Bandyopadhyay-Ghosh, S.Faria, P. E. P.Johnson, A.Felipucci, D. N. B.Reaney, I. M.Salata, L. A.Brook, I. M.Hatton, P. V.2014-05-272014-05-272010-09-01Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A, v. 94, n. 3, p. 760-768, 2010.1549-32961552-4965http://hdl.handle.net/11449/71844Modified fluorcanasite glasses were fabricated by either altering the molar ratios of Na 2O and CaO or by adding P 2O 5 to the parent stoichiometric glass compositions. Glasses were converted to glass-ceramics by a controlled two-stage heat treatment process. Rods (2 mm x 4 mm) were produced using the conventional lost-wax casting technique. Osteoconductive 45S5 bioglass was used as a reference material. Biocompatibility and osteoconductivity were investigated by implantation into healing defects (2 mm) in the midshaft of rabbit femora. Tissue response was investigated using conventional histology and scanning electron microscopy. Histological and histomorphometric evaluation of specimens after 12 weeks implantation showed significantly more bone contact with the surface of 45S5 bioglass implants when compared with other test materials. When the bone contact for each material was compared between experimental time points, the Glass-Ceramic 2 (CaO rich) group showed significant difference (p = 0.027) at 4 weeks, but no direct contact at 12 weeks. Histology and backscattered electron photomicrographs showed that modified fluorcanasite glass-ceramic implants had greater osteoconductivity than the parent stoichiometric composition. Of the new materials, fluorcanasite glass-ceramic implants modified by the addition of P 2O 5 showed the greatest stimulation of new mineralized bone tissue formation adjacent to the implants after 4 and 12 weeks implantation. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.760-768eng45S5 bioglassBone tissueFluorcanasiteGlass-ceramicIn vivo biocompatibilityOsteoconductivityBackscattered electronsBio-glassBone contactsDirect contactGlass compositionsHeat treatment processIn-vivoMineralized boneMolar ratioNew materialOsteoconductiveReference materialStoichiometric compositionsTest materialsTime pointsTissue responseTwo stageWax castingBiocompatibilityGlass ceramicsHistologyScanning electron microscopySecondary batteriesSodiumBonefluorcanasite glassglassunclassified druganimal experimentanimal modelanimal tissuebiocompatibilitybone defectbone remodelingbone tissue augmentationbone tissue repairceramicsfemalefemur shafthistopathologymorphometricsnonhumanrabbitscanning electron microscopyAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBone and BonesBone SubstitutesCeramicsFemaleImplants, ExperimentalMaterials TestingRabbitsRandom AllocationSilicatesArtigo10.1002/jbm.a.32750Acesso restrito2-s2.0-77954793403