Vol.:(0123456789)1 3 International Journal of Earth Sciences (2019) 108:89–113 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-018-1644-4 REVIEW ARTICLE Evolution of the Southwestern Angolan Margin: episodic burial and exhumation is more realistic than long-term denudation Bruno Venancio da Silva1  · Peter Christian Hackspacher1 · Marli Carina Siqueira Ribeiro1 · Ulrich Anton Glasmacher2 · Antonio Olimpio Gonçalves3 · Carolina Doranti‑Tiritan1 · Daniel Françoso de Godoy1 · Renata Regina Constantino1 Received: 18 January 2018 / Accepted: 3 August 2018 / Published online: 13 August 2018 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract There are two main points of view regarding how continental margins evolve. The first one argues that the present-day margins have been developed by long-term denudation since a major exhumation episode, probably driven by rifting or another relevant tectonic event. The second one argues that continental margins underwent alternating burial and exhuma- tion episodes related to crustal tectonic and surface uplift and subsidence. To demonstrate that the proximal domain of the southwestern Angolan margin has evolved in a polycyclic pattern, we present a review of geological and thermochronological information and integrate it with new combined apatite fission-track and (U-Th)/He data from Early Cretaceous volcanic and Precambrian basement samples. We also provide hypotheses on the possible mechanisms able to support the vertical crustal movements of this margin segment, which are also discussed based on some modern rifting models proposed for Central South Atlantic. The central apatite fission-track ages range from 120.6 ± 8.9 to 272.9 ± 21.6 Ma, with the mean track lengths of approximately 12 µm. The single-grain apatite (U-Th)/He ages vary between 52.2 ± 1 and 177.2 ± 2.6 Ma. The integration of the thermochronological data set with published geological constraints supports the following time-temperature evolution: (1) heating since the Carboniferous–Permian, (2) cooling onset in the Early Jurassic, (3) heating onset in the Early Creta- ceous, (4) cooling onset in the Mid- to Late Cretaceous, (5) heating onset in the Late Cretaceous, and (6) cooling onset in the Oligocene–Miocene. The thermochronological data and the geological constraints, support that the proximal domain of the southwestern Angolan margin was covered in the past by pre-, syn-, and post-rift sediments, which were eroded during succeeding exhumation events. For this margin segment, we show that a development based on long-term denudation is less realistic than one based on burial and exhumation episodes during the last 130 Myr. Keywords Apatite fission track · (U-Th)/He · Namibe Basin · Thermal modeling · Thermochronology · Passive margin Introduction Understanding of the rifting process has been improved since classical models of rifting were proposed, such as the pure-shear model (McKenzie 1978), and simple-shear model (Wernicke 1985). The combined analysis of new geophysical data and thermo-mechanical modeling in some recently pub- lished research papers (Brune et al. 2014; Contrucci et al. 2004; Manatschal 2004; Péron-Pinvidic and Manatschal 2008; Strozyk et al. 2016; Torsvik et al. 2009; Whitmarsh et al. 2001) give a new overview of the rifting process, sug- gesting that it might be governed by a succession of com- plex events, characterized by different lithospheric stretching phases that vary in time and space. Non-uniform extension processes that explore the con- cept of depth-dependent extension either at crustal or mantle level (Huismans and Beaumont 2014; Masini et al. 2014; Svartman Dias et al. 2016) coupled with other com- plex mechanisms (Ziegler and Cloetingh 2004; Reston 2009; Lentini et al. 2010; Dafoe et al. 2017) are proposed to explain the occurrence of vertical crustal movements * Bruno Venancio da Silva rochabt@gmail.com 1 Institute of Geosciences and Exact Sciences, UNESP - São Paulo State University, Rio Claro, Brazil 2 Institute of Earth Sciences, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany 3 Faculty of Natural Sciences, Agostinho Neto University, Luanda, Angola http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7796-5674 http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1007/s00531-018-1644-4&domain=pdf 90 International Journal of Earth Sciences (2019) 108:89–113 1 3 related, for example, with tectonic and surface uplift of the rift flanks, with exhumation of the lithospheric mantle or lower crust in the outer margin, with development of the pre-sag unconformity in the marginal basins, and with sag to post-rift subsidence affecting the stretched lithosphere domain seaward of the hinge line. Vertical crustal movements discussed by the new rifting models emphasizes the stretched lithosphere domain and do not focus on the vertical movements that occurs in the proxi- mal domain. The last is classified as a less to non-stretched lithosphere domain where vertical movements related to extension and thinning during rifting (or post-rift) would be limited, although possible surface uplift of the rift flanks may be predicted (Péron-Pinvidic and Manatschal 2008; Brune et al. 2014; Huismans and Beaumont 2014). Data worldwide contend that rift to post-rift evolution of the proximal margins might be controlled by vertical crustal movements related with events of erosion, burial, development of regional unconformities, tectonic reactivation, and magma- tism (Gallagher and Brown 1999; Raab et al. 2002; Lundin and Doré 2002; Japsen et al. 2006; Mohriak et al. 2008; Tinker et al. 2008; Turner et al. 2008; Bache et al. 2011; Guillocheau et al. 2012; Franke 2013; Wu et al. 2014; Dressel et al. 2015, 2017; Bunge and Glasmacher 2018; Colli et al. 2018; Friedrich et al. 2018; Müller et al. 2018; Kukla et al. 2018). In this con- text, two main points of view are highlighted: (1) the evolution of the proximal margins has been driven by long-term denuda- tion since rifting or another tectonic event (e.g., Cockburn et al. 2000; Van Der Beek et al. 2002; Kounov et al. 2009) and (2) the evolution of the proximal margins has been controlled by episodic burial and exhumation events (e.g., Japsen et al. 2006; Green et al. 2015, 2018). The aim of this study is to show that the southwestern Angolan margin known as Namibe margin (Fig.  1) has evolved from cyclical episodes of burial and exhumation. We restore the stratigraphic response of the main vertical crustal movements that occurs during the margin development. For this purpose, a review of geological aspects is presented and integrated with previous and new thermochronological data by applying apatite fission-track (AFT) and (U-Th)/He (AHe) analysis. Bearing in mind that potential exhumation and bur- ial events are related to crustal tectonic and surface uplift and subsidence, some modern rifting models proposed for the Central South Atlantic segment are also discussed, and we speculate some additional possible mechanisms. Geology overview The study area lies within the Angola block of the Congo Craton, which outcrops in the south-central portion of Angola and extends to the north of Namibia (De Waele et al. 2008). The region is characterized by Archean to Palaeoproterozoic gneisses and granites (Araújo and Gui- marães 1992). Further East, these rocks are covered uncon- formably by the Palaeoproterozoic volcano-sedimentary Chela Group (McCourt et al. 2013), while the South and Southwest of the Angola block are respectively surrounded by the Neoproterozoic Damara and Kaoko belts, developed during the Pan–African–Brazilian orogenic cycle (Kroner 1982; Jung and Mezger 2001; Rogers and Santosh 2004). During the Pan-African-Brazilian orogeny, the plat- form and molasse sediments from the Proterozoic Damara Sequence were deposited, overlying the Pre-Cambrian basement (Miller 1997). Following the Pan-African oro- genic cycle, this Sequence was affected by a long period of Fig. 1 a Bathymetric image of the Central South Atlantic African margin (Ryan et  al. 2009) and location of the marginal basins. b Location map of the study area. White lines represent inferred bound- aries between continental, transitional, and oceanic crust domains (Reid and Ashfield 2016). Note the locations of the Figs. 4 and 7 91International Journal of Earth Sciences (2019) 108:89–113 1 3 erosion, interrupted by the deposition of Karoo sediments in the Carboniferous period at approximately 300 Ma (e.g., Johnson et al. 1996; Catuneanu et al. 2005). The overall stratigraphic record of the Karoo Super- group in southern Africa began with glacially deposits of the Dwyka Formation, currently recognized in basins from the South Africa to the Sudan further north. The Dwyka Group was followed by the Ecca Group, composed mostly of dark shales, siltstones, and sandstones deposited in marine, lacustrine, and deltaic environments. Following, the Beaufort Group consists mostly of fluvially deposited rocks composed of colored mudrock, sandstones, and conglomerates, which were covered by rocks of the Stormberg Group, composed by fluvial and aeolian sediments within semi-arid to arid envi- ronments (Catuneanu et al. 2005). The late stage of the Karoo sedimentation in the continent coincides with the extrusion of the Drakensberg basalts at ~ 180 Ma (Moulin et al. 2017) related to the onset of Gondwana breakup processes. In northwest Namibia, the Stormberg Group was overlaid unconformably by the Cretaceous Etendeka Group, com- posed by the Twyfelfontein, Awahab, Tafelberg, and Etend- eka Formations, in the Huab Basin (Fig. 2) (Marsh and Mil- ner 2007). The Twyfelfontein Fm. is composed from base to top by fluvial, fluvial–aeolian, and Aeolian deposits that record a change from semi-arid to extremely arid conditions (Porchetti and Wagensommer 2015). Those Aeolian deposits exhibit lateral changes with the Etendeka basalts (Porchetti and Wagensommer 2015) dated in ~ 132 Ma (Renne et al. 1996). The Etendeka volcanics have been considered as the last expression of the Karoo volcanism (Drakensberg Gr.) (e.g., Eales et al. 1984; Catuneanu et al. 2005), and are asso- ciated to rifting and opening of the South Atlantic Ocean. Namibe Angolan margin development The Namibe Basin, also called the Mossamedes Basin (Giresse et al. 1984), was formed during the Jurassic-Early Cretaceous rifting of the South Atlantic margin. This basin includes the southern edge of the West African Salt Basins (WASB) at the southern end of the Angolan margin. To the south, the basin is limited by the Walvis Ridge, which sepa- rates it from the basins of the Namibian margin (Fig. 1). Fluvial–lacustrine sedimentary rocks typical of an intrac- ratonic environment possibly equivalent to that of the Karoo sedimentary rocks have recently been recognized along the Fig. 2 Distribution of the Karoo sedimentary rocks around the study area (red rectangle), as per Catuneanu et al. (2005). Karoo sedimentary rocks outcrop within the exposed areas of the Owambo, Huab, and Waterberg basins and subcrop to the eastern side of Angola 92 International Journal of Earth Sciences (2019) 108:89–113 1 3 onshore Namibe margin (e.g., Beglinger et al. 2012; Gindre- Chanu et al. 2015, 2016), indicating that there was a pre-rift stage (Fig. 3). During the rifting period, the Namibe Basin was filled by a thick fluvial–lacustrine sequence (Maslanyj et al. 1992; Koch and Coole 2014; Fig. 4) and by a volcanic extrusion at ~ 130 Ma equivalent to Etendeka volcanics in Namibia, named the Bero Complex (Marsh and Swart 2016), which also overlapped unconformably the pre-rift sequence (Beglinger et al. 2012) (Fig. 3). Fig. 3 Schematic stratigraphic section from the onshore Namibe Basin, showing the pre-salt deposits, Bambata Formation (salt), and post-salt deposits, as per Gindre-Chanu et al. (2016) Fig. 4 Geological section from the offshore Namibe basin inter- preted from 2D seismic section and gravity modeling, as per Reid and Ashfield (2016) 93International Journal of Earth Sciences (2019) 108:89–113 1 3 During Late syn-rift, the Bero volcanic was capped unconformably by a transgressional sequence, represented by the Cangulo and Tumbalunda Formations, marking the sag stage of the Basin (Gindre-Chanu et al. 2016, Figs. 3, 4). In the Central South Atlantic, this stage is interpreted as the result of the thermal relaxation of the lithosphere, which may have been associated with the heat flow migra- tion towards the future breakup zone (e.g., Brune et al. 2014). The thermal subsidence of the Namibe margin cul- minated with the salt deposition and gypsum of the Bam- bata Formation (Fig. 3), which is part of the widespread lake environment established in the Aptian in Central South Atlantic (e.g., Kukla et al. 2018). The continental breakup north of Walvis ridge occurred at ~ 112 Ma (Torsvik et al. 2009; Blaich et al. 2011) marking the establishment of the post-rift stage. Over the Bero volcanic rocks, incised valleys filled with Albian conglomerates have also been recognized (Marsh and Swart 2016). The shallow-water marine sedimentary rocks of the Mid- to Late Cretaceous Salinas Formation were also deposited, overlying the continental syn-rift deposits (Strganac et al. 2014, Fig. 5). In addition, the gypsum found along the Namibe coast shows diagenetic features indicating that these rocks were heated by burial during post-rift times (Gindre- Chanu et al. 2016). In the Late Cretaceous, a NW–SE tectonic shortening probable caused by a rotational change between the Afri- can and South American plates induced new surface uplift events along the margin and inland region during the San- tonian event (Binks and Fairhead 1992; Guiraud and Bos- worth 1997). The change in seafloor spreading rates and surface uplifts, were recently attributed to the pulsation of the African plume, and to its southward migration in rela- tion to the African plate (O’Connor et al. 2018). An increase in continental erosion during the Late Cretaceous can be seen in some places along the Namibe margin (Dinis et al. 2010), and is related with the development of a regional erosional surface over both the Pre-Cambrian basement and Bero volcanic extrusions (Green and Machado 2015; Marsh and Swart 2016). Moreover, in the Late Cretaceous, the top of the Salinas Formation was submitted to considerable lev- els of weathering, and mineral recrystallization due to the overlap of the shallow-water to continental Ombe basalts (Strganac et al. 2014). Between the Late Cretaceous and Early Cenozoic, the Ombe basalts were capped unconformably by the marine sedimentary rocks of the Baba and Macuio Formations (Str- ganac et al. 2014, Fig. 5), followed by a set of clastic marine sedimentary rocks (Beglinger et al. 2012). Furthermore, at the eastern edge of the current onshore Namibe Basin, Maas- trichtian to Cenozoic sedimentary rocks are recognized over the previously developed Late Cretaceous erosional surface (Green and Machado 2015; Marsh and Swart 2016). At Oligocene–Miocene, an increase in the sediment supply along the Angolan marginal basins was driven by continental surface or tectonic uplifts (Lavier et al. 2001; Hudec and Jack- son 2002; Jackson et al. 2005) evidenced by preserved marine strata at tens and hundreds meters above the present-day sea level (Giresse et al. 1984; Guiraud et al. 2010, Fig. 6), and by the longitudinal convex profiles from the marginal rivers, which demonstrate the relief immaturity (Macgregor 2013; Gröger et al. 2013; Guiraud et al. 2010; Roberts and White 2010). The increased continental erosion along the Angolan margin was also driven by a relatively wet climate, which was probably consequence of a northward continental migra- tion that started at Mid-Cenozoic (Séranne and Anka 2005). In addition, large submarine fans associated with potential hydrocarbon sources in turbidite deposits have been developed since Oligocene–Miocene times along the Angolan margin (e.g., Macgregor 2010; Babonneau et al. 2010). Previous thermochronological data Few thermochronological papers along the Angolan mar- gin have been published. Jackson et al. (2005) and Green and Machado (2015) presented AFT data from within and adjoining basement along the Kwanza and Namibe Basins. They have constrained AFT thermal events by overlapping in time constraints derived from fission-track data solutions, then, the thermal histories were obtained from palaeotem- peratures estimates. Jackson et al. (2005) proposed three regional cooling events in the Kwanza margin for the periods of 150, 100–70, and 20–10 Ma, where the oldest is associated to maximum palaeotemperatures from 135 to 100 °C and the youngest with palaeotemperatures from 45 to 30 °C. They also have interpreted these events in terms of exhumation and volcan- ism during rifting (150 Ma event), exhumation related to tectonic and volcanism (100–70 Ma event), and exhumation (20–10 Ma event). Five major cooling onsets affecting the Namibe mar- gin have been proposed by Green and Machado (2015) for the periods of 320–285, 195–165, 120–112, 95–70, and 35–20 Ma, which were separated by heating episodes. The authors, based on the remnants of sedimentary strata pre- served over the basement erosion surface, interpret these events in terms of episodic burial and exhumation. In summary, Green and Machado (2015) propose a poly- cyclic evolution for the Namibe margin based on integration between geological evidence and thermal history constraints. For the Kwanza margin, Jackson et al. (2005) interpret their thermal history constraints or estimates of palaeotempera- tures as maximum possible values for burial estimates, and consider other possible causes of heating besides burial. 94 International Journal of Earth Sciences (2019) 108:89–113 1 3 Fig. 5 Stratigraphic section from the onshore Namibe Basin, showing the Late Cretaceous Formations, as per Strganac et al. (2014) 95International Journal of Earth Sciences (2019) 108:89–113 1 3 New apatite fission track and (U‑Th)/He analysis Sampling strategy and methods Thermochronological data were obtained from six out- crop samples from the Namibe Angolan margin, ranging in elevation from 57 to 1026 m. The samples were collected in the same E-W transect analyzed by Green and Machado (2015) and extends from the coast toward the base of the Chela Escarpment (Fig. 7). The sampled rocks encompass the Early Cretaceous quartz-latites (Bero Complex) located in the eastern edge of the onshore Namibe Basin, and the Archean to Palaeoproterozoic basement granites further inland. First, apatite grains were concentrated by crushing and mineral disaggregation using high voltage pulse power frag- mentation (Selfrag) at the Geochronology laboratory at the University of Brasilia, Brazil. Selfrag works with injection of electrical pulses in a sample and the fragmentation occurs at the edge between mineral grains, preserving their shape. After, samples were separated for apatite using heavy liquid, magnetic separation, and hand picking methods. Apatite grains were mounted in epoxy, polished, and etched in 5.5 M HNO3 for 20 s at 21 °C after Donelick et al. (2005). For all samples, the AFT data were ana- lyzed by the external detector method, which allows dating Fig. 6 Palaeo-valleys, palaeo- terraces, and elevated cliffs above the current sea level in the Lobito (a) and Cuio (b) regions, Benguela margin, as per Guiraud et al. (2010) 96 International Journal of Earth Sciences (2019) 108:89–113 1 3 individually the apatite grains from the same sample (see Gallagher et al. 1998; Gleadow 1981). Fission-track count- ing was performed using an optical microscope Zeiss Axio Imager M1 coupled with an MRc5 camera and Axio Vision software. For AHe method, single apatite grains from each sample were observed under the Zeiss Discovery V8 microscope at a magnification of 80 and were categorized according to their shape, size, and lack of obvious fractures and U- or Th-rich inclusions. Samples Ang-17, Ang-08, Ang-09, and Ang-10 yielded high-quality apatite grains which were picked, meas- ured for their length and width using Zeiss Imager software, and were then placed inside Pt tubes. Apatite grains loaded into the Pt tubes were placed in a Cu planchette and outgassed into a high vacuum by rastering a focused diode laser beam of 960 nm (Photon Machines). Determinations of 4He were conducted in static mode, with 4He detection performed in a Faraday cup using a split flight tube noble gas mass spectrometer (GVI-Helix- SFT). After degassing, isotopic dilution was used by spik- ing the samples with a known amount of 235U and 230Th and the amounts of 238U and 232Th were measured using a single-collector double-focusing sector field inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (SF-ICP-MS, ELE- MENT 2). AFT data The central AFT ages range from 120.6 ± 8.9 to 272.9 ± 21.6 Ma and each sample shows single grain age dispersion compatible with a Poissonian distribution (chi- square probability are > 77%, Table 1), suggesting that the grains in each sample belong to the same population (Green 1981, Galbraith 1981). The central AFT ages show an apparent positive correlation with the elevation (Fig. 8). This may be interpreted as older samples have cooled from lower palaeotemperatures when comparing to the younger ones (e.g., Raab et al. 2002) or that those samples may have cooled from the same level, with the samples with older ages having been partially overprinted while those with younger ages were totally overprinted. The AFT ages from the Bero volcanic samples either overlap with (Ang-08) or are slightly older (Ang-17) than their stratigraphic ages, which could reflect the time of the rock emplacement for the first, and a more complex ther- mal history for the last. The basement samples yielded AFT ages much younger than their stratigraphic ages (Table 1) supporting that the thermal histories of these samples were driven by Phanerozoic events. The mean confined track length (MTL), uncorrected to the c-axis angle, varies between 9.6 ± 0.3 and 10.8 ± 0.3 µm and are associated to track length distributions (TLD) rela- tively broader (standard deviations between 1.9 and 2.3 µm). By contrast, the c-axis corrected MTL (all confined tracks were corrected to the c-axis angles according to Ketcham et al. 2007a) varies between 12.3 ± 0.2 and 13.0 ± 0.2 µm and are associated to narrower and unimodal TLD (standard deviations between 0.9 and 1.4 µm) (Table 2). The uncorrected and corrected MTL values are within the range reported by Raab et al. (2002) along the Namibia margin further south, and are within the range reported by Green and Machado (2015) for the Namibe Angolan margin (Fig. 9). However, recent studies point out that c-axis cor- rected track lengths best represent the annealing conditions of a sample (Ketcham et al. 2015, 2007a) and the corrected track lengths from this study are more compatible with val- ues reported by Green and Machado (2015) for the same area Fig. 7 Topographic map (SRTM image) of the Namibe Angolan margin. The red circles show the sample locations used to constrain the thermal histories of this study 97International Journal of Earth Sciences (2019) 108:89–113 1 3 (Fig. 9). Therefore, we adopted c-axis corrected lengths for further interpretations. These corrected MTL values suggest that all samples were subjected to a moderate degree of annealing, imply- ing moderate cooling rates or even more complex ther- mal histories (e.g., Gallagher and Brown 1997). Even the Early Cretaceous Bero volcanic rocks (samples Ang-17 and Ang-08) show relatively annealed MTL values (~ 12.3 µm), implying that they underwent significantly heating post- emplacement and probably, did not remained at surface temperatures during their geological evolution. The Dpar values vary between 1.6 and 1.8 µm (Table 2). According to Carlson et al. (1999), Dpar values below and above 1.75 (i.e., apatite etched in 5.5 M HNO3 for 20 s at 21 °C) might suggest more fast-annealing and more slow-annealing apa- tites, respectively. AHe data The AHe data are summarized in Table 3. Most of the ana- lyzed apatite grains have a spherical equivalent radius (R*) around or larger than 60 µm, which minimize the influence of alpha ejection effect on AHe ages (Farley et al. 1996). The alpha ejection correction (Ft) is appropriated for euhedral apatite grains (two preserved terminations − 2T) assuming a homogeneous distribution of U and Th within the grains (Farley et al. 1996; Ehlers and Farley 2003). Considering that most of the analyzed grains are large (> 60 µm radius), preserve one termination (1T), and we did not account for isotopic zoning within the grains, we used uncorrected AHe ages for interpretations. The Bero volcanic samples Ang-17 (12 grains) and Ang- 08 (9 grains) are characterized by low dispersion (< 15%) of their single grain AHe ages, which vary from 70.0 ± 1.3 to 111.2 ± 3.0 Ma and 66.3 ± 1.2 to 104.8 ± 2.5, respectively (Table 3). Sample Ang-08 lack a clear age – effective ura- nium (eU) and age – R* correlations, while sample Ang-17 lack a clear age – eU correlation and appear to show a posi- tive age – R* correlation (Fig. 10).Ta bl e 1 A pa tit e fis si on -tr ac k da ta U u ra ni um c on ce nt ra tio n in µ g/ g, n : n um be r o f c ou nt ed g ra in s, ρ S d en si ty o f s po nt an eo us tr ac ks (× 1 05 /c m 2 ), N s n um be r o f s po nt an eo us tr ac ks , ρ I:d en si ty o f i nd uc ed tr ac ks (× 1 05 /c m 2 ), N I n um - be r o f i nd uc ed tr ac ks . P (χ 2 ) i s t he p ro ba bi lit y th at si ng le g ra in a ge s a re c on si ste nt a nd b el on g to th e sa m e po pu la tio n. T es t i s p as se d if P (χ 2 ) > 5% (G al br ai th 1 98 1) . A ge s w er e ca lc ul at ed u si ng a ζ- va lu e of 3 54 .6 6 ± 20 .8 3 a/ c m 2 fo r a pa tit e Sa m pl e Li th ol og y La tit ud e Lo ng itu de Fo rm at io n ag e U (s td ) ( µg /g ) n ρ S (×  1 05 /c m 2 ) N S ρ I (× 10 5 / c m 2 ) N I Pχ 2 (% ) C en tra l a ge (M a) ±  (1 σ) (M a) A ng -0 8 La tit e (B er o C om pl ex ) 15 .0 59 27 4° S 12 .2 92 43 7° E Ea rly C re ta ce ou s 7. 5 30 4. 57 4 39 0 6. 65 56 7 10 0 12 8. 6 11 .5 A ng -1 7 La tit e (B er o C om pl ex ) − 14 .9 10 26 0° S 12 .3 98 12 6° E Ea rly C re ta ce ou s 6. 2 20 4. 98 4 20 1 6. 09 9 24 6 10 0 16 7. 0 18 .8 A ng -0 9 G ra ni te /b as em en t 15 .0 10 59 2° S 12 .4 43 91 8° E N eo ar ch ea n 23 .3 30 13 .4 79 94 2 21 .1 64 14 79 10 0 12 0. 5 8. 9 A ng -1 0 G ra ni te /b as em en t 15 .0 26 18 0° S 12 .7 37 86 3° E N eo ar ch ea n 25 .2 30 17 .3 73 10 99 23 .5 07 14 87 77 .4 14 1. 3 10 .2 A ng -1 1 G ra ni te /b as em en t − 15 .0 38 65 7° S 13 .2 08 59 4° E Pa la eo pr ot er oz oi c 14 .5 25 14 .3 74 88 5 13 .3 51 82 2 82 .6 5 20 7. 2 16 .1 A ng -1 2 G ra ni te /b as em en t − 15 .0 52 54 3° S 13 .2 21 25 0° E Pa la eo pr ot er oz oi c 17 .9 20 23 .5 54 94 1 16 .7 21 66 8 99 .8 1 27 2. 9 21 .5 Fig. 8 AFT ages plotted against elevation for samples from this study 98 International Journal of Earth Sciences (2019) 108:89–113 1 3 The basement sample Ang-09 (9 grains) is characterized by moderate dispersion of its single grain AHe ages (19.8%), which vary from 88.7 ± 0.7 and 130.2 ± 1.8 Ma and show an anomalous single age of 177.2 ± 1.6 Ma. This sample seems to show lightly positive age-eU and age-R* correlations. By contrast, the basement sample Ang-10 (13 grains) yielded single grain AHe ages highly dispersed (30.5%) varying from 52.2 ± 1 to 150.3 ± 1.2 Ma. This sample exhibits a positive age-R* correlation and a negative age-eU correla- tion (Fig. 10). In summary, the lack of age-eU correlation combined with the lower inter-grain age dispersion for samples Ang- 08 and Ang-17, suggest that they underwent relatively fast cooling from higher temperatures, faster cooling rates or shorter residence time within the apatite He partial retention zone (AHePRZ, ~ 40–80 °C) in comparison to sample Ang- 09, which shows moderate age dispersion and an apparent positive age – eU and age – R* correlations. By contrast, the highly dispersed AHe ages without positive correlation with eU for sample Ang-10 suggest the influence of differ- ent competing factors on ages, including grain size (e.g., Reiners and Farley 2001), radiation damage (e.g., Flowers et al. 2009; Gautheron et al. 2009), U, Th and Sm zona- tion (e.g., Flowers and Kelley 2011), crystal chemistry (e.g., Gautheron et al. 2013), crystal fragments (e.g., Brown et al. 2013), He implantation (e.g., Spiegel et al. 2009), and the presence of U- and Th-rich inclusions (e.g., Vermeesch et al. 2007). Bearing this in mind, we are unable to account the contribution of these different factors on AHe ages disper- sion, and therefore, we prefer to adopt a more conservative approach and do not use these data to interpret the thermal history of sample Ang-10, as recommended by Flowers and Kelley (2011). Combining AFT and AHe data AFT and AHe ages results from thermal history samples, and they are influenced by the competing factors discussed above. Despite of the ages do not necessarily mean a specific time event, our AFT ages are from Early Cretaceous (with exception of Ang-17) and the single grain AHe ages range from Early to Late Cretaceous suggest cooling event during this time. The moderately annealed MTL for Early Cretaceous Bero volcanic rocks suggest that those underwent tempera- tures within the apatite partial annealing zone (APAZ, ~ 60–120 °C/10 Myr) post their emplacement and require a post-heating cooling event to cool these rocks until near- surface temperatures. In addition, their AHe data require a relatively fast cooling or short residence time through ~ 40–75 °C/1 Myr. This data aspect suggests that the post- emplacement heating was high enough to moderately anneal Ta bl e 2 A pa tit e fis si on -tr ac k le ng th a nd D pa r d at a n C T nu m be r o f m ea su re d co nfi ne d tra ck s, C T m ea n m ea n co nfi ne d tra ck le ng th q uo te d w ith s ta nd ar d er ro rs , s td s ta nd ar d de vi at io n, s ke w s ke w ne ss o f d ist rib ut io n re la tiv e to th e m ea n va lu e (m ea su re o f a sy m m et ry o f t he d ist rib ut io n) , L c m ea n m ea n tra ck le ng th a fte r c -a xi s c or re ct io n, n D pa r n um be r o f e tc h pi t d ia m et er s m ea su re d, D pa r m ea n: m ea n et ch p it di am et er Sa m pl e n C T C T m ea n (µ m ) C T std (µ m ) C T sk ew Lc m ea n (µ m ) Lc st d (µ m ) Lc sk ew n D pa r D pa r m ea n (µ m ) D pa r s td (µ m ) D pa r s ke w A ng -0 8 47 10 .3 ± 0. 3 2. 3 0. 46 12 .4 ± 0. 2 1. 4 0. 12 23 5 1. 5 0. 2 1. 43 A ng -1 7 38 9. 6 ± 0. 3 2. 0 0. 33 12 .3 ± 0. 2 0. 9 − 0 .1 8 19 0 1. 8 0. 1 − 0 .6 1 A ng -0 9 44 10 .2 ± 0. 3 2. 0 0. 78 12 .7 ± 0. 2 1. 2 0. 87 22 0 1. 8 0. 1 − 0 .7 2 A ng -1 0 48 10 .3 ± 0. 3 1. 9 − 0 .1 4 12 .7 ± 0. 2 1. 1 − 0 .1 9 24 0 1. 9 0. 1 − 0 .1 0 A ng -1 1 34 10 .2 ± 0. 4 2. 2 − 0 .0 6 12 .7 ± 0. 2 1. 1 0. 81 17 0 1. 8 0. 1 − 0 .5 9 A ng -1 2 41 10 .8 ± 0. 3 2. 2 − 0 .1 1 13 .0 ± 0. 2 1. 4 − 0 .3 6 20 5 1. 9 0. 1 − 0 .1 6 99International Journal of Earth Sciences (2019) 108:89–113 1 3 the tracks and to reset the AHe system (above ~ 75 °C); then, the subsequent cooling was relatively fast. The basement sample Ang-09 shows single grain AHe ages overlapping within or older than its respective cen- tral AFT age. This aspect associated to positive eU and R* correlations with ages support that this sample underwent relatively longer time within ~ 40–75 °C, a common pattern observed in old cratonic basement rocks (e.g., Flowers et al. 2009; Flowers and Kelley 2011) which were exposed to a long and complex thermal history. The interpretations above are speculative because temper- ature ranges of APAZ and AHePRZ vary according differ- ences in apatite compositions and grain sizes (e.g., Reiners and Farley 2001; Flowers et al. 2009; Wildman et al. 2016). Therefore, we provide an inverse modeling to access a better understanding on the thermal history of the southwestern Angolan margin. Apatite fission track and (U‑Th)/He thermal history inversion Thermal history models were constrained using the QTQt software, based on a Bayesian transdimensional Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm. This approach gen- erate acceptable thermal histories within the 95% confidence limits and are interpreted in terms of the weighted mean of the posterior probability distribution (see Gallagher et al. 2009; Gallagher 2012). In total, we present six inverted ther- mal histories, three combining AFT and all single grain AHe data (i.e., samples Ang-17, Ang-08, and Ang-09), and three using AFT data (i.e., samples Ang-10, Ang-11, and Ang-12). Samples Ang-11 and Ang-12 did not provide high-quality apatite grains for AHe, while sample Ang-10 presented sin- gle grain AHe ages highly dispersed without positive cor- relation with eU, and therefore, these data were not used to constraint thermal histories as discussed earlier. AFT modeling was performed with the annealing model of Ketcham et al. (2007b), using Dpar measurements and c-axis corrected confined tracks after Ketcham et al. (2007a). AHe modeling was performed with the RDAAM model of Flowers et al. (2009), which predicts the effects of radia- tion damage on He retentivity in apatites. For the AFT-AHe modeling, the MCMC algorithm was performed for 200,000 to 300,000 iterations as “post-burn in”, after discarding 50,000 iterations as “burn in”, while for the AFT mod- eling, the MCMC was performed for 1,000,000 iterations as “post-burn in” and 200,000 as “burn in” (see Gallagher et al. 2009). Thermal history constraints and results The thermal history models are shown in Fig. 11. For all samples, initial constraints of 130 ± 5 Ma, 10 ± 10 °C and 70 ± 10 Ma, 10 ± 10 °C were added on models. The first one is supported by Bero volcanic rocks overlying a basement erosional surface (Marsh and Swart 2016; Gindre-Chanu et al. 2016), indicating that the basement was at near-surface temperatures during the Bero volcanic emplacement. The second one is supported by a Late Cretaceous erosional sur- face over the Bero volcanic and over the basement, which is covered by Maastrichtian and younger sediments (Green and Machado 2015; Marsh and Swart 2016). This information also supports that the Bero volcanic and the basement were cool prior being buried by those sediments. For the basement samples Ang-10, Ang-11, and Ang- 12 which yielded older AFT ages, an additional time con- straint of 300 ± 10 Ma was included on the models to infer the beginning of the Karoo sedimentation, as supported by correlate sediments recognized onshore (e.g., Gindre- Chanu et al. 2016) and in the hinterland (e.g., Catuneanu et al. 2005). First, the temperature constraint was 30 ± 30 °C to consider a range of possible palaeotemperatures for the basement during this time. Second, both time and tempera- ture constraints were adjusted according to the probability increase of the thermal histories. For samples Ang-11 and Ang-12, the thermal histories interval prior 130 Ma were poorly constrained by the AFT data and an additional con- straint of 170 ± 20 Ma; 60 ± 20 °C was required to increase the relative probability and to better constraint the thermal histories. Samples Ang-10, Ang-11, and Ang-12 record a period of prolonged heating commencing between Carbonifer- ous–Permian at ~ 300–250 Ma, which reached maximum palaeotemperatures between ~ 90 and 50 °C in the Jurassic times at ~ 180–170 Ma. This heating episode was followed Fig. 9 Plot showing MTL against AFT ages for samples from this study and from Green and Machado (2015). The MTL values from this study fit within the range of values reported by Green and Machado (2015) at the same area, suggesting that both studies support a similar thermal history 100 International Journal of Earth Sciences (2019) 108:89–113 1 3 Ta bl e 3 S um m ar y of a pa tit e (U -T h) /H e da ta Sa m pl e A liq uo t L (µ m ) W (µ m ) R* (µ m ) G ra in m or ph ol - og y Ft M as s ( m g) 23 8 U [µ g/ g] 23 5 U [µ g/ g] 23 2 Th [µ g/ g] 4 H e [c c] Th /U eU [µ g/ g] U nc or re ct ed ag e (M a ± 2σ ) C or re ct ed a ge (M a ± 2σ ) A ng -1 7 1 27 6. 22 17 3. 16 98 .8 8 2T 0. 85 0. 00 7 9. 7 0. 07 35 .9 1. 8E -0 9 3. 72 18 .2 10 5 ± 2. 5 12 3. 8 ± 3 2 28 5. 97 15 9. 31 93 .4 5 1T 0. 84 0. 00 6 9. 3 0. 06 35 .3 1. 4E -0 9 3. 78 17 .7 97 .3 ± 2. 1 11 5. 9 ± 2. 4 3 21 5. 86 18 8. 68 98 .4 7 1T 0. 85 0. 00 5 11 .9 0. 09 43 .2 1. 5E -0 9 3. 65 22 .1 97 .7 ± 2. 2 11 5. 3 ± 2. 6 4 24 1. 41 20 6. 65 10 8. 53 1T 0. 86 0. 00 6 14 .5 0. 10 53 .1 1. 9E -0 9 3. 67 27 94 ± 2. 3 10 9. 1 ± 2. 1 5 22 1. 49 17 0. 09 92 .1 8 1T 0. 84 0. 00 5 12 .7 0. 09 48 .6 1. 3E -0 9 3. 83 24 .2 89 .3 ± 2 10 6. 7 ± 2. 3 6 27 7. 03 22 6. 47 12 0. 57 1T 0. 88 0. 00 6 20 .1 0. 14 74 .3 2. 7E -0 9 3. 7 37 .7 10 1. 2 ± 2. 8 11 5. 6 ± 3. 2 7 39 3. 24 17 3. 07 10 6. 39 1T 0. 86 0. 01 0 14 .1 0. 10 11 .4 2. 3E -0 9 0. 81 16 .9 10 5. 1 ± 1. 7 12 2. 4 ± 2 8 25 2. 59 16 6. 59 93 .9 6 1T 0. 84 0. 00 6 22 .6 0. 16 18 .3 1. 5E -0 9 0. 81 27 70 ± 1. 3 83 .3 ± 1. 5 9 31 6. 07 20 9. 95 11 8. 20 1T 0. 87 0. 01 1 9. 6 0. 07 35 .8 2. 8E -0 9 3. 71 18 .1 11 1. 2 ± 3 12 7. 4 ± 3. 4 10 26 4. 59 22 1. 84 11 7. 23 1T 0. 87 0. 00 8 15 .1 0. 11 53 .8 2. 7E -0 9 3. 56 27 .9 10 0. 4 ± 2. 9 11 5. 1 ± 3. 3 11 29 3. 31 21 3. 26 11 7. 30 1T 0. 87 0. 01 6 5. 9 0. 04 21 .9 2. 5E -0 9 3. 73 11 .1 10 9. 7 ± 2. 8 12 5. 8 ± 3. 2 12 27 6. 15 13 1. 63 79 .7 2 2T 0. 81 0. 00 6 6. 3 0. 05 26 .8 6. 8E -1 0 4. 24 12 .6 75 .1 ± 1. 5 92 .5 ± 1. 8 A ng -8 9 24 5. 80 16 2. 26 91 .5 0 2T 0. 84 0. 00 4 11 .7 0. 07 36 1. 1E -0 9 3. 08 20 .2 10 4 ± 2. 3 12 4. 4 ± 2. 7 10 43 8. 48 17 4 10 8. 89 2T 0. 86 0. 00 9 9. 5 0. 07 29 .5 1. 7E -0 9 3. 09 16 .5 87 .8 ± 2. 2 10 1. 8 ± 2. 5 11 25 8. 72 14 4. 17 84 .5 7 1T 0. 82 0. 00 6 23 .1 0. 16 97 2. 4E -0 9 4. 20 46 .1 76 .6 ± 0. 8 93 .1 ± 0. 9 14 24 9. 85 17 2. 74 96 .2 7 1T 0. 84 0. 00 5 10 .9 0. 08 34 .3 1. 1E -0 9 3. 15 19 88 .4 ± 2 10 4. 7 ± 2. 4 15 16 8. 81 14 3. 83 75 .6 5 1T 0. 8 0. 00 1 25 .7 0. 16 82 .2 4. 8E -1 0 3. 2 45 .1 66 .3 ± 1. 2 82 .7 ± 1. 6 16 20 4. 77 13 9. 79 78 .1 6 1T 0. 81 0. 00 3 13 .6 0. 11 44 .3 8. 1E -1 0 3. 26 24 .1 97 .6 ± 2 12 0. 8 ± 2. 5 17 31 2. 92 14 9. 38 90 .4 5 1T 0. 83 0. 00 5 15 .8 0. 11 49 1. 5E -0 9 3. 1 27 .4 95 .3 ± 2. 3 11 4. 2 ± 2. 6 18 25 5. 96 19 9. 57 10 7. 69 1T 0. 86 0. 01 1 6. 3 0. 05 19 .2 1. 6E -0 9 3. 06 10 .8 10 4. 8 ± 2. 5 12 1. 8 ± 3 19 23 9. 33 15 5. 12 87 .8 7 1T 0. 83 0. 00 4 11 0. 07 35 .7 1. 1E -0 9 3. 25 19 .4 10 0. 9 ± 2. 2 12 1. 7 ± 2. 6 A ng -9 1 29 9. 15 13 2. 24 81 .2 3 1T 0. 82 0. 01 3 8. 31 0. 06 0 17 .5 0 2. 5E -0 9 2. 09 12 .5 12 6. 4 ± 1 15 4. 4 ± 8. 9 2 19 4. 12 93 .0 5 56 .3 0 1T 0. 73 0. 00 4 13 .7 2 0. 09 9 45 .1 3 1. 3E -0 9 3. 27 24 .4 10 5. 6 ± 0. 9 14 3. 8 ± 8. 4 3 18 5. 93 82 .9 3 50 .8 6 1T 0. 71 0. 00 3 14 .0 7 0. 10 2 37 .6 1 8E -1 0 2. 65 23 .0 88 .7 ± 0. 7 12 5. 2 ± 7. 3 4 18 9. 15 10 5. 2 61 .7 3 1T 0. 76 0. 00 5 7. 97 0. 05 8 22 .0 1 1. 1E -0 9 2. 74 13 .2 12 3. 9 ± 1 16 3. 2 ± 9. 5 5 21 5. 92 93 .3 7 57 .5 8 1T 0. 74 0. 00 5 11 .3 7 0. 08 2 25 .7 2 1. 2E -0 9 2. 25 17 .5 12 0. 3 ± 0. 9 16 1. 6 ± 9. 3 2 15 9. 93 10 5. 38 59 .4 5 1T 0. 75 0. 00 1 18 .1 0. 16 60 .2 6. 7E -1 0 3. 32 32 .4 13 0. 2 ± 1. 8 17 4. 1 ± 2. 4 3 22 3. 96 15 8. 19 87 .6 8 0T 0. 83 0. 00 3 32 .2 0. 24 62 .2 1. 8E -0 9 1. 93 47 .1 10 7. 6 ± 1. 8 12 9. 8 ± 2. 1 4 17 5. 81 11 3. 92 64 .5 3 1T 0. 77 0. 00 2 17 0. 12 43 .7 7. 4E -1 0 2. 57 27 .4 12 7. 6 ± 2 16 6. 2 ± 2. 6 9 22 3. 74 11 1. 93 67 .1 5 0T 0. 78 0. 00 1 38 .7 0. 29 10 8. 2 2E -0 9 2. 8 64 .4 17 7. 2 ± 2. 6 22 8. 2 ± 3. 3 A ng -1 0 1 18 6. 14 97 .9 2 58 .1 5 2T 0. 75 0. 00 4 33 .7 9 0. 25 53 .7 1 2. 4E -0 9 1. 58 46 .6 95 .1 ± 0. 7 12 6. 9 ± 7. 3 2 18 0. 65 94 .0 1 55 .9 5 1T 0. 74 0. 00 4 20 .9 6 0. 15 64 .8 1 2. 7E -0 9 3. 07 36 .3 15 0. 3 ± 1. 2 20 4. 0 ± 11 .8 4 24 9. 31 16 6. 79 93 .7 4 1T 0. 84 0. 01 7 19 .4 6 0. 14 37 .8 8 7. 7E -0 9 1. 93 28 .5 12 6. 4 ± 0. 9 15 0. 0 ± 8. 6 5 24 8. 53 14 2. 38 83 .0 1 1T 0. 83 0. 01 3 26 .4 0. 19 40 .5 4 6. 6E -0 9 1. 52 36 .1 11 9. 1 ± 0. 9 14 4. 4 ± 8. 3 6 23 9. 91 10 8. 24 66 .2 4 1T 0. 77 0. 00 2 38 .4 0. 29 58 1. 3E -0 9 1. 51 52 .3 83 .1 ± 8. 5 10 7. 4 ± 1. 3 101International Journal of Earth Sciences (2019) 108:89–113 1 3 by a strong and abrupt cooling episode from Jurassic at ~ 180–160 Ma to Early Cretaceous at ~ 130 Ma that was recorded in all basement samples. For samples Ang-08, Ang-10, Ang-11, and Ang-12, the expected models (weighted mean of the posterior distribu- tion) record a period of thermal stability from Early to Late Cretaceous between ~ 130 and 70 Ma; however, a history involving heating and subsequent cooling during this time interval is also allowed by the models (within the 95% con- fidence limits) and thus, it is not precluded by the data. In addition, the sample Ang-17 supports an abrupt heating event commencing at ~ 130 Ma, associated to maximum palaeotemperatures of ~ 70–60 °C, followed by an abrupt cooling until the surface at ~ 70 Ma. On the other hand, the sample Ang-09 supports a period of thermal stability or gradual slight cooling between ~ 130 and 70 Ma. All the analyzed samples record a last prolonged heating event commencing in the Late Cretaceous at ~ 70 Ma, and reaching maximum palaeotemperatures between ~ 50 and 20 °C in the Oligocene–Miocene between ~ 30 and 5 Ma. This heating requires a last abrupt cooling event to cool those samples until the present-day surface temperatures. Integration of the thermal events from this study with geology and rifting models Early Permian to Early Jurassic heating The thermal histories from basement samples support a paleo heating between ~ 300 and 250 Ma and 180 and –170 Ma, related to peak temperatures between ~ 90 and 50 °C (Fig. 11). This palaeo-heating event is contemporane- ous, and probably, represents the deposition of Karoo sedi- ments over the Namibe basement. This purpose is supported by the occurrence of Karoo outcrops and subcrops on the hinterland (Jerram et al. 1999; Johnson et al. 1996; Miller 1997, Fig. 2) and possibly in the pre-rift sequence from the onshore Namibe Basin (Gindre-Chanu et al. 2015, Fig. 3). This interpretation is also supported by the similarity of the basement heating presented here with other thermal his- tories from southern Africa where Karoo sediments outcrop (e.g., Flowers and Schoene 2010; Wildman et al. 2015). In addition, from the AFT data of Brown et al. (2014), it is inferred that Karoo sedimentary rocks could be more exten- sive and thicker in the geological past than those rocks cur- rently preserved in northern Namibia. Furthermore, cross-bedded sandstones recognized in the onshore Namibe Basin similar to Karoo were also recog- nized in the Botucatu Formation within the Palaeozoic Par- ana Basin in Brazil (e.g., Scherer 2000). All these evidences support the idea of a large-scale intracratonic basin covering a portion of both African and South American continents A liq uo t re fe rs to s in gl e gr ai n ag es m ea su re d in a s am pl e, L l en gt h of t he s in gl e gr ai ns , W w id th o f th e si ng le -g ra in s, R* s ph er ic al e qu iv al en t ra di us o f th e si ng le g ra in s (R * = ( 3* (R L) )/ (2 *( R + L )) w he re R = W /2 ), T nu m be r o f p re se rv ed te rm in at io ns in th e si ng le g ra in s, Ft a lp ha e je ct io n fa ct or fo r a pa tit e, c al cu la te d af te r K et ch am e t a l. (2 01 1) a ss um in g a ho m og en eo us d ist ri- bu tio n of U a nd T h, e U : e ffe ct iv e ur an iu m (e U = U + 0. 23 5* Th ) Ta bl e 3 (c on tin ue d) Sa m pl e A liq uo t L (µ m ) W (µ m ) R* (µ m ) G ra in m or ph ol - og y Ft M as s ( m g) 23 8 U [µ g/ g] 23 5 U [µ g/ g] 23 2 Th [µ g/ g] 4 H e [c c] Th /U eU [µ g/ g] U nc or re ct ed ag e (M a ± 2σ ) C or re ct ed a ge (M a ± 2σ ) 7 35 6. 30 14 8. 40 92 .1 2 1T 0. 84 0. 01 1 28 .6 0. 21 51 .3 6. 9E -0 9 1. 79 40 .9 12 9. 1 ± 8. 5 15 4. 2 ± 1. 8 8 25 5. 4 12 7 76 .2 8 2T 0. 80 0. 00 4 23 .8 0. 17 50 .4 2. 1E -0 9 2. 11 35 .9 11 3. 1 ± 1. 3 14 0. 8 ± 1. 6 9 20 7 11 5. 9 67 .9 1 1T 0. 78 0. 00 2 58 .3 0. 41 12 1. 3 1. 3E -0 9 2. 08 87 .3 57 ± 0. 6 73 .2 ± 0. 8 10 23 9. 38 12 3. 81 73 .7 8 1T 0. 80 0. 00 5 25 0. 19 66 .7 2. 3E -0 9 2. 67 40 .9 96 .9 ± 1 12 1. 6 ± 1. 3 11 23 3 95 .2 7 59 .3 2 1T 0. 75 0. 00 2 45 .9 0. 32 13 3. 2 1. 8E -0 9 2. 9 77 .6 10 0. 6 ± 1 13 4. 6 ± 1. 4 12 19 3. 87 12 4. 44 70 .6 5 1T 0. 79 0. 00 2 51 .6 0. 37 10 1. 8 1. 0E -0 9 1. 97 75 .8 52 .2 ± 1 66 .3 ± 0. 7 13 20 3. 58 90 .1 2 55 .3 4 1T 0. 73 0. 00 1 27 .3 0. 2 77 .2 4. 8E -1 0 2. 82 45 .7 57 .7 ± 0. 6 79 .2 ± 0. 9 14 31 2. 02 14 1. 44 86 .4 8 1T 0. 83 0. 00 6 39 .5 0. 29 71 .5 4. 3E -0 9 1. 81 56 .6 10 0. 4 ± 1 12 1. 5 ± 1. 2 102 International Journal of Earth Sciences (2019) 108:89–113 1 3 prior to the Gondwana breakup, as proposed by Milani and De Wit (2008), among others. The Jurassic peak temperatures from this study (~ 180 Ma) also coincide with the extensive Karoo magma- tism in southern Africa (Svensen et al. 2012). Considering the relevance of this event in Africa, these Jurassic peak tem- peratures might be attributed, at least in part, to an additional heat source in complement to burial. For example, Brown et al. (1994) reported peak temperatures of ~ 250 ± 50 °C within the main Karoo Basin, contemporaneous with Karoo magmatism. They suggested that a hydrothermal system related to the igneous activity is an important mechanism able to account for this exceeding heating within the Karoo Basin, and highlighted the importance of this process on the shallow crust. Early Jurassic to Early Cretaceous cooling The first palaeo-cooling episode recorded by the basement samples encompasses a time interval between ~ 180 and 170 Ma and 130 Ma (Fig. 11), coeval with the Late pre-rift and Early syn-rift stages of the Namibe margin develop- ment (e.g., Beglinger et al. 2012). This pronounced paleo cooling event, also suggested by the most AFT and AHe ages (Tables 1, 3), probably reflects an abrupt exhumation Fig. 10 Relationships of the single grain AHe ages, uncorrected for alpha ejection, against the eU and R* for each sample from this study 103International Journal of Earth Sciences (2019) 108:89–113 1 3 event of the basement prior to Bero eruption (e.g., Friedrich et al. 2018). Pre-rift doming and exhumation processes are classically predicted on magma-rich margins where the initiation of rifting would be induced by convective upwelling asthe- nosphere. However, these processes would be less obvious in magma-poor margins where rifting is triggered by far- field intraplate stresses, and upwelling mantle would have a secondary role (e.g., Bott 1995). On the other hand, recent studies suggest that pre-rift, or Early syn-rift doming and exhumation, both in volcanic and non-volcanic rifts, are not necessarily induced by hot-spot or active mantle plume, but may also be explained as a consequence of lithospheric extension which facilitates the asthenosphere upwelling (Ziegler and Cloetingh 2004; Franke 2013). Svartman Dias et al. (2016) studying thinning profiles from geodynamic rift models, compatible with highly asymmetric rift systems such as Santos–Namibe segment of the Central South Atlantic, proposes that the lithospheric mantle is much more stretched and thinned than the whole crust beneath rift flanks, triggering uplift of the proximal domain during rifting. In addition, Huismans and Beaumont (2011, 2014) propose a counter-flow of depleted, cratonic lithospheric mantle towards the outer region of the margin, which may have occurred during thinning or distal exhuma- tion phases of the rift evolution. These mechanisms could have removed lithospheric mantle, facilitating upwelling of the asthenosphere and hence tectonic and surface uplift in the proximal domain of the Namibe margin. Considering that the Namibe margin is very close to the southern, magma-rich segment of the South Atlantic, pre-rift doming, and exhumation could be induced, at least in part, by large wavelength deformation related to mantle plume (e.g., Friedrich et al. 2018; Guillocheau et al. 2018). On the other hand, since the conjugated Santos-Namibe seg- ment presents mainly characteristics of magma-poor margin, such as a highly stretched lithosphere domain, a lack of high impedance seaward dipping reflector sequences (SRDs), and a limited magmatism (e.g., Aslanian et al. 2009; Strozyk et al. 2016; Clerc et al. 2018; Kukla et al. 2018), tectonic processes possibly related to the initial stages of extension, may have played a main hole at a pre-rift stage in the area. These processes already entering the rift stage would also account for tectonic and surface uplift and exhumation of the rift shoulders in the proximal domain, and thus sup- port the pronounced cooling observed in our models. Many other mechanisms such as flexural uplift by isostatic rebound (Weissel and Karner 1989; Van Der Beek et al. 1994; Burov and Cloetingh 1997), lower crustal flow (Burov and Cloet- ingh 1997; Péron-Pinvidic and Manatschal 2008; Aslanian et al. 2009; Dressel et al. 2016; Brune et al. 2017), and mantle convection or plume-related processes (Buck 1986; Ebinger et al. 1989; Friedrich et al. 2018) may also have played an important role; however, the weight attributed to each of these distinct mechanisms may not be established in this work. Regardless of the mechanisms, the existence of an uncon- formity between pre- and syn-rift sequences in the Namibe onshore (Fig. 3) support a pre-rift doming and exhumation (Ziegler and Cloetingh 2004; Franke 2013; Friedrich et al. 2018). Similarly, syn-rift exhumation in the Namibe margin is supported by the pre-sag unconformity at the top of the Bero volcanic (Fig. 3) and by the thick sedimentary wedge, currently preserved offshore as inferred by geophysical data (Maystrenko et al. 2013; Mazur et al. 2016). A similar corre- lation between pronounced continental cooling and acceler- ated denudation during South Atlantic rifting is widespread throughout the southwestern margin of Africa (e.g., Brown et al. 1990, 2002; Green et al. 2015; Tinker et al. 2008; Wildman et al. 2016). Early to Mid‑Cretaceous heating Sample Ang-17 requires an Early to Mid-Cretaceous palaeo- heating between ~ 130 and 110 Ma associated to peak tem- peratures of ~ 70–60 °C. Although the thermal histories from the other samples from this study do not show this event clearly, they allow a paleo heating event during this time and allow a wide range of peak temperatures between ~ 10 and 60 °C, within 95% credible intervals (with exception of sam- ple Ang-10 that indicate slow monotonic cooling between ~ 130 and 70 Ma) (Fig. 11). As discussed earlier, this epi- sode is also supported by the relatively annealed MTL values from Bero volcanic samples (Table 2) indicating that those were heated after their Early Cretaceous emplacement. This palaeo-heating (or possible palaeo-heating) is coe- val with the widespread subsidence and burial event that marks the Late syn-rift (sag) stage of the marginal Angolan basins, suggesting that both onshore Namibe Basin and sur- round basement may be subsided and buried by sediments. In Namibe onshore, this phase of subsidence and burial is also supported by the occurrence of transgressional strata onlapping the Bero volcanic and syn-rift rocks (Strganac et al. 2014; Gindre-Chanu et al. 2015, 2016). In addition, the gypsum and evaporites of the onshore Bambata Forma- tion indicate diagenetic features consistent with their post- rift burial (Gindre-Chanu et al. 2015, 2016), which is also supported by the preserved marine strata overlying these evaporites onshore (Green and Machado 2015). Despite conspicuous geological evidence for subsidence and burial in Namibe onshore, a lack of geological mark- ers limits more interpretations regarding its influence on the basement inland. However, along the eastern edge of the onshore Namibe Basin, Marsh and Swart (2016) described relevant geological aspects: (1) Bero volcanic rocks overlie pre-rift sediments and also the basement; (2) Bero volcanic 104 International Journal of Earth Sciences (2019) 108:89–113 1 3 105International Journal of Earth Sciences (2019) 108:89–113 1 3 are usually down-faulted against basement to the west, and Cretaceous sediments are down-faulted against the Bero vol- canic to the west; and (3) mafic dykes and gabbroic sheets are found intruding the Bero complex. All those aspects pro- vide evidence for the presence of volcanic and sedimentary rocks in the geological past, covering the present-day proxi- mal domain of the Namibe margin. In other words, the burial of the Bero volcanic by a transgressional sequence reflects the subsidence and burial of the margin by sediments that could be extended further inland. Bearing in mind that Bero volcanic and basement were subsided and buried post ~ 130 Ma, this burial event requires a following exhumation event of the same magnitude to expose these rocks at the surface temperatures at ~ 70 Ma (Fig. 11). Therefore, some important aspects regarding the magnitude of this burial could explain the pattern observed on thermal histories. In the Namibe offshore, the Late Cre- taceous sedimentary strata is relatively thin, < 1 km (May- strenko et al. 2013) suggesting limited Late Cretaceous exhumation event and thus, limited preceding burial. This agrees well with the preserved sedimentary section above the Bero volcanic and below the Late Cretaceous planation surface (< 500 m), suggesting limited burial (e.g., Gindre- Chanu et al. 2016; Strganac et al. 2014). If we speculate conservative burial values between 0.5 and 1 km for this period, using a geothermal gradient of 25 °C / km (Green and Machado 2015), the heating predicted by our thermal histories would be between ~ 12.5 and 25 °C, and if we adopt an increased geothermal gradient of 40 °C/km, the heating predicted would be between ~ 20 and 40 °C. These suggest that other sources for heating besides burial may contributed to the peak temperature recorded in sample Ang-17, and thus, the “plateau” indicated by the expect models in other samples (between 130 and 70 Ma) may be indicative of a minor burial episode (of the order of hundreds of meters) followed by a minor Late Cretaceous exhumation event of similar magnitude. Evidence from continental subsidence and burial are also reported in the submerged Walvis Ridge, south of the study area (Fig. 1). This ridge probably began to subside in the Albian times and preserve denudation features such as palaeo-incised valleys (Behrmann et al. 2011) suggesting that at least, part of this ridge was at the surface in the past. Furthermore, the occurrence of Etendeka basalts and cor- related sedimentary rocks preserved in Namibia hinterland, amongst their AFT data indicating reheating of these units (e.g., Green et al. 2009; Menges et al. 2013) suggests a large- scale, continental subsidence episode over the southwestern margin of Africa. Some rifting models for the South Atlantic (e.g., Brune et al. 2014; Huismans and Beaumont 2014) do not predict subsidence of the proximal domain during the sag stage. However, this paleo heating episode suggests that the sub- sidence and burial that affected the Namibe Basin (stretched lithosphere and necking domain) could be extended further inland on the basement (proximal domain), and probably, this widespread subsidence and burial event was triggered by a common mechanism. This interpretation is supported by Svartman Dias et al. (2016) which proposed a model with a lithospheric mantle thinner than the crust beneath the proximal domain. In this case, the subsidence of the proximal domain could be larger and predicted when the rift-related asthenospheric thermal anomaly migrates towards the future breakup zone. Entering the post-rift stage, the subsidence is marked by lithospheric cooling and consequent sediment overburden (e.g., Rowan 2014; Dressel et al. 2017). Another possible scenario, for example, involves dynami- cally induced subsidence episodes affecting the southwest- ern margin of Africa (including the Walvis Ridge region) between ~ 100 and 70 Ma (O’Connor et  al. 2018). The authors attribute uplift and subsidence events as well as changes in seafloor spreading rates and tectonic reactiva- tions during this time, as consequence of distinct pulses and motions of the African plume. In summary, the subsidence of the proximal Namibe margin, speculatively, may be interpreted as part of the rift evolutionary process advancing to the post-rift stage in a context in which deep-dependent processes (e.g., Huismans and Beaumont 2011; Svartman Dias et al. 2016) probably affected a broad region beyond the present-day boundaries of the Namibe Basin, instead, deep mantle processes may be directly or indirectly related to subsidence during post- rift times (e.g., O’Connor et al. 2018). In addition, specific mechanisms working beneath the proximal domain, such as asthenospheric underplating (Ziegler and Cloetingh 2004; Huismans and Beaumont 2011), removal of the lower crust for core complexes formation (Aslanian et al. 2009; Huis- mans and Beaumont 2014) may have contributed for subsid- ence during sag and post-rift phases. Mid‑ to Late Cretaceous cooling A Mid- to Late Cretaceous cooling event between ~ 110 and 100 and 70  Ma, following the preceding Early to Fig. 11 Inverted AFT-AHe and AFT thermal histories from this study. In the left hand side are plotted the time–temperature paths: central solid lines indicate the expected model (weighted mean of the posterior distribution) between two other peripheral black lines indicating 95% credible intervals for the expected models. Colour maps indicate the probability distribution of tested models and the black boxes indicate the constraints on time–temperature. In the right hand side are plotted the AFT and AHe parameters: histo- grams indicate the observed TLD, red lines indicate the predicted TLD, and the observed AHe and AFT ages are plotted against pre- dicted ages ◂ 106 International Journal of Earth Sciences (2019) 108:89–113 1 3 Mid-Cretaceous heating, is required based on the joint inter- pretation between thermal histories and geological informa- tion. This cooling event may be resulted from exhumation, despite other sources of heating that could have contributed for preceding palaeotemperatures. The fact that this event does not appear clearly in most of our models is in par- tial agreement with AFT data from Green and Machado (2015) which do not support Late Cretaceous cooling in most of their samples alongside the Namibe coast. Instead, the authors identified Late Cretaceous cooling in basement samples around to the Chela escarpment, and a similar cool- ing event at this location is allowed, but is not required, by our thermal solutions (within 95% credible intervals) (Fig. 11). Nevertheless, we list some conspicuous geological aspects: (1) a Late Cretaceous erosional surface is rec- ognized over the basement and Bero volcanic (Green and Machado 2015; Marsh and Swart 2016); (2) the top of marine Salinas Formation was exposed to surface and weathering prior to being covered by Late Cretaceous Ombe basalts (Strganac et al. 2014); and (3) Dinis et al. (2010) describe a Campanian Gilbert delta composed mostly of basaltic and quartzite clasts, indicating local continental progradation. These are relevant arguments for the existence of a Late Cretaceous exhumation event in at least some places along the Namibe margin. Casciello et al. (2016) also recognized a NE–SW faulting trend that probably controlled the emplacement of the Ombe basalts (Bentiaba basanite event), also suggesting that uplifts on the period could be related to tectonic and magmatic events. Considering that the thermal data have its limitations and the Bayesian approach naturally prefers simpler thermal his- tories that best fit the data (Gallagher 2012), we propose that there was a minor Late Cretaceous uplift event in the proxi- mal domain of the Namibe margin, which due to its magni- tude in comparison to other events, does not appear clearly in our thermal histories. This interpretation is also supported by the thinner Late Cretaceous sedimentary strata currently preserved in the offshore Namibe Basin (e.g., Maslanyj et al. 1992; Maystrenko et al. 2013). This event consists of a disturbance in the thermal relaxa- tion and subsidence of the lithosphere in the Namibe seg- ment that might be consequence of tectonic stresses, changes in plate spreading rates, dynamic uplift, or a combination of those (e.g., Guiraud and Bosworth 1997; Colli et al. 2014; Friedrich et al. 2018; O’Connor et al. 2018). Late Cretaceous to Oligocene–Miocene heating Thermal histories solutions indicate a last palaeo-heating event beginning at ~ 70 Ma (Fig. 11). Most samples from this study require Oligocene–Miocene peak temperatures higher than those allowed for Mid-Cretaceous peak tem- peratures, except for sample Ang-17 (Fig. 11). This data aspect, coupled with geological information indicating minor Early to Mid-Cretaceous burial, support that the major post-rift burial event affecting the proximal domain of the Namibe margin commenced at ~ 70 Ma. Therefore, Oligocene–Miocene peak temperatures of ~ 20–50 °C are consistent with a maximum burial estimate between ~ 0.8 and 2 km of sediments, assuming a geothermal gradient of 25°C/km as reported by Green and Machado (2015) for the Namibe margin. The main geological evidence supporting a new phase of subsidence and burial onshore is the presence of Maas- trichtian and young sediments overlying the Late Cretaceous erosional surface (Green and Machado 2015; Marsh and Swart 2016). Another relevant argument is the fact that the marine Baba and Mocuio Formations cover the continental to shallow-water Ombe basalts (Fig. 5, Strganac et al. 2014). We interpret this paleo heating event beginning at ~ 70 Ma (Fig. 11) as the resumption of the post-rift subsidence and burial of the proximal domain due to the thermal relaxation of the lithosphere. Oligocene–Miocene to recent cooling All samples from this study recorded a last palaeo-cooling episode commencing between Oligocene–Miocene times at ~ 30 − 5 Ma (Fig. 11) which is coeval to widespread episodes of continental uplifts, denudation, and increased sedimenta- tion rates within the marginal Angolan basins (Giresse et al. 1984; Jackson et al. 2005; Guiraud et al. 2010; Macgregor 2013). The smaller magnitude of the Oligocene–Miocene cool- ing in comparison to the Late Jurassic cooling (Fig. 11), combined with the lack of Cenozoic AFT and AHe ages (Tables 1, 3), suggests that exhumation may have been higher during pre- and syn-rift stages of the margin devel- opment than those in the Cenozoic times. Tectonic driven denudation is suggested mainly by the reactivation of faulting activity during the Cenozoic (Cas- ciello et al. 2016). Similarly, the preserved Cenozoic marine strata uplifted up to hundreds of meters above the current sea level (e.g., Giresse et al. 1984; Green and Machado 2015, Fig. 6) could attest for tectonic or epeirogenic processes affecting the Namibe margin. The observed verticality of the Miocene cooling (Fig. 11) indicates a fast and abrupt exhumation episode with maxi- mum rates of ~ 0.3 km/Ma (assuming a geothermal gradient of 25°C/km and a cooling magnitude of 40 °C for the last 5 Ma). This value corroborates with increased uplift rates estimated along the Angolan margin and hinterland for the last ~ 10 Ma, ascribed to mantle convective processes and to the growth of the Bié Dome (Roberts and White 2010). In 107International Journal of Earth Sciences (2019) 108:89–113 1 3 addition, Walker et al. (2016) also proposed that Late Qua- ternary uplifts along the Angolan margin are consequence of mantle processes, such as convective upwelling. This infor- mation is consistent with the appearance of broad swells in southern Africa since ~ 15 Ma as the result of mantle thermal anomalies (Colli et al. 2018) and corroborates with a growing number of studies suggesting that the modern topography of southern Africa have been formed by uplifts and exhumations events post ~ 30 Ma, which are dynamically supported (e.g., Nyblade and Robinson 1994; Burke 1996; Lithgow-Bertelloni and Silver 1998; Al-hajri et al. 2009; Guillocheau et al. 2018). Most works along the Namibian and South African mar- gins estimates lower continental denudation rates during Cenozoic (e.g., Brown et al. 1990; Raab et al. 2002; Tinker et al. 2008; Wildman et al. 2015), in comparison to the rates estimated for the Angolan margin (e.g., Lavier et al. 2001; Macgregor 2010). These lower denudation rates in Namibia is supported by thinner sedimentary strata cur- rently preserved offshore (e.g., Maslanyj et al. 1992; De Vera et al. 2010). The details of this process are open to discussion: (1) the differential continental denudation was driven by differential tectonic or epeirogeny between these margins or (2) the differential denudation was driven mainly by climatic changes, whereas the Angolan side has had a relatively wetter climatic conditions since the Oli- gocene (e.g., Macgregor 2013; Scotese 2000, Serrane and Anka 2005). Considering that Cenozoic uplifts and vertical displace- ments have also been reported in Namibia (e.g., Roberts and White 2010; Mvondo et al. 2011; Stollhofen et al. 2014), we propose that the climate has played a fundamental role in the pattern of continental erosion along the Namibe Ango- lan margin, together with possible tectonic or epeirogenic control. In conclusion, we propose that the Oligocene–Miocene to recent cooling inferred by our thermal histories (Fig. 11) represents the combination between uplift and erosion driven by tectonic or epeirogenic process, and by relatively wet climatic conditions. This event would also be respon- sible for the exhumation and exposure of the present-day onshore Namibe Basin and its surrounding basement fur- ther inland. This interpretation is in agreement with Jackson et al. (2005), namely that the Kwanza Basin further north (Fig. 1) remained in marine conditions until a last exhuma- tion episode during Miocene - Pliocene times, which was responsible for removing ~ 1–1.5 km of overburden from the basement as inferred by AFT data. This information suggests that both basins evolved similarly from a regional uplift epi- sode affecting a large area of the crust, possibly controlled by a common mechanism. The vertical crustal movements of the namibe Angolan margin and their stratigraphic response We restore the main vertical crustal movements that took place along the Namibe Angolan margin during the late half of Phanerozoic by integrating our review with new AFT and AHe data. In the Carboniferous–Permian times, i.e., at approxi- mately 300–250 Ma, Karoo sediments begin to be depos- ited in over the Congo Craton, covering the Namibe region (Fig. 12a). In the Jurassic, at approximately 180–170 Ma, the Karoo burial was interrupted by pre-rift doming and exhu- mation, probably related to the early stages of lithospheric thinning, forming the unconformity between pre- and syn- rift sequences, currently recognized onshore (Fig. 12b). During rifting progress, the thinning of the lithospheric mantle beneath the rift flanks (proximal domain) probably caused tectonic and surface uplift, magmatism (Bero vol- canic extrusion) and denudation, responsible for transport- ing large amounts of sediments into the Namibe Basin. The development of down-faulted blocks during rifting probably preserved the Karoo rocks currently recognized in the Basin, and the uplifted blocks above the base-level were partially eroded forming the pre-sag unconformity associated with the formation of incised valleys over Bero volcanic (Fig. 12b). At approximately 130 Ma, the heat flow migration towards the outer margin and the thermal relaxation of the litho- sphere probably resulted in subsidence and burial, marking the Late syn-rift (sag) stage. The proximal domain was bur- ied by a transgressional sequence that also overlaid the Bero volcanic rocks. The transgression culminated with the salt deposition followed by a set of marine sedimentary strata during the post-rift stage (Fig. 12c). In the Mid- to Late Cretaceous, between approximately 110 and 70 Ma, a disturbance in the thermal relaxation induced reactivation of faults, magmatism (Ombe basalts) and uplift in the Namibe margin. This event is associated to the formation of a conspicuous erosional surface affecting the basement and is related to a local increase of continental erosion (Fig. 12d). The resumption of the thermal relaxation induced reburial of the margin by Maastrichtian and Cenozoic sediments (Fig. 12e). In the Oligocene–Miocene, at approximately 30–5 Ma, the subsidence and burial of the margin were interrupted by a new abrupt exhumation event, which has been related with faulting and uplifts. In combination with a relatively wet climate, the exhumation along the Namibe margin is increased and this led to an important increase in the siliciclastic flux towards the Namibe Basin. This event was responsible for removing Cenozoic rocks from the present-day proximal domain of the margin, and for the 108 International Journal of Earth Sciences (2019) 108:89–113 1 3 Fig. 12 Schematic development for the Namibe Angolan margin based on integration between geological information and AFT-AHe thermal solutions from this study 109International Journal of Earth Sciences (2019) 108:89–113 1 3 exhumation of the onshore Namibe Basin to its current posi- tion. (Fig. 12f). Despite some differences regarding the magnitudes of the events, the cooling events predicted by our inverted thermal histories are most consistent with the cooling events reported by Green and Machado (2015); hence, our restoration agrees with the model of cyclic episodes of burial and exhumation previously advocated by Green and Machado (2015) for the Namibe margin. Furthermore, our model shows similarities with other polycyclic models worldwide (e.g., Japsen et al. 2006; Green et al. 2015). Recently, Green et al. (2018) have pointed out relevant geological and thermochronological evidence that passive margins worldwide have undergone episodic burial and exhumation events rather than mono- tonic denudation since rifting. These interpretations are strongly in concordance with our overview presented for the southwestern Angolan margin. Conclusion The model of the margin evolution presented here shows that the southwestern coast of Angola has evolved in a polycy- clic pattern during the Late Phanerozoic, implying that this margin segment may not be interpreted as purely “passive”. Therefore, the currently proximal domain of the Namibe Angolan margin probably was covered by sediments from before, during and after rifting, which were eroded following succeeding exhumation events. In the same way that modern models have demonstrated that rifting to breakup processes are marked by a succession of complex events, we show that the proximal domain of the Namibe margin, theoretically defined as being less or unaf- fected by crustal stretching, may also have had a complex evolution. This approach opens the possibility that the pro- cesses related to extension and thinning during rifting, which are characteristic of the sag and distal domains, may also occur in the proximal domain of the margin and influence its rift- to post-rift evolution. In the same way, the mantle processes may have been of fundamental importance during rifting to post-rift times, whether directly or indirectly. The interaction between mantle dynamics, tectonic processes, and climate seems to have been essential during the Ceno- zoic evolution of the Namibe margin, accounting for the pronounced Oligocene–Miocene exhumation. The combined AFT and AHe modeling coupled with geological information provides a helpful strategy for the interpretation of the events that control the passive margins evolution. Furthermore, robust thermal histories could eluci- date the geological evolution of regions that mostly lack cur- rent geological and stratigraphic markers, such as the inland domain of the Namibe Angolan margin. We believe that this integration is a fundamental approach, able to provide the correct foundation to elucidate how continental margins evolve. Acknowledgements Acknowledgements are given to the National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) for the scholarship and to Elton Luiz Dantas for using the SELFRAG labora- tory at the University of Brasilia, Brazil. We also acknowledge the Faculty of Natural Sciences of Agostinho Neto University, Angola, for their support during fieldwork and the Institute of Earth Sciences at the Heidelberg University, Germany, for the preparation of the samples for AFT analysis. We are also grateful to Paul F. Green and anonymous reviewer for their constructive comments and important improvements on the manuscript. References Al-hajri Y, White N, Fishwick S (2009) Scales of transient convec- tive support beneath Africa. Geology. https ://doi.org/10.1130/ G2570 3A.1 Araújo AG, Guimarães F (1992) Geologia de Angola. Notícia expli- cativa da carta geológica à escala 1:1000000 137 Aslanian D, Moulin M, Olivet JL et al (2009) Brazilian and African passive margins of the Central Segment of the South Atlantic Ocean: kinematic constraints. Tectonophysics 468:98–112. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto .2008.12.016 Babonneau N, Savoye B, Cremer M, Bez M (2010) Sedimentary Architecture in Meanders of a Submarine Channel: detailed Study of the Present Congo Turbidite Channel (Zaiango Pro- ject). J Sediment Res 80:852–866. https ://doi.org/10.2110/ jsr.2010.078 Bache F, Leroy S, Baurion C et al (2011) Post-rift uplift of the Dho- far margin (Gulf of Aden). Terra Nova 23:11–18. https ://doi. org/10.1111/j.1365-3121.2010.00975 .x Beglinger SE, Doust H, Cloetingh S (2012) Relating petroleum system and play development to basin evolution: West Afri- can South Atlantic basins. Mar Pet Geol 30:1–25. https ://doi. org/10.1016/j.marpe tgeo.2011.08.008 Behrmann JH, Shulgin A, Prokoph A (2011) High Resolution Bathy- metric Survey on the NW Slope of Walvis Ridge, Offshore Namibia. Ber Naturf Ges Freiburg i Br 101:97–110 Binks RM, Fairhead JD (1992) A plate tectonic setting for Mesozoic rifts of West and Central Africa. Tectonophysics 213:141–151 Blaich OA, Faleide JI, Tsikalas F (2011) Crustal breakup and continent-ocean transition at South Atlantic conjugate mar- gins. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 116:1–38. https ://doi. org/10.1029/2010J B0076 86 Bott MHP (1995) Mechanisms of rifting: Geodynamic modeling of continental rift systems. In: Olsen KH (ed) Continental rifts. evolution, structure, tectonics, 466. Elsevier, New York Brown RW, J. RD A, SM et al (1990) An Early Cretaceous phase of accelerated erosion on the South-Western margin of Africa: evidence from apatite fission track analysis and the offshore sedimentary record. Nucl Tracks Radiat Meas 17:339–350 Brown R, Gallagher K, Duane M (1994) A quantitative assessment of the effects of magmatism on the thermal history of the Karoo sedimentary sequence. J Afr Earth Sc 18:227–243 Brown RW, Summerfield MA, Gleadow AJW (2002) Denudational history along a transect across the Drakensberg Escarp- ment of southern Africa derived from apatite fission track thermochronology. J Geophys Res 107:2350. https ://doi. org/10.1029/2001J B0007 45 https://doi.org/10.1130/G25703A.1 https://doi.org/10.1130/G25703A.1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2008.12.016 https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2010.078 https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2010.078 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3121.2010.00975.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3121.2010.00975.x https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2011.08.008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2011.08.008 https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JB007686 https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JB007686 https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000745 https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000745 110 International Journal of Earth Sciences (2019) 108:89–113 1 3 Brown RW, Beucher R, Roper S et al (2013) Natural age dispersion arising from the analysis of broken crystals. Part I: Theoretical basis and implications for the apatite (U – Th)/ He thermo- chronometer. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. https ://doi. org/10.1016/j.gca.2013.05.041 Brown R, Summerfield M, Gleadow A et al (2014) Intracontinental deformation in southern Africa during the Late Cretaceous. J Afr Earth Sc 100:20–41. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafre arsci . 2014.05.014 Brune S, Heine C, Pérez-Gussinye M, Sobolev SV (2014) Rift migra- tion explains continental margin asymmetry and crustal hyper- extension. Nat Commun. https ://doi.org/10.1038/ncomm s5014 Brune S, Heine C, Clift PD, Perez-Gussiny M (2017) Rifted margin architecture and crustal rheology: reviewing Iberia-Newfound- land, Central South Atlantic, and South China Sea. Mar Pet Geol 79:257–281. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpe tgeo.2016.10.018 Buck WR (1986) Small-scale convection induced by passive rift- ing: the cause for uplift of rift shoulders. Earth Planet Sci Lett 77:362–372 Bunge H-P, Glasmacher UA (2018) Models and observations of verti- cal motion (MoveOn) associated with rifting to passive margins: Preface. Gondwana Res 53:1–8 Burke K (1996) The African plate. S Afr J Geol 99:341–409 Burov E, Cloetingh S (1997) Erosion and rift dynamics: new thermo- mechanical aspects of post-rift evolution of extensional basins. Earth Planet Sci Lett 150:7–26 Carlson WD, Donelick RA, Ketcham RA (1999) Variability of apa- tite fission-track annealing kinetics: I. Experimental results. Am Miner 84:1213–1223. https ://doi.org/10.2138/am-1999-0901 Casciello E, Vergés J, Cruz I et al (2016) Structural and Stratigraphic Study of the Namibe Basin (Angola). In: AAPG annual conven- tion and exhibition. Calgary, Alberta Catuneanu O, Wopfner H, Eriksson PG et al (2005) The Karoo basins of south-central Africa. J Afr Earth Sc 43:211–253. https ://doi. org/10.1016/j.jafre arsci .2005.07.007 Clerc C, Ringenbach J, Jolivet L, Ballard J (2018) Rifted margins: duc- tile deformation, boudinage, continentward-dipping normal faults and the role of the weak lower crust. Gondwana Res 53:20–40. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2017.04.030 Cockburn HAP, Brown RW, Summerfield MA, Seidl MA (2000) Quan- tifying passive margin denudation and landscape development using a combined fission-track thermochronology and cosmo- genic isotope analysis approach. Earth Planet Sci Lett 179:429– 435. https ://doi.org/10.1016/S0012 -821X(00)00144 -8 Colli L, Stotz I, Bunge HP et al (2014) Rapid South Atlantic spreading changes and coeval vertical motion in surrounding continents: evidence for temporal changes of pressure-driven upper mantle flow. Tectonics 33:1304–1321. https ://doi.org/10.1002/2014T C0036 12 Colli L, Ghelichkhan S, Bunge H, Oeser J (2018) Retrodictions of Mid Paleogene mantle fl ow and dynamic topography in the Atlantic region from compressible high resolution adjoint man- tle convection models: sensitivity to deep mantle viscosity and tomographic input model. Gondwana Res 53:252–272. https :// doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2017.04.027 Contrucci I, Matias L, Moulin M et al (2004) Deep structure of the West African continental margin (Congo, Zaıre, Angola), between 5°S and 8 °S, from reflection/refraction seismics and gravity data. Geophys J Int 158:529–553. https ://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1365-246X.2004.02303 .x Dafoe LT, Keen CE, Dickie K, Williams GL (2017) Regional stratig- raphy and subsidence of Orphan Basin near the time of breakup and implications for rifting processes. Basin Res 29:233–254. https ://doi.org/10.1111/bre.12147 De Waele B, Johnson SP, Pisarevsky SA (2008) Palaeoproterozoic to Neoproterozoic growth and evolution of the eastern Congo Craton: its role in the Rodinia puzzle. Precambr Res 160:127– 141. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.preca mres.2007.04.020 De Vera J, Granado P, McClay K (2010) Structural evolution of the Orange Basin gravity-driven system, offshore Namibia. Mar Pet Geol 27:223–237. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpe tgeo.2009.02.003 Dinis PA, Callapez PM, Dinis JL, Alberto A (2010) A Campanian (?) Gilbert delta from Namibe (Angola). Preliminary data on outstanding exposures. Geosci On-line J 21:1–4 Donelick RA, O’Sullivan PB, Ketcham RA (2005) Apatite Fission- Track Analysis. Rev Mineral Geochem 58:49–94. https ://doi. org/10.2138/rmg.2005.58.3 Dressel I, Scheck-Wenderoth M, Cacace M, Reichert C (2015) Recon- struction of the southwestern African continental margin by backward modeling. Mar Pet Geol 67:544–555. https ://doi. org/10.1016/j.marpe tgeo.2015.06.006 Dressel I, Cacace M, Scheck-wenderoth M (2016) Coupled thermo- mechanical 3D subsidence analysis along the SW African pas- sive continental margin. Arab J Geosci. https ://doi.org/10.1007/ s1251 7-016-2407-9 Dressel I, Scheck-wenderoth M, Cacace M (2017) Tectonophysics Backward modelling of the subsidence evolution of the Colorado Basin, offshore Argentina and its relation to the evolution of the conjugate Orange Basin, offshore SW Africa. Tectonophysics 716:168–181. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto .2016.08.007 Eales HV, Marsh JS, Cox KG (1984) The Karoo igneous province: an introduction. In: Erlank, AJ (ed) Petrogenesis of the volcanic rocks of the karoo province. Special Publication, vol 13. Geologi- cal Society of South Africa, Johannesburg, p 395 Ebinger CJ, Bechtel TD, Forsyth DW, Bowin CO (1989) Effective elas- tic plate thickness beneath the East African and Afar plateaus and dynamic compensation of the uplifts. J Geophys Res 94:2883–2901 Ehlers TA, Farley KA (2003) Apatite (U-Th)/He thermochronometry: methods and applications to problems in tectonic and surface processes. Earth Planetary Science Letters 206:1–14. https ://doi. org/10.1016/S0012 -821X(02)01069 -5 Farley KA, Wolf RA, Silver LT (1996) The effects of long alpha-stop- ping distances on (U-Th)/He ages. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 60:4223–4229. https ://doi.org/10.1016/S0016 -7037(96)00193 -7 Flowers RM, Kelley SA (2011) Interpreting data dispersion and “inverted” dates in apatite (U-Th)/He and fission-track datasets: an example from the US midcontinent. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 75:5169–5186. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2011.06.016 Flowers RM, Schoene B (2010) (U-Th)/He thermochronometry con- straints on unroofing of the eastern Kaapvaal craton and sig- nificance for uplift of the southern African plateau. Geology 38:827–830. https ://doi.org/10.1130/G3098 0.1 Flowers RM, Ketcham RA, Shuster DL, Farley KA (2009) Apatite (U-Th)/He thermochronometry using a radiation damage accu- mulation and annealing model. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 73:2347–2365. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2009.01.015 Franke D (2013) Rifting, lithosphere breakup and volcanism: com- parison of magma-poor and volcanic rifted margins. Mar Pet Geol 43:63–87. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpe tgeo.2012.11.003 Friedrich AM, Bunge H, Rieger SM et al (2018) Stratigraphic frame- work for the plume mode of mantle convection and the analysis of interregional unconformities on geological maps. Gondwana Res 53:159–188. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2017.06.003 Galbraith RF (1981) On statistical models for fission track counts. J Inter Assoc Math Geo 13(6):471–478 Gallagher K (2012) Transdimensional inverse thermal history modeling for quantitative thermochronology. J oGeophys Res Solid Earth 117:1–16. https ://doi.org/10.1029/2011J B0088 25 Gallagher K, Brown RW (1997) The onshore record of passive margin evolution. J Geol Soc 154:451–457. https ://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs . 154.3.0451 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2013.05.041 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2013.05.041 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2014.05.014 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2014.05.014 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5014 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2016.10.018 https://doi.org/10.2138/am-1999-0901 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2005.07.007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2005.07.007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2017.04.030 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(00)00144-8 https://doi.org/10.1002/2014TC003612 https://doi.org/10.1002/2014TC003612 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2017.04.027 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2017.04.027 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02303.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02303.x https://doi.org/10.1111/bre.12147 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2007.04.020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2009.02.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2009.02.003 https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2005.58.3 https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2005.58.3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.06.006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.06.006 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2407-9 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2407-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2016.08.007 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(02)01069-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(02)01069-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(96)00193-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2011.06.016 https://doi.org/10.1130/G30980.1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2009.01.015 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2012.11.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2017.06.003 https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008825 https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.154.3.0451 https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.154.3.0451 111International Journal of Earth Sciences (2019) 108:89–113 1 3 Gallagher K, Brown R (1999) Denudation and uplift at passive mar- gins: the record on the Atlantic Margin of southern Africa. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 357:835–859. https ://doi. org/10.1098/rsta.1999.0354 Gallagher K, Brown R, Johnson C (1998) Fission track analysis and its applications to geological problems. Annual Rev Earth Planet Sci 26(1):519–572 Gallagher K, Charvin K, Nielsen S et al (2009) Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling methods to determine optimal mod- els, model resolution and model choice for Earth Science prob- lems. Mar Pet Geol 26:525–535. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpe tgeo.2009.01.003 Gautheron C, Tassan-got L, Barbarand J, Pagel M (2009) Effect of alpha-damage annealing on apatite (U-Th)/ He thermochronol- ogy. Chem Geol 266:157–170. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemg eo.2009.06.001 Gautheron C, Barbarand J, Ketcham RA et al (2013) Chemical in fl uence on α -recoil damage annealing in apatite: implications for (U-Th)/ He dating. Chem Geol 351:257–267. https ://doi. org/10.1016/j.chemg eo.2013.05.027 Gindre-Chanu L, Warren JK, Puigdefabregas C et al (2015) Diagenetic evolution of aptian evaporites in the namibe basin (south-west Angola). Sedimentology 62:204–233. https ://doi.org/10.1111/ sed.12146 Gindre-Chanu L, Perri E, Sharp R. I et al (2016) Origin and diagenetic evolution of gypsum and microbialitic carbonates in the Late Sag of the Namibe Basin (SW Angola). Sed Geol 342:133–153. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedge o.2016.06.015 Giresse P, Hoang C-T, Kouyoumontzakis G (1984) Analysis of vertical movements deduced from a geochronological study of marine Pleistocene deposits, southern coast of Angola. J Afr Earth Sci 2:177–187. https ://doi.org/10.1016/S0731 -7247(84)80012 -9 Gleadow AJW (1981) Fission-track dating methods: what are the real alternatives? Nuclear Tracks 5:3–14. https ://doi. org/10.1016/0191-278X(81)90021 -4 Green PF (1981) A new look at statistics in fission-track dating. Nuclear Tracks 5:77–86. https ://doi.org/10.1016/0191-278X(81)90029 -9 Green PF, Machado V (2015) Pre-rift and synrift exhumation, post- rift subsidence and exhumation of the onshore Namibe Margin of Angola revealed from apatite fission track analysis. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ. https ://doi.org/10.1144/SP438 .2 Green P, Swart R, Jacob J et al (2009) Thermochronology and land- scape development in Southern Africa. In: PESGB/HGS Africa Meeting, London Green PF, Duddy IR, Japsen P et al (2015) Post-breakup burial and exhumation of the southern margin of Africa. Basin Res. https :// doi.org/10.1111/bre.12167 Green PF, Japsen P, Chalmers JA et al (2018) Post-breakup burial and exhumation of passive continental margins: seven propositions to inform geodynamic models. Gondwana Res 53:58–81. https :// doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2017.03.007 Gröger HR, Machado V, Pinto G Di (2013) Uplift, exhumation and erosion along the Angolan continental margin : an integrated approach. In: EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. Vienna, Austria, p 8711 Guillocheau F, Rouby D, Robin C et al (2012) Quantification and causes of the terrigeneous sediment budget at the scale of a continental margin: a new method applied to the Namibia-South Africa margin. Basin Res 24:3–30. https ://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2117.2011.00511 .x Guillocheau F, Simon B, Baby G et al (2018) Planation surfaces as a record of mantle dynamics: the case example of Africa. Gond- wana Res 53:82–98. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2017.05.015 Guiraud R, Bosworth W (1997) Senonian basin inversion and rejuvena- tion of rifting in Africa and Arabia: synthesis and implications to plate-scale tectonics. Tectonophysics 282:39–82. https ://doi. org/10.1016/S0040 -1951(97)00212 -6 Guiraud M, Buta-Neto A, Quesne D (2010) Segmentation and differen- tial post-rift uplift at the Angola margin as recorded by the trans- form-rifted Benguela and oblique-to-orthogonal-rifted Kwanza basins. Mar Pet Geol 27:1040–1068. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j. marpe tgeo.2010.01.017 Hudec MR, Jackson MPA (2002) Structural segmentation, inversion, and salt tectonics on a passive margin: evolution of the Inner Kwanza Basin, Angola. Bull Geol Soc Am 114:1222–1244. https ://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(2002)114%3C122 2:SSIAS T%3E2.0.CO;2 Huismans R, Beaumont C (2011) Depth-dependent extension, two- stage breakup and cratonic underplating at rifted margins. Nature 473:74–78. https ://doi.org/10.1038/natur e0998 8 Huismans RS, Beaumont C (2014) Rifted continental margins: the case for depth-dependent extension. Earth Planet Sci Lett 407:148– 162. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2014.09.032 Jackson MPA, Hudec MR, Hegarty KA (2005) The great West African Tertiary coastal uplift: fact or fiction? A perspective from the Angolan divergent margin. Tectonics. https ://doi. org/10.1029/2005T C0018 36 Japsen P, Bonow JM, Green PF et al (2006) Elevated, passive continen- tal margins: long-term highs or Neogene uplifts? New evidence from West Greenland. Earth Planet Sci Lett 248:315–324. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2006.05.036 Jerram D, Mountney N, Holzförster F, Stollhofen H (1999) Internal stratigraphic relationships in the Etendeka Group in the Huab Basin, NW Namibia: Understanding the onset of flood vol- canism. J Geodyn 28:393–418. https ://doi.org/10.1016/S0264 -3707(99)00018 -6 Johnson MR, Van Vuuren CJ, Hegenberger WF et al (1996) Stratig- raphy of the Karoo Supergroup in southern Africa: an over- view. J Afr Earth Sc 23:3–15. https ://doi.org/10.1016/S0899 -5362(96)00048 -6 Jung S, Mezger K (2001) Geochronology in migmatites—a Sm-Nd, U-Pb and Rb-Sr study from the Proterozoic Damara belt (Namibia): implications for polyphase development of migma- tites in high-grade terranes. J Metamorph Geol 19:77–97. https :// doi.org/10.1046/j.0263-4929.2000.00297 .x Ketcham RA, Carter A, Donelick RA et al (2007a) Improved measure- ment of fission-track annealing in apatite using c-axis projection. Am Miner 92:789–798. https ://doi.org/10.2138/am.2007.2280 Ketcham RA, Carter A, Donelick RA et al (2007b) Improved modeling of fission-track annealing in apatite. Am Miner 92:799–810. https ://doi.org/10.2138/am.2007.2281 Ketcham RA, Gautheron C, Tassan-Got L (2011) Accounting for long alpha-particle stopping distances in (U-Th-Sm)/He geochronol- ogy: refinement of the baseline case. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 75:7779–7791. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2011.10.011 Ketcham RA, Carter A, Hurford A (2015) Inter-laboratory comparison of fission track confined length and etch figure measurements in apatite. Am Miner 100:1452–1468 Koch C, Coole P (2014) Regional Prospectivity of Offshore Namibia and the Angolan Namibe Basin. In: 76th EAGE international conference & exhibition. AAPG Datapages Search and Discov- ery, pp 14–17 Kounov A, Viola G, de Wit M, Andreoli MAG (2009) Denudation along the Atlantic passive margin: new insights from apatite fission-track analysis on the western coast of South Africa. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ 324:287–306. https ://doi.org/10.1144/ SP324 .19 Kroner A (1982) Rb/Sr geochronology and tectonic evolution of the Pan-African Damara Belt of Namibia, southwestern Africa. Am J Sci 282:1471–1507. https ://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.282.9.1471 Kukla PA, Strozyk F, Mohriak WU (2018) South Atlantic salt basins – Witnesses of complex passive margin evolution. Gondwana Res 53:41–57. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2017.03.012 https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1999.0354 https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1999.0354 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2009.01.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2009.01.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2009.06.001 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2009.06.001 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.05.027 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.05.027 https://doi.org/10.1111/sed.12146 https://doi.org/10.1111/sed.12146 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2016.06.015 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2016.06.015 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-7247(84)80012-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-278X(81)90021-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-278X(81)90021-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-278X(81)90029-9 https://doi.org/10.1144/SP438.2 https://doi.org/10.1111/bre.12167 https://doi.org/10.1111/bre.12167 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2017.03.007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2017.03.007 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2117.2011.00511.x https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2017.05.015 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(97)00212-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(97)00212-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2010.01.017 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2010.01.017 https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(2002)114%3C1222:SSIAST%3E2.0.CO;2 https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(2002)114%3C1222:SSIAST%3E2.0.CO;2 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09988 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2014.09.032 https://doi.org/10.1029/2005TC001836 https://doi.org/10.1029/2005TC001836 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2006.05.036 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2006.05.036 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-3707(99)00018-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-3707(99)00018-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-5362(96)00048-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-5362(96)00048-6 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0263-4929.2000.00297.x https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0263-4929.2000.00297.x https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2007.2280 https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2007.2281 https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2007.2281 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2011.10.011 https://doi.org/10.1144/SP324.19 https://doi.org/10.1144/SP324.19 https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.282.9.1471 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2017.03.012 112 International Journal of Earth Sciences (2019) 108:89–113 1 3 Lavier LL, Steckler MS, Brigaud F (2001) Climatic and tectonic control on the Cenozoic evolution of the West African mar- gin. Mar Geol 178:63–80. https ://doi.org/10.1016/S0025 -3227 (01)00175 -X Lentini MR, Fraser SI, Sumner HS, Davies RJ (2010) Geodynamics of the central South Atlantic conjugate margins: implications for hydrocarbon potential. Pet Geosc 16:217–229. https ://doi. org/10.1144/1354-07930 9-909 Lithgow-Bertelloni C, Silver P (1998) Dynamic topography, plate driv- ing forces and the African superswell. Nature 395:345–348. https ://doi.org/10.1038/26212 Lundin E, Doré AG (2002) Mid-Cenozoic post-breakup deformation in the ` passive ’ margins bordering the Norwegian ± Greenland Sea. Mar Pet Geol 19:79–93 Macgregor DS (2010) Understanding African and Brazilian margin climate, topography and drainage systems, implications for predicting deepwater reservoirs and source rock burial history. AAPG, Search and Discovery Article, 10270. http://www.searc handd iscov ery.net/docum ents/2010/10270 macgr egor/ndx_macgr egor.pdf Macgregor DS (2013) Late Cretaceous-Cenozoic sediment and turbid- ite reservoir supply to South Atlantic margins. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ 369:109–128. https ://doi.org/10.1144/SP369 .7 Manatschal G (2004) New models for evolution of magma-poor rifted margins based on a review of data and concepts from West Ibe- ria and the Alps. Int J Earth Sci. https ://doi.org/10.1007/s0053 1-004-0394-7 Marsh JS, Milner SC (2007) Stratigraphic correlation of the Awahab and Tafelberg Formations, Etendeka Group, Namibia, and loca- tion of an eruptive site for flood basalt volcanism. J Afr Earth Sci 48:329–340. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafre ars