formation and precipitation of siderite and mackinawite and their effects on corrosion processes involving low carbon steels. Keywords: sweet corrosion, siderite, mackinawite, low carbon steels, carbon dioxide 1. Introduction Corrosion has been a matter of concern for the oil and natural gas exploration and production industries due to pipes repair and replacement costs. These costs tend to increase as more hostile environments are found and high performance specifications are needed. Low carbon steels are the most commonly used materials because these are readily available in the market and can meet many of the mechanical, manufacturing and cost requirements.1-3 Despite these advantages, carbon steels have relatively low corrosion resistance and require qualification for use in environments containing carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide and brine.4-6 Corrosion occurs in several different ways, but two types are characteristic of these industries, sweet and sour corrosion. The former is the most frequent type and occurs in oils containing carbon dioxide at very high partial pressures. The latter type occurs in more acid oils containing hydrogen sulfide at partial pressures generally higher than 0.003 atm.7 There is no consensus about what partial pressures ratio of (pCO2 / pH2S) determines one or other type of corrosion, but ratios higher than 500 or lower than 20 appear to better classify sweet corrosion or sour corrosion, respectively.8-14 Once there is carbon dioxide and brine in oil, it becomes a very aggressive environment that leads to the corrosion of the pipelines. When the inside walls of a pipeline suffer from corrosion, steel may lose its mechanical properties, which might lead to a catastrophic failure, causing huge losses.3,8,15 Pipelines can suffer localized or generalized attack, depending on carbon steel, oil and operating conditions such as pressure, temperature and fluid dynamics. Localized corrosion arises from the existence of galvanic pairs formed between the predominant phase (e.g., ferritic phase) and the nonmetallic (e.g., MnS) or intermetallic (e.g., Fe3C) inclusions,16 and it commonly manifests as pitting or mesa attack.17,18 Generalized corrosion is a consequence of preferential dissolution of the predominant phase and it can be manifested by the formation of a mixed scale consisting principally of iron carbonate and cementite.10,19,20 The structure of this scale plays an important role on the formation and mechanical stability of carbonate film. When carbon steel has sufficient carbon content to form a uniform distribution of cementite, it can develop a porous cementite layer on the carbon steel surface that provides an integrated structure to anchor and improve carbonate film adhesion.11,21 Variations in the fluid flow rate and/or fluid regime can change the type of attack, since the erosion caused by it can partially or totally remove the scale formed.22,23 Although corrosion consequences are known, causes and mechanisms by which Films Formed on Carbon Steel in Sweet Environments - A Review Igor A. Fioravante,a Ronaldo S. Nunes,a Heloisa A. Acciaria and Eduardo N. Codaro *,a https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1648-2281 Films Formed on Carbon Steel in Sweet Environments - A Review J. Braz. Chem. Soc.1342 each phenomenon occurs are still not well understood. There are four contributing factors to this situation, which are: varying chemical compositions of oil and produced water according to their deposits, wide range of operating conditions during oil extraction and transfer, limitations of laboratories to reproduce the actual internal conditions of pipelines, and a correlation of multiple parameters that influence corrosion. Many experts of oil companies have studied the corrosive processes of carbon steels in sweet environments. Their hands-on experience combined with scientific research allowed discerning which corrosion products were somehow formed during oil extraction and production operations. Generally, a carbon steel pipeline contains a relatively continuous layer of iron oxides and oxyhydroxides (hematite Fe2O3, magnetite Fe3O4, lepidocrocyte γ-FeOOH, and goethite α-FeOOH) formed spontaneously in air,11 which is not removed before installation.24,25 As oil passes, CO2 and H2S can react with these compounds to form carbonates, monosulfides and polysulfides. The chemical composition of corrosion products will depend on the pCO2 / pH2S ratio, oxygen contamination level and temperature.9,26,27 Researches, using different corrosion techniques in aqueous media, have made a significant contribution in this sense. Artificial sea water and other saline solutions containing different concentrations of carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide have often been used as corrosive media, probably due to these media having a similar chemical composition to emulsified water in oil.28,29 However, results obtained at relatively short exposure times at room temperature have led to one or two types of corrosion products, siderite or siderite plus mackinawite.11 Since the composition and physicochemical characteristics of corrosion products determine the evolution of corrosion process, the present work aims to broaden understanding about the conditions of formation and precipitation of siderite and mackinawite and their effects on corrosion processes involving low carbon steels. 2. Discussion 2.1. Carbon dioxide in aqueous solution Carbon dioxide (CO2(g)) is a relatively water-soluble gas at room temperature (equation 1). When it is dissolved, it forms a very weak diprotic acid, also known as carbonic acid (equation 2). In literature, there are multiple dissociation constants for this acid (Ka1 and Ka2), particularly for the second dissociation which involves very low concentrations of ionic species. In this study, intermediate values for Ka1 and Ka2 were used to calculate the equilibrium concentrations (equations 3 to 4).30 CO2(g)  CO2(aq) KH = 3.4 × 10-2 mol L-1 atm-1 (1) CO2(aq) + H2O(l)  H2CO3(aq) Kh = 2.6 × 10-3 (2) H2CO3(aq)  H+ (aq) + HCO3 − (aq) Ka1 = 4.5 × 10-7 (3) HCO3 − (aq)  H+ (aq) + CO3 2− (aq) Ka2 = 4.7 × 10-11 (4) Given the low values of these constants and a broad difference between them, the pH of an aqueous solution can be determined by the first dissociation. Since the analytical concentration of CO2 is higher than its effective concentration, it is more appropriate to write an equilibrium expression involving the partial pressure of CO2 (pCO2). Although Henry’s law is strictly aimed at gases that do not interact with the solvent, it is fulfilled for relatively low pCO2 values and ambient temperature.31 From Henry’s law expression for CO2 in water, it is possible to obtain an equation relating pH and pCO2 (equation 5). pH = 3.91 – 0.50 log pCO2 (5) Figure 1 shows a graphical representation of equation 5. It reveals two characteristics of aqueous solutions of this gas: (i) saturated solutions are slightly acidic at ordinary pressures; (ii) to increase pH by one unit, it is necessary to decrease pCO2 by two orders of magnitude. In Figure 1, two additional dashed lines divide the graph into three regions and each one is formed by different pH and pCO2 conditions. Regions 1, 2 and 3 were determined empirically and represent, respectively, low, medium and high corrosivity sweet environments for low-alloy carbon steels. For a given pCO2, pH mainly varies according to the relative concentration of formic and acetic acids present in produced water.32,33 This is one of the reasons why water chemistry can be a major contributor to pipeline corrosion. Figure 1. Effect of pCO2 on pH at 25 °C. Fioravante et al. 1343Vol. 30, No. 7, 2019 If the solution pH is changed at constant pCO2 and temperature, equilibrium will be disturbed and a new carbon species ratio will be established. The relation between carbon-containing species and pH can be calculated from the mass balance equations. Figure 2 shows H2CO3(aq), HCO3 − (aq) and CO3 2− (aq) fractional concentrations as a function of pH at 25 °C. At pH < 4.0, CO2(aq) and H2CO3(aq) are the predominant species, mainly the first one, since the other one is less than 0.01%.34 For 6.3 < pH < 10.3, HCO3 − (aq) is the predominant species and at pH > 10.3, only HCO3 − (aq) and CO3 2− (aq) are important. It is worth mentioning that in acid solutions there are small concentrations of CO3 2− (aq) that are ready to react, but only the most insoluble carbonates can precipitate.35 In this figure the two regions of buffer efficiency corresponding to H2CO3(aq) / HCO3 − (aq) and HCO3 − (aq) / CO3 2− (aq) equilibria are indicated. Due to the first conjugate acid-base pair, it is expected that during corrosion of the carbon steel in acidic medium, the pH will increase until it reaches the first buffer pH range and then stabilizes. To maintain a constant pH value, carbon dioxide produces carbonic acid (equation 2). As this reaction must cause the diffusion of the dissolved carbon dioxide from the oil to the aqueous phase,36,37 the capacity of the buffer must remain unchanged. In the Pourbaix diagram of Figure 3 are indicated the stability regions of species containing organic and inorganic carbon as a function of electrode potential and pH.38 The organic carbon was represented by formic acid which is often found in oil and in the produced water in a greater proportion than other organic acids.32,33 Vertical lines correspond to different acid-base equilibria. The pH values for these equilibria were calculated from the pK of formic and carbonic acids. Two dotted lines were added to the diagram in order to indicate the water stability region. The species within this region do not react with H2O, whilst those outside are able to do so. Therefore, it is verified that H2CO3(aq), HCO3 − (aq) and CO3 2− (aq) are stable in aqueous solutions throughout the pH range, while HCO2H(aq) and HCO2 − (aq) are unstable throughout the pH range, both in the presence and absence of oxygen. This suggests that the dissolved formic acid in oil can act as a carbonic acid source increasing the buffer capacity as the corrosion reaction proceeds. 2.2. Iron in aqueous solution Figure 4 illustrates simplified Pourbaix diagrams for the Fe-H2O system at 25 ºC, which show stability regions of the different species involved.30 These were constructed from possible chemical and electrochemical reactions associated with iron in wet or aqueous conditions, except for those that generate products with insufficient information, such as oxyanions. Since Fe2+ (aq) is the initial product of acid corrosion, its concentration was considered 100 times higher than the Fe3+ (aq) concentration. The latter Figure 2. Carbon-containing species as a function of pH. Figure 3. Simplified Pourbaix diagram for the C-H2O system at 25 ºC. Figure 4. Simplified Pourbaix diagram for the Fe-H2O system at 25 °C with passivity domain formed by Fe(OH)2(s), Fe3O4(s) and FeOOH(s). Films Formed on Carbon Steel in Sweet Environments - A Review J. Braz. Chem. Soc.1344 was set at 10-6 mol L-1, i.e., often found for mineral acids. Its two dotted lines enclose the water stability region and a corrosion reaction can occur as Fe2+ (aq) / Fe(s) reduction potential is below one of these lines. According to the diagrams, it should be noted that iron may be oxidized throughout this pH range, but the oxidation product will depend on the oxidizing agent. At pH < 8.4, the anodic reaction product is Fe2+ (aq) (shorthand notations for [Fe(H2O)6]2+ or [FeOH]+), and Fe(OH)2(s) and Fe3O4(s) for 8.4 ≤ pH ≤ 14. It is worth mentioning that Fe(OH)2(s) is not necessarily a precursor of Fe3O4(s), the latter can also be formed at lower pH values. In the presence of oxygen, the medium becomes more oxidizing and FeII-containing species can be oxidized into Fe3+ (aq) (shorthand notations for [Fe(H2O)6]3+ or [FeOH]2+) and FeOOH(s), depending on the pH value. Three domains can be differentiated through these diagrams: corrosion (composed of iron cations), immunity (consisting of pure iron) and passivity (consisting in a film that supposedly protects iron). These regions represent theoretical conditions in which corrosion may, cannot and does not occur, respectively. In practice, a source of oxygen contamination is from manipulating the fluids used in the secondary and tertiary oil recovery. This is a serious problem, since the depolarizing action of oxygen can increase the corrosion rate of low carbon steel by up to two orders of magnitude.28,29 If produced water is used in oil recovery, the concentration of dissolved oxygen greatly depends on salinity.32,33 When it is low, the most frequently found corrosion products in pipelines are α-FeOOH, β-FeOOH and γ-FeOOH, otherwise α-Fe2O3 is the main product.9,39 2.3. Iron in carbon dioxide solution When iron is exposed to a carbon dioxide solution, a corrosion reaction occurs whose consequence may be carbonate precipitation. As the concentration of ionic species in this medium is directly linked to pH, the possibility of whether carbonate will precipitate or not also depends on pH. There are different expressions in literature that determine the solubility equilibrium and several constants for these equilibria.34,40 In this study, it was used expressions of solubility products of Fe(OH)2 and FeCO3 (siderite) at 25 °C described by equations 6 and 7, respectively. (6) (7) By rearranging the equations 6 and 7, it is possible to obtain the equations 8 and 9, which can clarify the influence of pH on solubility equilibria. log[Fe2+] = 12.8 – 2pH (8) log[Fe2+] = 5.93 – log pCO2 – 2pH (9) The influence of pH on the FeCO3 and Fe(OH)2 solubilities is shown in Figure 5. One additional line was plotted representing the solubility equilibrium of mackinawite (equation 10), which can be formed at very low pH2S.41,42 This sulfide is formed rapidly over a wide range of partial pressures and temperatures and is relatively stable in oxygen free acid medium.43 log[Fe2+] = 4.19 – log pH2S – 2pH (10) Each line divides the graph into two regions: the dissolution region on the left and the precipitation region on the right. It is evident that when pCO2 is increased, lower concentrations of Fe2+ (aq) are sufficient to precipitate FeCO3, and there is a pCO2 from which the concentration in equilibrium with FeCO3(s) is lower than that required to precipitate FeS. It can be deduced from equations 9 and 10 that when the pCO2 / pH2S ratio is more than 55, the corrosion may be considered sweet. FeCO3 precipitation will start when Fe2+ (aq) concentration and pH are the same as those in the line. Then, the ionic product [Fe2+][CO3 2− (aq)] value will be the same as that of Ksp,FeCO3. Since OH− (aq) and CO3 2− (aq) concentrations are defined according to Figure 2, the ionic product [Fe2+][OH−]2 is always less than [Fe2+][CO3 2−], and thus there is no precipitation of Fe(OH)2 in a sweet environment. If it is present before oil passes through the pipeline, Figure 5. pH influence on solubilities of FeCO3 (siderite), FeS (mackinawite) and Fe(OH)2 at 25 ºC. Fioravante et al. 1345Vol. 30, No. 7, 2019 it will react with carbon dioxide and form carbonate (equation 11).30 Fe(OH)2(s) + CO2(aq) → FeCO3(s) + H2O(l) ∆G0 = −38.98 kJ (11) Pourbaix diagrams of iron in the presence of CO2(aq) are shown in Figure 6. For constructing these diagrams, equations 9 and 12 were used to represent chemical equilibria. Nernst equations 13 and 14 were obtained using ∆Gf 0(FeCO3) = −680.0 kJ mol-1, ∆Gf 0(CO2) = −386.2 kJ mol-1 and ∆Gf 0(α-FeOOH) = −492.1 kJ mol-1.30 By comparing Figure 6 to Figure 4, it can be concluded that the former has a larger passivation domain due to carbonate formation. log[Fe3+] = –0.269 – 3pH (12) E(FeCO3/Fe) = –0.294 – 0.296 log pCO2 – 0.0591 pH (13) E(FeOOH/FeCO3) = 0.403 + 0.0591 log pCO2 – 0.0591 pH (14) Similar Pourbaix diagrams were constructed by other authors44 in the temperature range from 25 to 80 ºC. They had demonstrated that an increase in pCO2 or temperature favors the formation of carbonate, but film formation was observed only at temperatures higher than 55 oC.44-46 A more detailed analysis of Figure 6 reveals that for pCO2 = 3.0 atm and pH < 4.73, conditions are not favorable for siderite film formation (region 3 in Figure 1) and FeII soluble species are the most stable in the absence of oxygen. In this pH range, Fe2+ (aq) and HCO3 − (aq) are the predominant ionic species (Figure 7), which can react to form FeHCO3 + (aq) (Kf ca. 28). At higher pH, another stable complex can be formed FeCO3 0 (aq) (Kf ca. 50000),30 and both the former and the latter can shift the solubility equilibrium to higher pH values, favoring the dissolution of iron.47 The information in the literature on these complexes is very limited and there is no strong experimental evidence for the formation of FeII-carbonate complexes in acid medium, since the protonation of a carbonate ligand generally leads to a rapid release of carbon dioxide.48 At pH ≥ 4.73, iron is also oxidized and FeCO3 can precipitate and form a film. However, when the electrolyte is produced water, it is necessary to consider the effect of ionic strength on the solubility, since produced water is a solution of high salinity. The higher ionic strength of the medium, the lower effective concentration of Fe2+ (aq) and CO3 2− (aq), therefore FeCO3 precipitation will occur at higher pH values.32,33,49 When the pCO2 is increased, the passivation region increases and the corrosion region decreases as a consequence of smaller metal active area due to a protective film formation. However, due to the high concentration of species that can be reduced at low pH values (H+ (aq), CO2(aq) and H2CO3(aq)), the dissolution rate of iron is higher than the precipitation rate of carbonate, and thus the film formation does not occur.10,11,15 Researches confirm that carbonate precipitation does not occur at pH < 5.0 and corrosion of carbon steels is generalized at room temperature. Films formed between pH 5.0 and 6.0 are discontinuous or porous and those formed at pH > 6.0 are dense.10,11,44,50 In the presence of oxygen, the FeII-containing species can be oxidized to form Fe3+ (aq) or FeOOH(s) (equation 15), depending on the pH. 4 FeCO3(s) + O2(g) + 2 H2O(l) → 4 α-FeOOH(s) + 4 CO2(aq) ∆G0 = −318.8 kJ (15) Figure 6. Simplified Pourbaix diagrams for the Fe-H2O-CO2 system at 25 °C considering the effect of pCO2 on siderite formation. Figure 7. Distribution curves of carbon- and iron-containing species. Films Formed on Carbon Steel in Sweet Environments - A Review J. Braz. Chem. Soc.1346 2.4. Carbon steel corrosion When low carbon steel is exposed to a sweet environment, it is corroded and releases Fe2+ (aq) and H2(g). Secondary phases such as cementite or other carbides can act as cathodes, while the iron dissolution occurs in the ferrite and pearlite grains, for example. At pH < 4.0, iron has two major alternative routes for dissolution: in strongly acid medium, it occurs through adsorbed FeII-hydroxo species on the metal surface (equations 16, 17 and 18), and in moderately acid medium, it is promoted by intermediate FeII-bicarbonate species (equations 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 and 24). For each mechanism below, the rate-determining step (rds) is indicated.15,47,51 Fe(s) + H2O(l) → FeOH(ad) + H+ (aq) + e− (16) FeOH(ad) → FeOH+ (ad) + e− (rds) (17) FeOH+ (ad) + H+ (aq)  Fe2+ (aq) + H2O(l) (18) Fe(s) + CO2(aq)  FeCO2(ad) (19) FeCO2(ad) ) + H2O(l)  FeHCO3(ad) + H+ (aq) + e− (20) FeHCO3(ad)  FeHCO3 + (ad) + e− (21) FeHCO3 + (ad) + H2O(l)  FeOH2CO3(ad) + H+ (aq) (22) FeOH2CO3(ad)  FeOH2CO3(aq) (rds) (23) FeOH2CO3(aq) + 2 H+ (aq)  Fe2+ (aq) + CO2(aq) + 2 H2O(l) (24) Some authors52,53 indicate that the iron dissolution rate depends on the amount, distribution and morphology of the cementite phase.Others suggest that it depends mainly on the concentration of species that carbon dioxide produces at the metal/electrolyte interface47,54 Others argue that the cathodic reaction controls the corrosion reaction through a series of steps involving the reduction of H+ (aq) (equation 25) or H2CO3(ad) (equation 26) on the metal surface, this mechanism is known as direct reduction (equations 26, 27 and 28).11,19,47,55,56 H+ (aq) + e− → H(ad) (rds) (25) H2CO3(ad) + e− → HCO3 − (ad) + H(ad) (rds) (26) H2CO3(ad) + H(ad) + e− → HCO3 − (ad) + H2(g) (27) H(ad) + H(ad) → H2(g) (28) As pH increases, all equilibria involving the participation of H+ (aq) are shifted so that the concentration of other ions is altered (Figure 7). In the pH range of 5.3 to 6.3, the pH tends to maintain in a constant value due to the H2CO3(aq) / HCO3 − (aq) pair (Figure 2) and H+ (aq) is replenished as it is consumed in the cathodic reaction, this mechanism is known as buffering effect.47 In this pH range, conditions are favorable for the siderite formation, therefore, when the ionic product [Fe2+ (aq)][CO3 2− (aq)] exceeds the solubility limit, the precipitation can occur on the metal surface, and both pH and Fe2+ (aq) concentration must remain constant (Figure 5).15,57 FeCO3(s) formation is believed to occurs in a one-step reaction from its constituent ions (equation 29), but a two-step reaction involving a FeII-bicarbonate specie (equations 30 and 31) has also been suggested.21 Although FeCO3 precipitation is possible, the rate at which this phenomenon occurs is very slow at temperatures lower than 80 ºC and relatively long exposure times are required for the formation and growth of a film.10,31,58 Fe2+ (aq) + CO3 2− (aq) → FeCO3(s) (29) Fe2+ (aq) + 2 HCO3 − (aq) → Fe(HCO3)2(s) (30) Fe(HCO3)2(s) → FeCO3(s) + CO2(g) + 2 H2O(l) (31) At pH > 6.0, another cathodic reaction may participate in the mechanism (equations 32 or 33), but the presence of a film can determine the corrosion reaction control. In this sense, the siderite film may restrict or block the transport of species to and from the metal surface and thus decrease the corrosion rate.59 2 H2O(l) + 2 e− → 2 OH− (aq) + H2(g) (32) HCO3 − (aq) + e− → CO3 2− (aq) + H(ad) (33) In the presence of trace amounts of H2S(aq) (on the order of some ppm), a thin layer of mackinawite (<< 1.0 µm) is quickly formed, probably through a solid-state mechanism from adsorbed species (e.g., HS− (ad) or FeSH− (ad)) at the metal/ electrolyte interface.10,27,41,60-63 This is based on a certain similarity between unit cells of tetragonal mackinawite and the body-centered cubic ferritic structure of carbon steel.27,60 Due to its high electrical conductivity,64 H+ (aq), H2CO3(aq) or HCO3 − (aq) species can be reduced on the film surface, thus causing iron oxidation.65-68 The nucleation and growth of FeCO3(s) will occur if the local conditions at the film/ electrolyte interface favor the formation of this new phase. 3. Summary When low carbon steel is exposed to sweet environments, a corrosion process is initiated. Partial pressure of CO2(g) and water chemistry are two of the main contributors to this process. The corrosion can occurs through different mechanisms depending on the pH. In strongly acid medium, the iron dissolution mechanism involves adsorbed FeII-hydroxo species on the metal surface, which control the corrosion rate. In moderately acid medium, the mechanism involves intermediate FeII-bicarbonate species and its rate-determining step has not been well-established yet. In slightly acid or neutral media, siderite can precipitate, but the presence of complexing agents and the ionic Fioravante et al. 1347Vol. 30, No. 7, 2019 strength of the medium can determine at what pH value this phenomenon will occur. After the siderite nucleation, it is likely to grow through a dissolution-precipitation mechanism and the diffusion of the species to or from the metal surface may control the corrosion rate. If hydrogen sulfide was originally present, it would react quickly with iron to form mackinawite. When a layer is formed on the metal surface, the corrosion rate is diminished and the corrosion process continues until it is inhibited by formation of a siderite layer. In the absence of oxygen, other solid species such as oxides and oxyhydroxides of iron(III) must not be formed during sweet corrosion, but they can be present before oil passes through the pipeline or they can be formed due to the entry of oxygen into the pipeline during oil recovery operations. The degree of oxygen contamination will determine the relative proportions of these compounds in the corrosion products. Although these conclusions can enhance the understanding of sweet corrosion, there are still several unclear aspects that require more attention. It is well-known that carbonate precipitation does not occur at high partial pressures of CO2(g) and low pH values at room temperature, but what is the set of parameters really lead to formation of a protective carbonate film? What is the range of partial pressures of H2S(g) that decreases the corrosion rate by forming a sulfide film? How the native oxides and oxyhydroxides affect the formation and protectiveness of a sulfide or carbonate film? To what extent do the protective characteristics of these films change in the presence of small amounts of dissolved oxygen? Acknowledgments This work has been supported by the São Paulo Research Foundation (grant No. 2017/11361-5). Eduardo Norberto Codaro was born in Buenos Aires in Argentina in the early 1960s. He graduated in chemistry from the National University of La Plata (UNLP) and PhD in chemistry from the Institute of Theoretical and Applied Physical-Chemical Research (INIFTA-UNLP) in 1996. He has been a Professor of Chemistry in São Paulo State University (UNESP) in Brazil since 2003. He has published over 70 scientific papers (h-index 13) on chemical and electrochemical behavior of several metals and alloys in different aqueous media, but his main research interests are the thermodynamics and kinetics of sour and sweet corrosion of carbon steels. Heloisa Andréa Acciari is a bachelor in chemistry from the São Paulo University (1994), MSc in chemistry (1997) and PhD in Chemistry (2001), Post Doctoral researcher in biomaterial corrosion (2003), Post Doctoral researcher biohydrometallurgy processes (2008) at Institute of Chemistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP). She has been a professor of chemistry at School of Engineering, São Paulo State University (UNESP) since 2010. She is currently assistant professor at São Paulo State University (UNESP). Her main research interests are the ac and dc anodisation processes of titanium and its alloys. Ronaldo S. Nunes holds a bachelor’s degree in Chemistry (2001) from the Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar). In 2004, he obtained his MSc degree in analytical chemistry from the Institute of Chemistry of São Carlos, University of São Paulo (USP). In 2009, he received his PhD in analytical chemistry at the same institution. His main areas of research are thermal analysis of transition metal and lanthanide complexes and chemical equilibrium in aqueous solution. He is currently a full-time chemistry professor at the Engineering School, São Paulo State University (UNESP). Igor Alexandre Fioravante graduated in industrial production f rom the S ta t e Cen t e r f o r Technological Education Paula Souza in 2008 and master in product design from the Teresa D’Ávila University Center (UNIFATEA) in 2017. He is currently a PhD student researching the sweet corrosion of low alloy carbon steels at the São Paulo State University (UNESP). References 1. International Energy Agency (IEA); Resources to Reserves 2013 - Oil, Gas and Coal Technologies for the Energy Markets of the Future; IEA Publications: Paris, 2013. 2. Cao, S.; He, F.; Gao, J.; Anti-Corros. Methods Mater. 2017, 64, 465. Films Formed on Carbon Steel in Sweet Environments - A Review J. Braz. Chem. Soc.1348 3. Iannuzzi, M.; Barnoush, A.; Johnsen, R.; NPJ Mater. Degrad. 2017, 1, 2. 4. Tissot, B. P.; Welte, D. H.; Petroleum Formation and Occurrence, 2nd ed.; Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg, 1984. 5. ANSI/NACE, MR0175/ISO 15156-1:2015: Petroleum and Natural Gas Industries - Materials for Use in H2S-Containing Environments in Oil and Gas Production - Part 1: General Principles for Selection of Cracking-Resistant Materials; NACE International, The Corrosion Society: Houston, 2015. 6. ANSI/NACE, TM 0316-2016: Four-Point Bend Testing of Materials for Oil and Gas Applications; NACE International, The Corrosion Society: Houston, Texas, 2016. 7. ANSI/NACE, MR0175/ISO 15156-2:2015: Petroleum and Natural Gas Industries - Materials for Use in H2S-Containing Environments in Oil and Gas Production - Part 2: Cracking- Resistant Carbon and Low-Alloy Steels, and the Use of Cast Irons; NACE International, The Corrosion Society: Houston, Texas, 2015. 8. Smith, L.; Craig, B. In Corrosion NACexpo 2005 – 60th Annual Conference & Exposition; NACE International, The Corrosion Society: Houston, Texas, 2005 9. Craig, B.; Mater. Perform. 2002, 41, 56. 10. Singer, M.; Brown, B.; Camacho, A.; Nešić, S.; Corrosion 2011, 67, 015004-1. 11. Kermani, M. B.; Morshed, A.; Corrosion 2003, 59, 659. 12. Yin, Z. F.; Zhao, W. Z.; Bai, Z. Q.; Feng, Y. R.; Zhou, W. J.; Electrochim. Acta 2008, 53, 3690. 13. Perez, T. E.; JOM 2013, 65, 1033. 14. Smith, S. N.; Mater. Perform. 2015, 54, 2. 15. Dugstad, A. In Corrosion NACexpo 2006 - 61st Annual Conference & Exposition; NACE International, The Corrosion Society: San Diego, California, 2006. 16. Costa e Silva, A. L. V.; J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2018, 7, 283. 17. Papavinasam, S.; Doiron, A.; Revie, R. W.; Corrosion 2010, 66, 0350061. 18. Nyborg, R.; Dugstad, A. In Corrosion NACexpo 2003 - 58th Annual Conference; NACE International, The Corrosion Society: San Diego, California, 2003. 19. Popoola, L. T.; Grema, A. S.; Latinwo, G. K.; Gutti, B.; Balogun, A. S.; Int. J. Ind. Chem. 2013, 4, 35. 20. Eliyan, F. F.; Alfantazi, A.; Corros. Sci. 2014, 85, 380. 21. Barker, R.; Burkle, D.; Charpentier, T.; Thompson, H.; Neville, A.; Corros. Sci. 2018, 142, 312. 22. Nejad, A. M.; Anti-Corros. Methods Mater. 2018, 65, 73. 23. Islam, M. A.; Farhat, Z.; Wear 2017, 376-377, 533. 24. Silva, M. V. F.; Pereira, M. C.; Codaro, E. N.; Acciari, H. A.; Quim. Nova 2014, 38, 293. 25. Takahashi, Y.; Matsubara, E.; Suzuki, S.; Okamoto, Y.; Komatsu, T.; Konishi, H.; Mizuki, J.; Waseda, Y.; Mater. Trans. 2005, 46, 637. 26. Smith, S. N.; Mater. Perform. 2003, 42, 44. 27. Smith, S. N. In Corrosion NACexpo 2015 - Corrosion Conference & Exposition; NACE International, The Corrosion Society: Dallas, Texas, 2015. 28. ANSI/NACE, TM 0284-2011: Evaluation of Pipeline and Pressure Vessel Steels for Resistance to Hydrogen-Induced Cracking; NACE International, The Corrosion Society: Houston, Texas, 2011. 29. ANSI/NACE, TM 0177-96: Laboratory Testing of Metals for Resistance to Sulfide Stress Cracking and Stress Corrosion Cracking in H2S Environments; NACE International, The Corrosion Society: Houston, Texas, 1997. 30. Chivot, J.; Thermodynamique des Produits de Corrosion; Andra: Châtenay-Malabry, France, 2004. 31. Zhang, Y.; Pang, X.; Qu, S.; Li, X.; Gao, K.; Corros. Sci. 2012, 59, 186. 32. Neff, J.; Lee, K.; DeBlois, E. M. In Produced Water; Lee, K.; Neff, J., eds.; Springer: New York, 2011. 33. Utvik, T. I. R.; Chemosphere 1999, 39, 2593. 34. England, A. H.; Duffin, A. M.; Schwartz, C. P.; Uejio, J. S.; Prendergast, D.; Saykally, R. J.; Chem. Phys. Lett. 2011, 514, 187. 35. Skoog, D. A.; West, D. M.; Holler, F. J.; Crouch, S. R.; Fundamentals of Analytical Chemistry, 9th ed.; Cengage: Belmont, USA, 2014. 36. Barclay, T. H.; Mishra, S.; J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol. 2016, 6, 815. 37. Rostami, A.; Arabloo, M.; Kamari, A.; Mohammadi, A. H.; Fuel 2017, 210, 768. 38. Pourbaix, M.; Atlas of Electrochemical Equilibria in Aqueous Solutions, 2nd ed.; NACE International, The Corrosion Society: Houston, Texas, 1974. 39. Möller, H.; Boshoff, E. T.; Froneman, H.; J. South. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 2006, 106, 585. 40. Sun, W.; Nešić, S.; Young, D.; Woollam, R. C.; Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47, 1738. 41. Choi, Y.-S.; Nešić, S.; Ling, S.; Electrochim. Acta 2011, 56, 1752. 42. Ren, C.; Liu, D.; Bai, Z.; Li, T.; Mater. Chem. Phys. 2005, 93, 305. 43. Rickard, D.; Luther, G. W.; Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 514. 44. Tanupabrungsun, T.; Young, D.; Brown, B.; Nešić, S. In Corrosion NACexpo 2012 - Corrosion Conference & Exposition; NACE International, The Corrosion Society: Salt Lake City, Utah, 2011. 45. Nazari, M. H.; Allahkaram, S. R.; Kermani, M. B.; Mater. Des. 2010, 31, 3559. 46. Li, T.; Yang, Y.; Gao, K.; Lu, M.; J. Univ. Sci. Technol. Beijing 2008, 15, 702. 47. Kahyarian, A.; Singer, M.; Nešić, S.; J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2016, 29, 530. 48. Lemire, R. J.; Berner, U.; Musikas, C.; Palmer, D. A.; Taylor, P.; Tochiyama, O. In Chemical Thermodynamics of Iron Part 1; Fioravante et al. 1349Vol. 30, No. 7, 2019 Perrone, J., ed.; OECD Nuclear Energy Agency: Issy-les- Moulineaux, 2013. 49. Silva, C. A. R.; Liu, X.; Millero, F. J.; J. Solution Chem. 2002, 31, 97. 50. Joshi, G. R.; Cooper, K.; Zhong, X.; Cook, A. B.; Ahmad, E. A.; Harrison, N. M.; Engelberg, D. L.; Lindsay, R.; Corros. Sci. 2018, 142, 110. 51. Kahyarian, A.; Brown, B.; Nešić, S.; Corros. Sci. 2017, 129, 146. 52. Shibaeva, T. V.; Laurinavichyute, V. K.; Tsirlina, G. A.; Arsenkin, A. M.; Grigorovich, K. V.; Corros. Sci. 2014, 80, 299. 53. Ochoa, N.; Vega, C.; Pébère, N.; Lacaze, J.; Brito, J. L.; Mater. Chem. Phys. 2015, 156, 198. 54. Almeida, T. C.; Bandeira, M. C. E.; Moreira, R. M.; Mattos, O. R.; Corros. Sci. 2017, 120, 239. 55. Tanupabrungsun, T.; Brown, B.; Nešić, S. In Corrosion NACexpo 2013 - Corrosion Conference & Exposition; NACE International, The Corrosion Society: Orlando, Florida, 2013. 56. Yin, Z. F.; Feng, Y. R.; Zhao, W. Z.; Bai, Z. Q.; Lin, G. F.; Surf. Interface Anal. 2009, 41, 517. 57. Nagayassu, V. Y.; Panossian, Z.; Seckler, M. M.; Corros. Prot. Mater. 2015, 34, 42. 58. Gao, M.; Pang, X.; Gao, K.; Corros. Sci. 2011, 53, 557. 59. Nešić, S.; Corros. Sci. 2007, 49, 4308. 60. Wikjord, A. G.; Rummery, T. E.; Doern, F. E.; Owen, D. G.; Corros. Sci. 1980, 20, 651. 61. Sun, W.; Nešić, S. In Corrosion NACexpo 2007 - Corrosion Conference & Exposition, NACE International, The Corrosion Society: Nashville, Tennessee, 2007. 62. Abelev, E.; Sellberg, J.; Ramanarayanan, T. A.; Bernasek, S. L.; J. Mater. Sci. 2009, 44, 6167. 63. Bai, P.; Zhao, H.; Zheng, S.; Chen, C.; Corros. Sci. 2015, 93, 109. 64. Pearce, C. I.; Pattrick, R. A. D.; Vaughan, D. J.; Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 2006, 61, 127. 65. Videm, K.; Kvarekvål, J.; Corrosion 1995, 51, 260. 66. Wen, X.; Bai, P.; Luo, B.; Zheng, S.; Chen, C.; Corros. Sci. 2018, 139, 124. 67. de Oliveira, M. C.; de Lima, A. P.; Figueredo, R. M.; Acciari, H. A.; Codaro, E. N.; Quim. Nova 2018, 41, 594. 68. Kittel, J.; Ropital, F.; Grosjean, F.; Sutter, E. M. M.; Tribollet, B.; Corros. Sci. 2013, 66, 324. Submitted: February 11, 2019 Published online: April 8, 2019 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. OLE_LINK122 OLE_LINK137 OLE_LINK43 OLE_LINK118 OLE_LINK3 OLE_LINK15 OLE_LINK108 OLE_LINK114 OLE_LINK140 OLE_LINK105 OLE_LINK54 OLE_LINK111 OLE_LINK112 OLE_LINK113 OLE_LINK116 OLE_LINK131 OLE_LINK115 OLE_LINK138 OLE_LINK107 OLE_LINK110 OLE_LINK136 OLE_LINK106 OLE_LINK49 OLE_LINK117 OLE_LINK139 OLE_LINK51 OLE_LINK33 OLE_LINK52 OLE_LINK18 OLE_LINK135 OLE_LINK10 OLE_LINK212 OLE_LINK36 OLE_LINK85 OLE_LINK87 OLE_LINK57 OLE_LINK119 OLE_LINK59 OLE_LINK120 OLE_LINK20 OLE_LINK1 OLE_LINK4 OLE_LINK123 OLE_LINK142 OLE_LINK126 OLE_LINK109 OLE_LINK125 OLE_LINK13 OLE_LINK6 OLE_LINK16 OLE_LINK12 OLE_LINK17 OLE_LINK7 OLE_LINK24 OLE_LINK9 OLE_LINK25 OLE_LINK26 OLE_LINK37 OLE_LINK46 OLE_LINK44 OLE_LINK45 OLE_LINK14 OLE_LINK19 OLE_LINK22 OLE_LINK127 OLE_LINK129 OLE_LINK143 OLE_LINK146 OLE_LINK145 OLE_LINK2 OLE_LINK8 OLE_LINK28 OLE_LINK29 OLE_LINK214 OLE_LINK216 OLE_LINK224 OLE_LINK84 OLE_LINK5 OLE_LINK11 OLE_LINK34 OLE_LINK35 OLE_LINK31 OLE_LINK27 OLE_LINK148 OLE_LINK147 OLE_LINK61 OLE_LINK62 OLE_LINK71 OLE_LINK64 OLE_LINK63 OLE_LINK42 OLE_LINK99 OLE_LINK30 OLE_LINK23 OLE_LINK32 OLE_LINK79 OLE_LINK121 OLE_LINK141 OLE_LINK80 OLE_LINK39 OLE_LINK78 OLE_LINK41 OLE_LINK128 OLE_LINK48 OLE_LINK40 OLE_LINK81 OLE_LINK86 OLE_LINK88 OLE_LINK56 OLE_LINK50 OLE_LINK68 OLE_LINK47 OLE_LINK75 OLE_LINK72 OLE_LINK104 OLE_LINK95 OLE_LINK73 OLE_LINK55 OLE_LINK65 OLE_LINK69 OLE_LINK67 OLE_LINK70 OLE_LINK76 OLE_LINK66 OLE_LINK101 OLE_LINK58 OLE_LINK100 OLE_LINK74 OLE_LINK82 OLE_LINK77 OLE_LINK60 OLE_LINK89 OLE_LINK90 OLE_LINK130 OLE_LINK92 OLE_LINK83 OLE_LINK134 OLE_LINK133 OLE_LINK93 OLE_LINK97 OLE_LINK98 OLE_LINK103 OLE_LINK124 OLE_LINK96 OLE_LINK91 OLE_LINK94 OLE_LINK132 OLE_LINK102